Literature DB >> 32519246

Mistiming Death: Modeling the Time-Domain Variability of Tumor Apoptosis and Implications for Molecular Imaging of Cell Death.

Seth T Gammon1, Brian J Engel1, Gregory J Gores2, Erik Cressman3, David Piwnica-Worms1, Steven W Millward4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Apoptosis, in the context of cancer, is a form of programmed cell death induced by chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy. As this is a central pathway in treatment response, considerable effort has been expended on the development of molecular imaging agents to non-invasively measure tumor apoptosis prior to quantitative changes in tumor dimensions. Despite these efforts, clinical trials directed at imaging apoptosis by PET, SPECT, and MRI have failed to robustly predict response to treatment with high sensitivity and specificity. Although these shortcomings may be linked to probe design, we propose that the combination of variability in the timing of maximal in vivo tumor apoptosis and sub-optimal sampling times fundamentally limits the predictive power of PET/SPECT apoptosis imaging. PROCEDURES: Herein, we surveyed the literature describing the time course of therapy-induced tumor apoptosis in vivo and used these data to construct a mathematical model describing the onset, duration, amplitude, and variability of the apoptotic response. Uncertainty in the underlying time of initiation of tumor apoptosis was simulated by Gaussian, uniform, and Landau distributions centered at the median time-to-maximum apoptotic rate derived from the literature. We then computationally sampled these models for various durations to simulate PET/SPECT imaging agents with variable effective half-lives.
RESULTS: Models with a narrow Gaussian distribution of initiation times for tumor apoptosis predicted high contrast ratios and strong predictive values for all effective tracer half-lives. However, when uncertainty in apoptosis initiation times were simulated with uniform and Landau distributions, high contrast ratios and predictive values were only obtained with extremely long imaging windows (days). The imaging contrast ratios predicted in these models were consistent with those seen in pre-clinical apoptosis PET/SPECT imaging studies and suggest that uncertainty in the timing of tumor cell death plays a significant role in the maximal contrast obtainable. Moreover, when uncertainty in both apoptosis initiation and imaging start times were simulated, the predicted contrast ratios were dramatically reduced for all tracer half-lives.
CONCLUSIONS: These studies illustrate the effect of uncertainty of apoptosis initiation on the predictive power of PET/SPECT apoptosis imaging agents and suggest that long integration times are required to surmount uncertainty in the time domain of this biological process.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cell death; Molecular imaging; Tumor apoptosis

Year:  2020        PMID: 32519246      PMCID: PMC8279023          DOI: 10.1007/s11307-020-01509-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol        ISSN: 1536-1632            Impact factor:   3.488


  46 in total

Review 1.  The role of autophagy in cancer development and response to therapy.

Authors:  Yasuko Kondo; Takao Kanzawa; Raymond Sawaya; Seiji Kondo
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 60.716

2.  Synthesis and characterization of a small, membrane-permeant, caspase-activatable far-red fluorescent peptide for imaging apoptosis.

Authors:  Kristin Bullok; David Piwnica-Worms
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2005-08-25       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 3.  Apoptosis and caspases regulate death and inflammation in sepsis.

Authors:  Richard S Hotchkiss; Donald W Nicholson
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2006-10-13       Impact factor: 53.106

Review 4.  Phosphatidylethanolamine targeting for cell death imaging in early treatment response evaluation and disease diagnosis.

Authors:  Filipe Elvas; Sigrid Stroobants; Leonie Wyffels
Journal:  Apoptosis       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  Mesenteric arterial disease: the present position.

Authors:  A Marston
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1967-06       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  In vitro and in vivo evaluation of the caspase-3 substrate-based radiotracer [(18)F]-CP18 for PET imaging of apoptosis in tumors.

Authors:  Chun-Fang Xia; Gang Chen; Umesh Gangadharmath; Luis F Gomez; Qianwa Liang; Fanrong Mu; Vani P Mocharla; Helen Su; A Katrin Szardenings; Joseph C Walsh; Tieming Zhao; Hartmuth C Kolb
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.488

7.  Caspase-3 Substrates for Noninvasive Pharmacodynamic Imaging of Apoptosis by PET/CT.

Authors:  Brian J Engel; Seth T Gammon; Rajan Chaudhari; Zhen Lu; Federica Pisaneschi; Hailing Yang; Argentina Ornelas; Victoria Yan; Lindsay Kelderhouse; Amer M Najjar; William P Tong; Shuxing Zhang; David Piwnica-Worms; Robert C Bast; Steven W Millward
Journal:  Bioconjug Chem       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 4.774

8.  [18F]- and [11C]-labeled N-benzyl-isatin sulfonamide analogues as PET tracers for apoptosis: synthesis, radiolabeling mechanism, and in vivo imaging study of apoptosis in Fas-treated mice using [11C]WC-98.

Authors:  Dong Zhou; Wenhua Chu; Delphine L Chen; Qi Wang; David E Reichert; Justin Rothfuss; Andre D'Avignon; Michael J Welch; Robert H Mach
Journal:  Org Biomol Chem       Date:  2009-02-16       Impact factor: 3.876

Review 9.  Autophagy in the pathogenesis of disease.

Authors:  Beth Levine; Guido Kroemer
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Temporal and spatial evolution of therapy-induced tumor apoptosis detected by caspase-3-selective molecular imaging.

Authors:  Quang-Dé Nguyen; Ioannis Lavdas; James Gubbins; Graham Smith; Robin Fortt; Laurence S Carroll; Martin A Graham; Eric O Aboagye
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 12.531

View more
  2 in total

1.  A first-in-human study of [68Ga]Ga-CDI: a positron emitting radiopharmaceutical for imaging tumour cell death.

Authors:  Ivan Ho Shon; Thomas Hennessy; Jennifer Guille; Michael P Gotsbacher; Angelina J Lay; Bruce McBride; Rachel Codd; Philip J Hogg
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-07-02       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Latest Advances in Imaging Oxidative Stress in Cancer.

Authors:  Hannah E Greenwood; Timothy H Witney
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 11.082

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.