Literature DB >> 16501974

In vitro validation of bioluminescent monitoring of disease progression and therapeutic response in leukaemia model animals.

Yusuke Inoue1, Arinobu Tojo, Rieko Sekine, Yasushi Soda, Seiichiro Kobayashi, Akiko Nomura, Kiyoko Izawa, Toshio Kitamura, Toshiyuki Okubo, Kuni Ohtomo.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The application of in vivo bioluminescence imaging to non-invasive, quantitative monitoring of tumour models relies on a positive correlation between the intensity of bioluminescence and the tumour burden. We conducted cell culture studies to investigate the relationship between bioluminescent signal intensity and viable cell numbers in murine leukaemia model cells.
METHODS: Interleukin-3 (IL-3)-dependent murine pro-B cell line Ba/F3 was transduced with firefly luciferase to generate cells expressing luciferase stably under the control of a retroviral long terminal repeat. The luciferase-expressing cells were transduced with p190 BCR-ABL to give factor-independent proliferation. The cells were cultured under various conditions, and bioluminescent signal intensity was compared with viable cell numbers and the cell cycle stage.
RESULTS: The Ba/F3 cells showed autonomous growth as well as stable luciferase expression following transduction with both luciferase and p190 BCR-ABL, and in vivo bioluminescence imaging permitted external detection of these cells implanted into mice. The bioluminescence intensities tended to reflect cell proliferation and responses to imatinib in cell culture studies. However, the luminescence per viable cell was influenced by the IL-3 concentration in factor-dependent cells and by the stage of proliferation and imatinib concentration in factor-independent cells, thereby impairing the proportionality between viable cell number and bioluminescent signal intensity. Luminescence per cell tended to vary in association with the fraction of proliferating cells.
CONCLUSION: Although in vivo bioluminescence imaging would allow non-invasive monitoring of leukaemia model animals, environmental factors and therapeutic interventions may cause some discrepancies between tumour burden and bioluminescence intensity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16501974     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-005-0048-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  39 in total

1.  Monitoring luciferase-labeled cancer cell growth and metastasis in different in vivo models.

Authors:  Masaki Nogawa; Takeshi Yuasa; Shinya Kimura; Junya Kuroda; Kiyoshi Sato; Hidekazu Segawa; Asumi Yokota; Taira Maekawa
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2005-01-20       Impact factor: 8.679

Review 2.  BCR/ABL genes and leukemic phenotype: from molecular mechanisms to clinical correlations.

Authors:  Fabrizio Pane; Mariano Intrieri; Concetta Quintarelli; Barbara Izzo; Giada Casadei Muccioli; Francesco Salvatore
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2002-12-09       Impact factor: 9.867

3.  Noninvasive imaging of spontaneous retinoblastoma pathway-dependent tumors in mice.

Authors:  Marc Vooijs; Jos Jonkers; Scott Lyons; Anton Berns
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2002-03-15       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 4.  Advancing animal models of neoplasia through in vivo bioluminescence imaging.

Authors:  M Edinger; Y-a Cao; Y S Hornig; D E Jenkins; M R Verneris; M H Bachmann; R S Negrin; C H Contag
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 9.162

5.  Rapid and quantitative assessment of cancer treatment response using in vivo bioluminescence imaging.

Authors:  A Rehemtulla; L D Stegman; S J Cardozo; S Gupta; D E Hall; C H Contag; B D Ross
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.715

6.  Cell uptake and tissue distribution of radioiodine labelled D-luciferin: implications for luciferase based gene imaging.

Authors:  K-H Lee; S S Byun; J-Y Paik; S Y Lee; S H Song; Y S Choe; B-T Kim
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.690

7.  The potential of 5-fluorocytosine/cytosine deaminase enzyme prodrug gene therapy in an intrahepatic colon cancer model.

Authors:  M K Nyati; Z Symon; E Kievit; K J Dornfeld; S D Rynkiewicz; B D Ross; A Rehemtulla; T S Lawrence
Journal:  Gene Ther       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.250

8.  Real-time imaging of TRAIL-induced apoptosis of glioma tumors in vivo.

Authors:  Khalid Shah; Yi Tang; Xandra Breakefield; Ralph Weissleder
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2003-10-09       Impact factor: 9.867

9.  Revealing lymphoma growth and the efficacy of immune cell therapies using in vivo bioluminescence imaging.

Authors:  Matthias Edinger; Yu-An Cao; Michael R Verneris; Michael H Bachmann; Christopher H Contag; Robert S Negrin
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2002-09-26       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  Validating bioluminescence imaging as a high-throughput, quantitative modality for assessing tumor burden.

Authors:  Zain Paroo; Robert A Bollinger; Dwaine A Braasch; Edmond Richer; David R Corey; Peter P Antich; Ralph P Mason
Journal:  Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.488

View more
  6 in total

1.  Subcutaneous administration of D-luciferin is an effective alternative to intraperitoneal injection in bioluminescence imaging of xenograft tumors in nude mice.

Authors:  Ashraf A Khalil; Mark J Jameson; William C Broaddus; Theodore D Chung; Sarah E Golding; Seth M Dever; Elisabeth Rosenberg; Kristoffer Valerie
Journal:  ISRN Mol Imaging       Date:  2013

2.  Plasma protein binding of luciferase substrates influences sensitivity and accuracy of bioluminescence imaging.

Authors:  Marleen Keyaerts; Carola Heneweer; Lea O Tchouate Gainkam; Vicky Caveliers; Bradley J Beattie; Geert A Martens; Christian Vanhove; Axel Bossuyt; Ronald G Blasberg; Tony Lahoutte
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  In vivo fluorescence imaging of the reticuloendothelial system using quantum dots in combination with bioluminescent tumour monitoring.

Authors:  Yusuke Inoue; Kiyoko Izawa; Kohki Yoshikawa; Haruyasu Yamada; Arinobu Tojo; Kuni Ohtomo
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-09-21       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Comparison of subcutaneous and intraperitoneal injection of D-luciferin for in vivo bioluminescence imaging.

Authors:  Yusuke Inoue; Shigeru Kiryu; Kiyoko Izawa; Makoto Watanabe; Arinobu Tojo; Kuni Ohtomo
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-12-19       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Timing of imaging after d-luciferin injection affects the longitudinal assessment of tumor growth using in vivo bioluminescence imaging.

Authors:  Yusuke Inoue; Shigeru Kiryu; Makoto Watanabe; Arinobu Tojo; Kuni Ohtomo
Journal:  Int J Biomed Imaging       Date:  2010-07-05

6.  Bioluminescence imaging of leukemia cell lines in vitro and in mouse xenografts: effects of monoclonal and polyclonal cell populations on intensity and kinetics of photon emission.

Authors:  Sandra Christoph; Jennifer Schlegel; Francesca Alvarez-Calderon; Yong-Mi Kim; Luis N Brandao; Deborah DeRyckere; Douglas K Graham
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 17.388

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.