UNLABELLED: This study was performed to prospectively evaluate fast PET/CT imaging protocols using lutetium oxyorthosilicate (LSO) detector technology and 3-dimensional (3D) image-acquisition protocols. METHODS: Fifty-seven consecutive patients (30 male, 27 female; mean age, 58.6 +/- 15.7 y) were enrolled in the study. After intravenous injection of 7.77 MBq (0.21 mCi) of (18)F-FDG per kilogram, a standard whole-body CT study (80-110 s) and PET emission scan were acquired for 4 min/bed position in 49 patients and 3 min/bed position in 8 patients. One-minute-per-bed-position data were then extracted from the 3- or 4-min/bed position scans to reconstruct single-minute/bed position scans for each patient. Patients were subgrouped according to weight as follows: <59 kg (<130 lb; n = 15), 59-81 kg (130-179 lb; n = 33), and >or=82 kg (>or=180 lb; n = 9). Three experienced observers recorded numbers and locations of lesion by consensus and independently rated image quality as good, moderate, poor, or nondiagnostic. RESULTS: The observers analyzed 220 reconstructed whole-body PET images from 57 patients. They identified 114 lesions ranging in size from 0.7 to 7.0 cm on the 3- (n = 8) and 4-min/bed position images (n = 49). Of these, only 4 were missed on the 1-min/bed position scans, and all lesions were identified on the corresponding 2-min/bed position images. One- and 2-min/bed position image quality differed significantly from the 4-min/bed position image reference (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: LSO PET detector technology permits fast 3D imaging protocols whereby weight-based emission scan durations ranging from 1 to 3 min/bed position provide similar lesion detectability when compared with 4-min/bed position images.
UNLABELLED: This study was performed to prospectively evaluate fast PET/CT imaging protocols using lutetium oxyorthosilicate (LSO) detector technology and 3-dimensional (3D) image-acquisition protocols. METHODS: Fifty-seven consecutive patients (30 male, 27 female; mean age, 58.6 +/- 15.7 y) were enrolled in the study. After intravenous injection of 7.77 MBq (0.21 mCi) of (18)F-FDG per kilogram, a standard whole-body CT study (80-110 s) and PET emission scan were acquired for 4 min/bed position in 49 patients and 3 min/bed position in 8 patients. One-minute-per-bed-position data were then extracted from the 3- or 4-min/bed position scans to reconstruct single-minute/bed position scans for each patient. Patients were subgrouped according to weight as follows: <59 kg (<130 lb; n = 15), 59-81 kg (130-179 lb; n = 33), and >or=82 kg (>or=180 lb; n = 9). Three experienced observers recorded numbers and locations of lesion by consensus and independently rated image quality as good, moderate, poor, or nondiagnostic. RESULTS: The observers analyzed 220 reconstructed whole-body PET images from 57 patients. They identified 114 lesions ranging in size from 0.7 to 7.0 cm on the 3- (n = 8) and 4-min/bed position images (n = 49). Of these, only 4 were missed on the 1-min/bed position scans, and all lesions were identified on the corresponding 2-min/bed position images. One- and 2-min/bed position image quality differed significantly from the 4-min/bed position image reference (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: LSO PET detector technology permits fast 3D imaging protocols whereby weight-based emission scan durations ranging from 1 to 3 min/bed position provide similar lesion detectability when compared with 4-min/bed position images.
Authors: Arman Rahmim; Martin A Lodge; Nicolas A Karakatsanis; Vladimir Y Panin; Yun Zhou; Alan McMillan; Steve Cho; Habib Zaidi; Michael E Casey; Richard L Wahl Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2018-09-29 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Todd M Blodgett; Ajeet S Mehta; Amar S Mehta; Charles M Laymon; Jonathan Carney; David W Townsend Journal: Clin Imaging Date: 2011 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 1.605
Authors: Matthias R Benz; Johannes Czernin; William D Tap; Jeffrey J Eckardt; Leanne L Seeger; Martin S Allen-Auerbach; Sarah M Dry; Michael E Phelps; Wolfgang A Weber; Fritz C Eilber Journal: Sarcoma Date: 2010-04-18
Authors: Matthias R Benz; Johannes Czernin; Martin S Allen-Auerbach; William D Tap; Sarah M Dry; David Elashoff; Kira Chow; Vladimir Evilevitch; Jeff J Eckardt; Michael E Phelps; Wolfgang A Weber; Fritz C Eilber Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2009-04-07 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Matthias R Benz; Johannes Czernin; Sarah M Dry; William D Tap; Martin S Allen-Auerbach; David Elashoff; Michael E Phelps; Wolfgang A Weber; Fritz C Eilber Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-01-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Martin Barrio; Johannes Czernin; Michael W Yeh; Miguel F Palma Diaz; Pawan Gupta; Martin Allen-Auerbach; Christiaan Schiepers; Ken Herrmann Journal: Nucl Med Commun Date: 2016-12 Impact factor: 1.690