STUDY OBJECTIVE: To measure the effect of an altered process of care, directed by a computerized reminder system, on rates of symptomatic postoperative venous thromboembolism. DESIGN: Comparisons of preintervention and postintervention measurements. SETTING: A university-affiliated community hospital in Utah. PATIENTS: Two-thousand seventy-seven consecutive patients who underwent major operations in four surgical divisions between January 1, 1997, and October 31, 1997 (preintervention), and 2,093 consecutive patients who underwent the same procedures between January 1, 1998, and October 31,1998 (postintervention). INTERVENTION: A program to prevent venous thromboembolism developed from American College of Chest Physicians guidelines, and an altered work process directed by a computerized reminder system. MEASUREMENTS: Rates of symptomatic, objectively confirmed deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), and death attributable to venous thromboembolism occurring within 90 days of the date of surgery. RESULTS: The preintervention and postintervention cohorts did not differ with respect to age, severity of illness, number of risk factors for venous thromboembolism, or individual risk factors for venous thromboembolism. The overall prophylaxis rate increased from 89.9% before implementation of the computerized reminder system to 95.0% after implementation (p < 0.0001). The combined 90-day rate of symptomatic DVT, PE, and death attributable to PE remained the same (preintervention, 1.0%; postintervention, 1.2%; odds ratio, 1.21; 95% confidence interval, 0.67 to 2.20). Forty of 46 venous thromboembolic complications (87%) occurred despite the delivery of American College of Chest Physicians-recommended measures to prevent venous thromboembolism. CONCLUSIONS: Computerized reminder systems combined with altered care procedures increase the rate of prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism without decreasing the rate of symptomatic venous thromboembolism when the baseline rate of prophylaxis is high. A population of surgical patients exists who are resistant to American College of Chest Physicians-recommended prophylactic measures against venous thromboembolism. New strategies are needed to address prophylaxis-resistant venous thromboembolism.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To measure the effect of an altered process of care, directed by a computerized reminder system, on rates of symptomatic postoperative venous thromboembolism. DESIGN: Comparisons of preintervention and postintervention measurements. SETTING: A university-affiliated community hospital in Utah. PATIENTS: Two-thousand seventy-seven consecutive patients who underwent major operations in four surgical divisions between January 1, 1997, and October 31, 1997 (preintervention), and 2,093 consecutive patients who underwent the same procedures between January 1, 1998, and October 31,1998 (postintervention). INTERVENTION: A program to prevent venous thromboembolism developed from American College of Chest Physicians guidelines, and an altered work process directed by a computerized reminder system. MEASUREMENTS: Rates of symptomatic, objectively confirmed deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), and death attributable to venous thromboembolism occurring within 90 days of the date of surgery. RESULTS: The preintervention and postintervention cohorts did not differ with respect to age, severity of illness, number of risk factors for venous thromboembolism, or individual risk factors for venous thromboembolism. The overall prophylaxis rate increased from 89.9% before implementation of the computerized reminder system to 95.0% after implementation (p < 0.0001). The combined 90-day rate of symptomatic DVT, PE, and death attributable to PE remained the same (preintervention, 1.0%; postintervention, 1.2%; odds ratio, 1.21; 95% confidence interval, 0.67 to 2.20). Forty of 46 venous thromboembolic complications (87%) occurred despite the delivery of American College of Chest Physicians-recommended measures to prevent venous thromboembolism. CONCLUSIONS: Computerized reminder systems combined with altered care procedures increase the rate of prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism without decreasing the rate of symptomatic venous thromboembolism when the baseline rate of prophylaxis is high. A population of surgical patients exists who are resistant to American College of Chest Physicians-recommended prophylactic measures against venous thromboembolism. New strategies are needed to address prophylaxis-resistant venous thromboembolism.
Authors: Zachary M Borab; Michael A Lanni; Michael G Tecce; Christopher J Pannucci; John P Fischer Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2017-07-01 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Gregg Stashenko; Renato D Lopes; David Garcia; John H Alexander; Victor F Tapson Journal: J Thromb Thrombolysis Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 2.300
Authors: Jeffrey M Riggio; Mandelin K Cooper; Benjamin E Leiby; Jeanine M Walenga; Geno J Merli; Jonathan E Gottlieb Journal: J Thromb Thrombolysis Date: 2008-10-07 Impact factor: 2.300
Authors: Craig A Umscheid; Asaf Hanish; Jesse Chittams; Mark G Weiner; Todd E H Hecht Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2012-08-31 Impact factor: 2.796
Authors: Gianfranco Damiani; Luigi Pinnarelli; Simona C Colosimo; Roberta Almiento; Lorella Sicuro; Rocco Galasso; Lorenzo Sommella; Walter Ricciardi Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2010-01-04 Impact factor: 2.655