Literature DB >> 15129753

The visual and haptic perception of natural object shape.

J Farley Norman1, Hideko F Norman, Anna Marie Clayton, Joann Lianekhammy, Gina Zielke.   

Abstract

In this study, we evaluated observers' ability to compare naturally shaped three-dimensional (3-D) objects, using their senses of vision and touch. In one experiment, the observers haptically manipulated 1 object and then indicated which of 12 visible objects possessed the same shape. In the second experiment, pairs of objects were presented, and the observers indicated whether their 3-D shape was the same or different. The 2 objects were presented either unimodally (vision-vision or haptic-haptic) or cross-modally (vision-haptic or haptic-vision). In both experiments, the observers were able to compare 3-D shape across modalities with reasonably high levels of accuracy. In Experiment 1, for example, the observers' matching performance rose to 72% correct (chance performance was 8.3%) after five experimental sessions. In Experiment 2, small (but significant) differences in performance were obtained between the unimodal vision-vision condition and the two cross-modal conditions. Taken together, the results suggest that vision and touch have functionally overlapping, but not necessarily equivalent, representations of 3-D shape.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15129753     DOI: 10.3758/bf03194883

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  35 in total

Review 1.  Tactual perception: a review of experimental variables and procedures.

Authors:  Alexandra M Fernandes; Pedro B Albuquerque
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2012-06-06

2.  Categorizing natural objects: a comparison of the visual and the haptic modalities.

Authors:  Nina Gaissert; Christian Wallraven
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Is there a 'plenhaptic' function?

Authors:  Vincent Hayward
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Hypnotizability and haptics: visual recognition of unimanually explored 'nonmeaningful' objects.

Authors:  E Castellani; G Carli; E L Santarcangelo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Effects of vision and haptics on categorizing common objects.

Authors:  Susan Haag
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2010-08-19

6.  Crossmodal enhancement in the LOC for visuohaptic object recognition over development.

Authors:  R Joanne Jao; Thomas W James; Karin Harman James
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Memory for curvature of objects: haptic touch vs. vision.

Authors:  Miriam Ittyerah; Lawrence E Marks
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2007-11

8.  Can you hear shapes you touch?

Authors:  Jung-Kyong Kim; Robert J Zatorre
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Multisensory Part-based Representations of Objects in Human Lateral Occipital Cortex.

Authors:  Goker Erdogan; Quanjing Chen; Frank E Garcea; Bradford Z Mahon; Robert A Jacobs
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  "Can touch this": Cross-modal shape categorization performance is associated with microstructural characteristics of white matter association pathways.

Authors:  Haemy Lee Masson; Christian Wallraven; Laurent Petit
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.