Literature DB >> 15129701

[18F]FDG PET as a substitute for second-look laparotomy in patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma.

Sungeun Kim1, June-Key Chung, Soon-Beom Kang, Moon-Hong Kim, Jae Min Jeong, Dong Soo Lee, Myung Chul Lee.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the prognostic value of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) with that of second-look laparotomy (SLL) in patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma following primary chemotherapy. Fifty-five patients who had undergone cytoreductive surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy for advanced ovarian carcinoma were enrolled in the study. Thirty patients underwent SLL after primary treatment (SLL group), while 25 underwent FDG PET after primary treatment without SLL (PET group) We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of the 55 patients for comparison of progression-free interval and disease-free interval between the two groups. Ovarian carcinomas recurred in 37 of the 55 patients. When the progression-free interval and the disease-free interval in patients in the PET group were compared with those in the SLL group, no significant differences were observed. The progression-free interval in the PET and SLL groups were 28.8 +/- 12.7 months and 30.6 +/- 13.7 months, respectively (P = 0.29). The disease-free interval in the negative PET group was 40.5 +/- 11.6 months, and that in the negative SLL group was 48.6 +/- 12.1 months (P = 0.12). In conclusion, FDG PET has a similar prognostic value to SLL, and can substitute for SLL in the follow-up of patients who have had ovarian carcinoma, especially when there is a high risk for recurrence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15129701     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-003-1367-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  21 in total

1.  Accuracy of CT in detection of persistent or recurrent ovarian carcinoma: correlation with second-look laparotomy.

Authors:  A J Megibow; M A Bosniak; A G Ho; U Beller; D H Hulnick; E M Beckman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  The role of 18F-fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET) in diagnosis of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  W. Schröder; M. Zimny; C. Rudlowski; U. Büll; W. Rath
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.437

3.  Whole-body PET with (fluorine-18)-2-deoxyglucose for detecting recurrent primary serous peritoneal carcinoma: An initial report.

Authors:  P H Wang; R S Liu; Y F Li; H T Ng; C C Yuan
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  Clinical aspects of second-look laparotomy in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  E Rubinstein; J B Knudsen
Journal:  Ann Chir Gynaecol       Date:  1986

5.  Experience with positron emission tomography (PET) scans in patients with ovarian cancer.

Authors:  M J Casey; N C Gupta; C K Muths
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  A second thought on second look laparotomy.

Authors:  A Bar-Am; F Kovner; J B Lessing; M Inbar; S Chaitchik; F Azem; S H Brenner; M R Peyser
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.636

7.  Ovarian cancer recurrence: role of whole-body positron emission tomography using 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy- D-glucose.

Authors:  Tatsuo Torizuka; Shuji Nobezawa; Toshihiko Kanno; Masami Futatsubashi; Etsuji Yoshikawa; Hiroyuki Okada; Munetaka Takekuma; Makoto Maeda; Yasuomi Ouchi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2002-03-19       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Survival after second-look laparotomy in advanced ovarian epithelial cancer. Study of 86 patients.

Authors:  A de Gramont; Y Drolet; C Varette; C Louvet; G Gonzalez-Canall; M Krulik; J Cady; A Pigne; L Marpeau; J Barrat
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol       Date:  1989-03

9.  Usefulness of FDG PET for assessment of early recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Song-Mee Cho; Hyun Kwon Ha; Jae Young Byun; Jae Mun Lee; Chan Joo Kim; Sung Eun Nam-Koong; Joon Mo Lee
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 10.  Second-look operation in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  K C Podratz; W K Kinney
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1993-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  9 in total

1.  Diagnostic accuracy of FDG PET in the follow-up of platinum-sensitive epithelial ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  María José García-Velloso; Matías Jurado; Carolina Ceamanos; José Manuel Aramendía; María Puy Garrastachu; Guillermo López-García; José Angel Richter
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-02-21       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  An update on the role of PET/CT and PET/MRI in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Benjapa Khiewvan; Drew A Torigian; Sahra Emamzadehfard; Koosha Paydary; Ali Salavati; Sina Houshmand; Thomas J Werner; Abass Alavi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Role of [18F]FDG PET/CT in the assessment of suspected recurrent ovarian cancer: correlation with clinical or histological findings.

Authors:  Hyun Hoon Chung; Won Jun Kang; Jae Weon Kim; Noh-Hyun Park; Yong-Sang Song; June-Key Chung; Soon-Beom Kang; Hyo-Pyo Lee
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-11-07       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 4.  Present and future role of FDG-PET/CT imaging in the management of gynecologic malignancies.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Kitajima; Yasuhiko Ebina; Kazuro Sugimura
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 2.374

5.  Monitoring the neoadjuvant therapy response in gynecological cancer patients using FDG PET.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Nishiyama; Yuka Yamamoto; Kenji Kanenishi; Masami Ohno; Toshiyuki Hata; Yoshio Kushida; Reiji Haba; Motoomi Ohkawa
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 6.  Diagnostic performance of PET/CT and PET/MR in the management of ovarian carcinoma-a literature review.

Authors:  Mayur Virarkar; Dhakshinamoorthy Ganeshan; Anjalie Tara Gulati; Sarah Palmquist; Revathy Iyer; Priya Bhosale
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-11-11

Review 7.  New ways of assessing ovarian cancer response: metabolic imaging and beyond.

Authors:  Andrea Rockall; Alice Munari; Norbert Avril
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 3.909

8.  Preoperative [F]FDG PET/CT predicts recurrence in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Hyun Hoon Chung; Hyun Woo Kwon; Keon Wook Kang; Jae Weon Kim; Noh-Hyun Park; Yong-Sang Song; Soon-Beom Kang
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 4.401

9.  Positron emission tomography in ovarian cancer: 18F-deoxy-glucose and 16alpha-18F-fluoro-17beta-estradiol PET.

Authors:  Yoshio Yoshida; Tetsuji Kurokawa; Tetuya Tsujikawa; Hidehiko Okazawa; Fumikazu Kotsuji
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 4.234

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.