Literature DB >> 12029554

Ovarian cancer recurrence: role of whole-body positron emission tomography using 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy- D-glucose.

Tatsuo Torizuka1, Shuji Nobezawa, Toshihiko Kanno, Masami Futatsubashi, Etsuji Yoshikawa, Hiroyuki Okada, Munetaka Takekuma, Makoto Maeda, Yasuomi Ouchi.   

Abstract

This study was designed to assess the value of whole-body positron emission tomography (PET) using 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy- D-glucose (FDG) for the diagnosis of recurrent ovarian cancer. Twenty-five patients who had previously undergone surgery for ovarian cancer were imaged using whole-body FDG-PET. During the 4 weeks preceding the PET study, conventional imaging, comprising computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the abdomen and/or pelvis, was performed and serum CA125 levels were measured. PET imaging was commenced at 60 min after the intravenous administration of FDG in all patients. PET results were compared with the results of conventional imaging and CA125 levels, and related to pathological findings and clinical follow-up for more than 6 months. FDG-PET showed a sensitivity of 80% (16/20), a specificity of 100% (5/5) and an accuracy of 84% accuracy (21/25) for the diagnosis of recurrent ovarian cancer. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of conventional imaging were 55% (11/20), 100% (5/5) and 64% (16/25), respectively. PET could detect recurrent lesions in seven of nine patients in whom conventional imaging was falsely normal, while conventional imaging was true positive in two of four patients with false-negative PET results. The CA125 results showed a sensitivity of 75% (15/20), a specificity of 100% (5/5) and an accuracy of 80% accuracy (20/25). Among the 15 patients with true-positive CA125 results, PET correctly detected abnormal foci of recurrence in 13 patients (86.7%) whereas conventional imaging showed recurrent lesions in only eight patients (53.3%). In conclusion, our preliminary study demonstrates that FDG-PET may be accurate and useful for the detection of tumour recurrence when conventional imaging is inconclusive or negative, especially in patients with abnormal CA125 levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12029554     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-001-0750-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  23 in total

1.  Positron emission tomography with 18F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose for the detection of recurrent ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Munetaka Takekuma; Makoto Maeda; Takachika Ozawa; Kazuhiko Yasumi; Tatsuo Torizuka
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Positron emission tomography with 18F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose for the detection of recurrent ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Yukihiro Hama
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Integrated PET/CT as a first-line re-staging modality in patients with suspected recurrence of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  G Mangili; M Picchio; S Sironi; R Viganò; E Rabaiotti; D Bornaghi; V Bettinardi; C Crivellaro; C Messa; F Fazio
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Diagnostic accuracy of FDG PET in the follow-up of platinum-sensitive epithelial ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  María José García-Velloso; Matías Jurado; Carolina Ceamanos; José Manuel Aramendía; María Puy Garrastachu; Guillermo López-García; José Angel Richter
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-02-21       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Lung metastasis from an ovarian granulosa cell tumor 36 years after the initial diagnosis: report of a case.

Authors:  Toru Kimura; Hiroyuki Shiono; Toshiki Takemoto; Yoshio Ohta
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 6.  Evaluation of follow-up strategies for patients with epithelial ovarian cancer following completion of primary treatment.

Authors:  Fiona Kew; Khadra Galaal; Andrew Bryant; Raj Naik
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-06-15

7.  What is your diagnosis?

Authors:  Cemil Yaman; Helmut Huber; Dietmar Haas; Peter Oppelt
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2012-06-01

8.  S3-Guideline on Diagnostics, Therapy and Follow-up of Malignant Ovarian Tumours: Short version 1.0 - AWMF registration number: 032/035OL, June 2013.

Authors:  U Wagner; P Harter; F Hilpert; S Mahner; A Reuß; A du Bois; E Petru; W Meier; P Ortner; K König; K Lindel; D Grab; P Piso; O Ortmann; I Runnebaum; J Pfisterer; D Lüftner; N Frickhofen; F Grünwald; B O Maier; J Diebold; S Hauptmann; F Kommoss; G Emons; B Radeleff; M Gebhardt; N Arnold; G Calaminus; I Weisse; J Weis; J Sehouli; D Fink; A Burges; A Hasenburg; C Eggert
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.915

9.  18F-FDG PET/CT evaluation of patients with ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  Andrei H Iagaru; Erik S Mittra; Iain Ross McDougall; Andrew Quon; Sanjiv Sam Gambhir
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.690

10.  The utility and cost of routine follow-up procedures in the surveillance of ovarian and primary peritoneal carcinoma: a 16-year institutional review.

Authors:  N B Rettenmaier; C R Rettenmaier; T Wojciechowski; L N Abaid; J V Brown; J P Micha; B H Goldstein
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.