Literature DB >> 17089122

Role of [18F]FDG PET/CT in the assessment of suspected recurrent ovarian cancer: correlation with clinical or histological findings.

Hyun Hoon Chung1, Won Jun Kang, Jae Weon Kim, Noh-Hyun Park, Yong-Sang Song, June-Key Chung, Soon-Beom Kang, Hyo-Pyo Lee.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of integrated positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT) for depiction of suspected recurrent ovarian carcinoma after treatment, with use of clinical or histological findings as the reference standard.
METHODS: Seventy-seven women (median age, 51 years) with ovarian carcinoma treated with primary cytoreductive surgery followed by platinum-based combination chemotherapy were included, and [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT was performed for suspected recurrence. In all patients, imaging findings were compared with results of histological examination after surgical exploration or clinical follow-up to determine the diagnostic accuracy of PET/CT in the evaluation of disease status. Fisher's exact test was used to measure the ability of PET/CT to predict recurrent lesions.
RESULTS: Forty-five (58.4%) of the 77 patients had documented recurrence during surgical exploration or clinical follow-up, while 32 (41.6%) had no evidence of recurrent tumour. Of the 45 patients with recurrent disease, 27 (60%) were confirmed to have recurrence by surgical biopsy. A correlation was found between PET/CT and histological or clinical analyses (kappa = 0.894). The overall sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of PET/CT were 93.3%, 96.9%, 94.8%, 97.7% and 91.2%, respectively. PET/CT modified the diagnostic or treatment plan in 19 (24.7%) patients, by leading to the use of previously unplanned therapeutic procedures in 11 (57.9%) patients and the avoidance of previously planned diagnostic procedures in eight (42.1%) patients.
CONCLUSION: Integrated FDG PET/CT is a sensitive post-therapy surveillance modality for the detection of recurrent ovarian cancer; it aids decisions on treatment plans and may ultimately have a favourable impact on prognosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17089122     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-006-0260-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  34 in total

1.  Combined PET/CT Imaging in Oncology. Impact on Patient Management.

Authors:  P G. Kluetz; C C. Meltzer; V L. Villemagne; P E. Kinahan; S Chander; M A. Martinelli; D W. Townsend
Journal:  Clin Positron Imaging       Date:  2000-11

2.  Positron emission tomography for detecting clinically occult surgically resectable metastatic ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Robert E Bristow; Fiona Simpkins; Harpreet K Pannu; Elliot K Fishman; F J Montz
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Image analysis in patients with cancer studied with a combined PET and CT scanner.

Authors:  M Charron; T Beyer; N N Bohnen; P E Kinahan; M Dachille; J Jerin; R Nutt; C C Meltzer; V Villemagne; D W Townsend
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 7.794

4.  A model for predicting surgical outcome in patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma using computed tomography.

Authors:  R E Bristow; L R Duska; N C Lambrou; E K Fishman; M J O'Neill; E L Trimble; F J Montz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 5.  Normal physiological and benign pathological variants of 18-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron-emission tomography scanning: potential for error in interpretation.

Authors:  G J Cook; I Fogelman; M N Maisey
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.446

6.  Ovarian cancer recurrence: role of whole-body positron emission tomography using 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy- D-glucose.

Authors:  Tatsuo Torizuka; Shuji Nobezawa; Toshihiko Kanno; Masami Futatsubashi; Etsuji Yoshikawa; Hiroyuki Okada; Munetaka Takekuma; Makoto Maeda; Yasuomi Ouchi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2002-03-19       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 7.  PET imaging in gynecologic malignancies.

Authors:  Rakesh Kumar; Abass Alavi
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.303

8.  Positron emission tomography with FDG in the detection of peritoneal and retroperitoneal metastases of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  O Drieskens; S Stroobants; M Gysen; G Vandenbosch; L Mortelmans; I Vergote
Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Invest       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 9.  Imaging of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  R Forstner; M Chen; H Hricak
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1995 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  PET attenuation coefficients from CT images: experimental evaluation of the transformation of CT into PET 511-keV attenuation coefficients.

Authors:  C Burger; G Goerres; S Schoenes; A Buck; A H R Lonn; G K Von Schulthess
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2002-04-19       Impact factor: 9.236

View more
  18 in total

1.  What is your diagnosis?

Authors:  Cemil Yaman; Helmut Huber; Dietmar Haas; Peter Oppelt
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2012-06-01

2.  Differential Diagnosis of Borderline Ovarian Tumors from Stage I Malignant Ovarian Tumors using FDG PET/CT.

Authors:  Chulhan Kim; Hyun Hoon Chung; So Won Oh; Keon Wook Kang; June-Key Chung; Dong Soo Lee
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-04-04

3.  The role of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in the assessment of suspected recurrent gastric cancer after initial surgical resection: can the results of FDG PET/CT influence patients' treatment decision making?

Authors:  Ahmet Bilici; Bala Basak Oven Ustaalioglu; Mesut Seker; Umut Kefeli; Nesrin Canpolat; Bulent Tekinsoy; Sule Ozugur; Mahmut Gumus
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Post-treatment [¹⁸F]FDG maximum standardized uptake value as a prognostic marker of recurrence in endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Hyun Hoon Chung; Jae Weon Kim; Keon Wook Kang; Noh-Hyun Park; Yong-Sang Song; June-Key Chung; Soon-Beom Kang
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Clinical value of FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis of suspected recurrent ovarian cancer: is there an impact of FDG PET/CT on patient management?

Authors:  Ahmet Bilici; Bala Basak Oven Ustaalioglu; Mesut Seker; Nesrin Canpolat; Bulent Tekinsoy; Taflan Salepci; Mahmut Gumus
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 6.  Present and future role of FDG-PET/CT imaging in the management of gynecologic malignancies.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Kitajima; Yasuhiko Ebina; Kazuro Sugimura
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 2.374

7.  Diagnostic accuracy of integrated FDG-PET/contrast-enhanced CT in staging ovarian cancer: comparison with enhanced CT.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Kitajima; Koji Murakami; Erena Yamasaki; Yasushi Kaji; Ichio Fukasawa; Noriyuki Inaba; Kazuro Sugimura
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Performance of integrated FDG-PET/contrast-enhanced CT in the diagnosis of recurrent ovarian cancer: comparison with integrated FDG-PET/non-contrast-enhanced CT and enhanced CT.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Kitajima; Koji Murakami; Erena Yamasaki; Yasushi Domeki; Yasushi Kaji; Ichio Fukasawa; Noriyuki Inaba; Narufumi Suganuma; Kazuro Sugimura
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-04-17       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Detecting peritoneal dissemination of ovarian cancer in mice by DWIBS.

Authors:  Hye Jeong Lee; Jeffrey J Luci; Mohammed N Tantawy; Haakil Lee; Ki Taek Nam; Todd E Peterson; Ronald R Price
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 10.  Diagnostic performance of PET/CT and PET/MR in the management of ovarian carcinoma-a literature review.

Authors:  Mayur Virarkar; Dhakshinamoorthy Ganeshan; Anjalie Tara Gulati; Sarah Palmquist; Revathy Iyer; Priya Bhosale
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-11-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.