Literature DB >> 15129699

[18F]FDG in recurrent breast cancer: diagnostic performances, clinical impact and relevance of induced changes in management.

Dany Grahek1, Françoise Montravers, Khaldoun Kerrou, Nicolas Aide, Jean-Pierre Lotz, Jean-Noël Talbot.   

Abstract

Prognosis and management of patients with recurrent breast cancer depend on the spread of the disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose gamma camera positron emission tomography (FDG-GPET) in detecting breast cancer recurrence, its clinical impact and the relevance of induced changes in management. Patients (n = 134) with suspicion of recurrence either clinically or on conventional imaging (suspected recurrence: SR) or with an isolated increase in tumour marker levels (occult recurrence: OR) underwent FDG-GPET on a coincidence gamma camera. The reference standard for evaluation of accuracy, either histology (n = 26) or follow-up for 1 year (n = 49), was available in 75 (56%) patients. A questionnaire was sent to the referring clinician to evaluate the impact of FDG on management. Responses were obtained for 75 patients. Information regarding both approaches was available for 46 patients (46/134 = 34%). At the patient level, the sensitivity of FDG-GPET was 84%, significantly higher than the 63% sensitivity for conventional modalities, and the specificity was 78% versus 61%. The values for FDG-GPET were 81% and 86% respectively in the SR group and 90% and 73% respectively in the OR group, without any significant difference between these settings. The rate of change in management was 44% overall, 43% in the SR group and 45% in the OR group. Within the two groups, intermodality (major) changes were more frequent than intramodality (minor) changes. In the 46 patients for whom both approaches were available, 93% of management modifications were relevant (validated by biopsy or clinical follow-up). The results of this retrospective study show that FDG-GPET has an important role to play in patient management by confirming and evaluating the extent of recurrence or by localising occult recurrence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15129699     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-003-1348-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  30 in total

1.  Comparative evaluation of lesion detectability for 6 PET imaging platforms using a highly reproducible whole-body phantom with (22)Na lesions and localization ROC analysis.

Authors:  Dan J Kadrmas; Paul E Christian
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Carcinomatous versus radiation-induced brachial plexus neuropathy in breast cancer.

Authors:  F H Bagley; J W Walsh; B Cady; F A Salzman; R A Oberfield; A G Pazianos
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Comparison of dual-head coincidence gamma camera FDG imaging with FDG PET in detection of breast cancer and axillary lymph node metastasis.

Authors:  K Yutani; M Tatsumi; E Shiba; H Kusuoka; T Nishimura
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  FDG PET evaluation of mucinous neoplasms: correlation of FDG uptake with histopathologic features.

Authors:  K L Berger; S A Nicholson; F Dehdashti; B A Siegel
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Circulating CA 15-3 levels in the postsurgical follow-up of breast cancer patients and in non-malignant diseases.

Authors:  R Colomer; A Ruibal; J Genollá; D Rubio; J M Del Campo; R Bodi; L Salvador
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for detection of recurrent or metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  T S Kim; W K Moon; D S Lee; J K Chung; M C Lee; Y K Youn; S K Oh; K J Choe; D Y Noh
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Comparison of dual-head coincidence PET versus ring PET in tumor patients.

Authors:  C Landoni; L Gianolli; G Lucignani; P Magnani; A Savi; L Travaini; M C Gilardi; F Fazio
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Impact of whole-body 18F-FDG PET on staging and managing patients with breast cancer: the referring physician's perspective.

Authors:  C S Yap; M A Seltzer; C Schiepers; S S Gambhir; J Rao; M E Phelps; P E Valk; J Czernin
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Detection of occult disease in breast cancer using fluorodeoxyglucose camera-based positron emission tomography.

Authors:  A P Pecking; C Mechelany-Corone; F Bertrand-Kermorgant; J L Alberini; J L Floiras; A Goupil; M F Pichon
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Imaging of oncologic patients: benefit of combined CT and FDG PET in the diagnosis of malignancy.

Authors:  W B Eubank; D A Mankoff; U P Schmiedl; T C Winter; E R Fisher; A B Olshen; M M Graham; J F Eary
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  FDG-PET in monitoring therapy of breast cancer.

Authors:  H-J Biersack; H Bender; H Palmedo
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-04-27       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  FDG-PET/CT compared with conventional imaging in the detection of distant metastases of primary breast cancer.

Authors:  Naoki Niikura; Colleen M Costelloe; John E Madewell; Naoki Hayashi; Tse-Kuan Yu; Jun Liu; Shana L Palla; Yutaka Tokuda; Richard L Theriault; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Naoto T Ueno
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2011-07-17

3.  Disease Restaging and Diagnosis of Recurrent and Metastatic Disease Following Primary Therapy with FDG-PET Imaging.

Authors:  William B Eubank; Jean H Lee; David A Mankoff
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2009-07-01

4.  Value of fourth and subsequent post-therapy follow-up 18F-FDG PET/CT scans in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Mehdi Taghipour; Sara Sheikhbahaei; Tyler J Trahan; Rathan M Subramaniam
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.690

Review 5.  Opportunities for PET to deliver clinical benefit in cancer: breast cancer as a paradigm.

Authors:  Ian N Fleming; Fiona J Gilbert; Ken A Miles; David Cameron
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 3.909

6.  Role of 2-[18F] fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the post-therapy surveillance of breast cancer.

Authors:  Hong-Tai Chang; Chin Hu; Yu-Li Chiu; Nan-Jing Peng; Ren-Shyan Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The utility of 18 F-FDG PET/CT for suspected recurrent breast cancer: impact and prognostic stratification.

Authors:  Alexandre Cochet; Steven David; Kate Moodie; Elizabeth Drummond; Gaelle Dutu; Michael MacManus; Boon Chua; Rodney J Hicks
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 3.909

8.  The role of PET/CT for evaluating breast cancer.

Authors:  Sang Kyu Yang; Nariya Cho; Woo Kyung Moon
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.500

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.