OBJECTIVE: This manuscript examines the impact of mental health state and specific mental and physical disorders on work role disability and quality of life in six European countries. METHOD: The ESEMeD study was conducted in: Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and Spain. Individuals aged 18 years and over who were not institutionalized were eligible for an in-home computer-assisted interview. Common mental disorders, work loss days (WLD) in the past month and quality of life (QoL) were assessed, using the WMH-2000 version of the CIDI, the WHODAS-II, and the mental and physical component scores (MCS, PCS) of the 12-item short form, respectively. The presence of five chronic physical disorders: arthritis, heart disease, lung disease, diabetes and neurological disease was also assessed. Multivariate regression techniques were used to identify the independent association of mental and physical disorders while controlling for gender, age and country. RESULTS: In each country, WLD and loss of QoL increased with the number of disorders. Most mental disorders had approximately 1.0 SD-unit lower mean MCS and lost three to four times more work days, compared with people without any 12-month mental disorder. The 10 disorders with the highest independent impact on WLD were: neurological disease, panic disorder, PTSD, major depressive episode, dysthymia, specific phobia, social phobia, arthritis, agoraphobia and heart disease. The impact of mental vs. physical disorders on QoL was specific, with mental disorders impacting more on MCS and physical disorders more on PCS. Compared to physical disorders, mental disorders had generally stronger 'cross-domain' effects. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that mental disorders are important determinants of work role disability and quality of life, often outnumbering the impact of common chronic physical disorders.
OBJECTIVE: This manuscript examines the impact of mental health state and specific mental and physical disorders on work role disability and quality of life in six European countries. METHOD: The ESEMeD study was conducted in: Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and Spain. Individuals aged 18 years and over who were not institutionalized were eligible for an in-home computer-assisted interview. Common mental disorders, work loss days (WLD) in the past month and quality of life (QoL) were assessed, using the WMH-2000 version of the CIDI, the WHODAS-II, and the mental and physical component scores (MCS, PCS) of the 12-item short form, respectively. The presence of five chronic physical disorders: arthritis, heart disease, lung disease, diabetes and neurological disease was also assessed. Multivariate regression techniques were used to identify the independent association of mental and physical disorders while controlling for gender, age and country. RESULTS: In each country, WLD and loss of QoL increased with the number of disorders. Most mental disorders had approximately 1.0 SD-unit lower mean MCS and lost three to four times more work days, compared with people without any 12-month mental disorder. The 10 disorders with the highest independent impact on WLD were: neurological disease, panic disorder, PTSD, major depressive episode, dysthymia, specific phobia, social phobia, arthritis, agoraphobia and heart disease. The impact of mental vs. physical disorders on QoL was specific, with mental disorders impacting more on MCS and physical disorders more on PCS. Compared to physical disorders, mental disorders had generally stronger 'cross-domain' effects. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that mental disorders are important determinants of work role disability and quality of life, often outnumbering the impact of common chronic physical disorders.
Authors: Ronny Bruffaerts; Gemma Vilagut; Koen Demyttenaere; Jordi Alonso; Ali Alhamzawi; Laura Helena Andrade; Corina Benjet; Evelyn Bromet; Brendan Bunting; Giovanni de Girolamo; Silvia Florescu; Oye Gureje; Josep Maria Haro; Yanling He; Hristo Hinkov; Chiyi Hu; Elie G Karam; Jean-Pierre Lepine; Daphna Levinson; Herbert Matschinger; Yoshibumi Nakane; Johan Ormel; Jose Posada-Villa; Kate M Scott; Matthew Varghese; David R Williams; Miguel Xavier; Ronald C Kessler Journal: Br J Psychiatry Date: 2012-04-26 Impact factor: 9.319
Authors: Ron de Graaf; Marlous Tuithof; Saskia van Dorsselaer; Margreet ten Have Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2012-03-21 Impact factor: 4.328
Authors: Thomas Dresler; Anne Guhn; Sara V Tupak; Ann-Christine Ehlis; Martin J Herrmann; Andreas J Fallgatter; Jürgen Deckert; Katharina Domschke Journal: J Neural Transm (Vienna) Date: 2012-06-13 Impact factor: 3.575
Authors: Angelo d'Errico; Mario Cardano; Tania Landriscina; Chiara Marinacci; Sherri Pasian; Alessio Petrelli; Giuseppe Costa Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2010-10-16 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Ifigeneia Mavranezouli; Odette Megnin-Viggars; Nick Grey; Gita Bhutani; Jonathan Leach; Caitlin Daly; Sofia Dias; Nicky J Welton; Cornelius Katona; Sharif El-Leithy; Neil Greenberg; Sarah Stockton; Stephen Pilling Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-04-30 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Brandon L Goldstein; Greg Perlman; Roman Kotov; Joan E Broderick; Keke Liu; Camilo Ruggero; Daniel N Klein Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2016-10-11 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: A Antunes; D Frasquilho; S Azeredo-Lopes; M Silva; G Cardoso; J M Caldas-de-Almeida Journal: Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci Date: 2018-08-06 Impact factor: 6.892