AIMS: Portugal was one of the European countries most affected by the period of economic recession initiated in 2008. Social inequalities are likely to widen during such periods and disproportionately affect people with mental disorders. The present study aims to compare self-reported changes in indicators of socioeconomic position during the economic recession in Portugal among people with and without mental disorders in the beginning of this period. Three dimensions were assessed, namely employment situation, experiences of financial hardship and subjective social status. METHODS: Data from the World Mental Health Survey Initiative Portugal (2008/2009) and from the National Mental Health Survey Follow-up (2015/2016) were used (n = 911). Multinomial and logistic recession models were performed to examine the association between the presence of any 12-month mood or anxiety mental disorder in 2008/2009 and indicators of socioeconomic position in 2015/2016. All analyses were adjusted for gender, age, presence of any physical disorder and education at the baseline. RESULTS: Participants that had any mental disorder in the beginning of the economic recession reported 2.20 (95% CI 1.31-3.71; P < 0.01) higher odds of financial hardship related to daily life in 2015/2016, when compared with those without any mental disorder, after adjusting for age, gender, education and presence of any physical disorder. The results may also suggest a pattern of increased socioeconomic disadvantage among people with prior mental disorder, despite not reaching statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that the economic recession may have contributed to wider social inequalities between people with and without mental disorders. Policies to support these individuals, such as access to treatment and alleviation of financial hardship, should be a priority in times of economic downturn.
AIMS: Portugal was one of the European countries most affected by the period of economic recession initiated in 2008. Social inequalities are likely to widen during such periods and disproportionately affect people with mental disorders. The present study aims to compare self-reported changes in indicators of socioeconomic position during the economic recession in Portugal among people with and without mental disorders in the beginning of this period. Three dimensions were assessed, namely employment situation, experiences of financial hardship and subjective social status. METHODS: Data from the World Mental Health Survey Initiative Portugal (2008/2009) and from the National Mental Health Survey Follow-up (2015/2016) were used (n = 911). Multinomial and logistic recession models were performed to examine the association between the presence of any 12-month mood or anxiety mental disorder in 2008/2009 and indicators of socioeconomic position in 2015/2016. All analyses were adjusted for gender, age, presence of any physical disorder and education at the baseline. RESULTS:Participants that had any mental disorder in the beginning of the economic recession reported 2.20 (95% CI 1.31-3.71; P < 0.01) higher odds of financial hardship related to daily life in 2015/2016, when compared with those without any mental disorder, after adjusting for age, gender, education and presence of any physical disorder. The results may also suggest a pattern of increased socioeconomic disadvantage among people with prior mental disorder, despite not reaching statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that the economic recession may have contributed to wider social inequalities between people with and without mental disorders. Policies to support these individuals, such as access to treatment and alleviation of financial hardship, should be a priority in times of economic downturn.
Entities:
Keywords:
Common mental disorders; epidemiology; mental health; population survey; social factors
Authors: Marina Karanikolos; Philipa Mladovsky; Jonathan Cylus; Sarah Thomson; Sanjay Basu; David Stuckler; Johan P Mackenbach; Martin McKee Journal: Lancet Date: 2013-03-27 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Josep Maria Haro; Saena Arbabzadeh-Bouchez; Traolach S Brugha; Giovanni de Girolamo; Margaret E Guyer; Robert Jin; Jean Pierre Lepine; Fausto Mazzi; Blanca Reneses; Gemma Vilagut; Nancy A Sampson; Ronald C Kessler Journal: Int J Methods Psychiatr Res Date: 2006 Impact factor: 4.035
Authors: Kate M Scott; Ali Obaid Al-Hamzawi; Laura H Andrade; Guilherme Borges; Jose Miguel Caldas-de-Almeida; Fabian Fiestas; Oye Gureje; Chiyi Hu; Elie G Karam; Norito Kawakami; Sing Lee; Daphna Levinson; Carmen C W Lim; Fernando Navarro-Mateu; Michail Okoliyski; Jose Posada-Villa; Yolanda Torres; David R Williams; Victoria Zakhozha; Ronald C Kessler Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2014-12-01 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: Ronald C Kessler; Sergio Aguilar-Gaxiola; Jordi Alonso; Somnath Chatterji; Sing Lee; Johan Ormel; T Bedirhan Ustün; Philip S Wang Journal: Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc Date: 2009 Jan-Mar
Authors: Ronald C Kessler; Steven Heeringa; Matthew D Lakoma; Maria Petukhova; Agnes E Rupp; Michael Schoenbaum; Philip S Wang; Alan M Zaslavsky Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2008-05-07 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Bruna Galobardes; Mary Shaw; Debbie A Lawlor; John W Lynch; George Davey Smith Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: Helena Legido-Quigley; Marina Karanikolos; Sonia Hernandez-Plaza; Cláudia de Freitas; Luís Bernardo; Beatriz Padilla; Rita Sá Machado; Karla Diaz-Ordaz; David Stuckler; Martin McKee Journal: Health Policy Date: 2016-04-27 Impact factor: 2.980
Authors: Manuela Silva; Ana Antunes; Sofia Azeredo-Lopes; Graça Cardoso; Miguel Xavier; Benedetto Saraceno; José Miguel Caldas-de-Almeida Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2020-05-11 Impact factor: 3.630