Literature DB >> 15126164

Predominant loss of the photopic negative response in central retinal artery occlusion.

Shigeki Machida1, Yasutaka Gotoh, Michiko Tanaka, Yutaka Tazawa.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine how the photopic negative response (PhNR) is affected in central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO).
DESIGN: Observational case series.
METHODS: Seven patients with unilateral CRAO were included. Full-field scotopic and photopic electroretinograms (ERGs) including the PhNR were recorded. Each ERG amplitude in the affected eye was expressed as a percentage of amplitude of the corresponding wave in the unaffected eye.
RESULTS: Mean of the PhNR amplitude was reduced to 12.3 +/- 11.7% of that of unaffected eyes whereas the cone b-wave amplitude was attenuated to only 73.4 +/- 30.4%. This reduction of the PhNR amplitude was more significant than that of other waves including the rod b-wave, maximum a-wave and b-wave, cone a-wave and b-wave, and 30 Hz flicker ERG (P <.005).
CONCLUSIONS: The PhNR was severely affected in CRAO despite relative preservation of the cone b-wave, implicating massive loss of ganglion cells and their axons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15126164     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2003.10.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  38 in total

1.  The photopic negative response of the flash electroretinogram in retinal vein occlusion.

Authors:  Hongling Chen; Dezheng Wu; Shizhou Huang; Hong Yan
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Effects of Spectral Characteristics of Ganzfeld Stimuli on the Photopic Negative Response (PhNR) of the ERG.

Authors:  Nalini V Rangaswamy; Suguru Shirato; Muneyoshi Kaneko; Beth I Digby; John G Robson; Laura J Frishman
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  The effect of broadband and monochromatic stimuli on the photopic negative response of the electroretinogram in normal subjects and in open-angle glaucoma patients.

Authors:  Maja Sustar; Barbara Cvenkel; Jelka Brecelj
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-10-19       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  The relationship between stimulus intensity and response amplitude for the photopic negative response of the flash electroretinogram.

Authors:  A M Binns; K E Mortlock; R V North
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Electroretinography can provide objective assessment of inner retinal function prior to atrophic change on OCT.

Authors:  O A Mahroo
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Test-retest reliability of the multifocal photopic negative response.

Authors:  Anthony W Van Alstine; Suresh Viswanathan
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  Intensity response function of the photopic negative response (PhNR): effect of age and test-retest reliability.

Authors:  Nabin R Joshi; Emma Ly; Suresh Viswanathan
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 2.379

8.  Comparisons of cone electroretinograms after indocyanine green-, brilliant blue G-, or triamcinolone acetonide-assisted macular hole surgery.

Authors:  Shigeki Machida; Yoshiharu Toba; Tomoharu Nishimura; Takayuki Ohzeki; Ken-ichi Murai; Daijiro Kurosaka
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-03-02       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Clinical applications of photopic negative response (PhNR) for the treatment of glaucoma and diabetic retinopathy.

Authors:  Hoon Dong Kim; Joo Youn Park; Young-Hoon Ohn
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-04-06

10.  Comparison of photopic negative response of full-field and focal electroretinograms in detecting glaucomatous eyes.

Authors:  Shigeki Machida; Kunifusa Tamada; Taku Oikawa; Yasutaka Gotoh; Tomoharu Nishimura; Muneyoshi Kaneko; Daijiro Kurosaka
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 1.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.