Literature DB >> 15123579

Analysis of segmental duplications and genome assembly in the mouse.

Jeffrey A Bailey1, Deanna M Church, Mario Ventura, Mariano Rocchi, Evan E Eichler.   

Abstract

Limited comparative studies suggest that the human genome is particularly enriched for recent segmental duplications. The extent of segmental duplications in other mammalian genomes is unknown and confounded by methodological differences in genome assembly. Here, we present a detailed analysis of recent duplication content within the mouse genome using a whole-genome assembly comparison method and a novel assembly independent method, designed to take advantage of the reduced allelic variation of the C57BL/6J strain. We conservatively estimate that approximately 57% of all highly identical segmental duplications (>or=90%) were misassembled or collapsed within the working draft WGS assembly. The WGS approach often leaves duplications fragmented and unassigned to a chromosome when compared with the clone-ordered-based approach. Our preliminary analysis suggests that 1.7%-2.0% of the mouse genome is part of recent large segmental duplications (about half of what is observed for the human genome). We have constructed a mouse segmental duplication database to aid in the characterization of these regions and their integration into the final mouse genome assembly. This work suggests significant biological differences in the architecture of recent segmental duplications between human and mouse. In addition, our unique method provides the means for improving whole-genome shotgun sequence assembly of mouse and future mammalian genomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15123579      PMCID: PMC479105          DOI: 10.1101/gr.2238404

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Res        ISSN: 1088-9051            Impact factor:   9.043


  51 in total

1.  A 1.5 million-base pair inversion polymorphism in families with Williams-Beuren syndrome.

Authors:  L R Osborne; M Li; B Pober; D Chitayat; J Bodurtha; A Mandel; T Costa; T Grebe; S Cox; L C Tsui; S W Scherer
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 2.  Eukaryotic domain evolution inferred from genome comparisons.

Authors:  Richard R Copley; Leo Goodstadt; Chris Ponting
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.578

3.  A vision for the future of genomics research.

Authors:  Francis S Collins; Eric D Green; Alan E Guttmacher; Mark S Guyer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-04-14       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  The evolutionary chromosome translocation 4;19 in Gorilla gorilla is associated with microduplication of the chromosome fragment syntenic to sequences surrounding the human proximal CMT1A-REP.

Authors:  P Stankiewicz; S S Park; K Inoue; J R Lupski
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 5.  Repetitive conundrums of centromere structure and function.

Authors:  E E Eichler
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 6.150

6.  ARACHNE: a whole-genome shotgun assembler.

Authors:  Serafim Batzoglou; David B Jaffe; Ken Stanley; Jonathan Butler; Sante Gnerre; Evan Mauceli; Bonnie Berger; Jill P Mesirov; Eric S Lander
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 7.  Genomic disorders: structural features of the genome can lead to DNA rearrangements and human disease traits.

Authors:  J R Lupski
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 11.639

8.  Rapid amplification of a retrotransposon subfamily is evolving the mouse genome.

Authors:  R J DeBerardinis; J L Goodier; E M Ostertag; H H Kazazian
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  The ancestral gene for transcribed, low-copy repeats in the Prader-Willi/Angelman region encodes a large protein implicated in protein trafficking, which is deficient in mice with neuromuscular and spermiogenic abnormalities.

Authors:  Y Ji; M J Walkowicz; K Buiting; D K Johnson; R E Tarvin; E M Rinchik; B Horsthemke; L Stubbs; R D Nicholls
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 6.150

10.  Integration of cytogenetic landmarks into the draft sequence of the human genome.

Authors:  V G Cheung; N Nowak; W Jang; I R Kirsch; S Zhao; X N Chen; T S Furey; U J Kim; W L Kuo; M Olivier; J Conroy; A Kasprzyk; H Massa; R Yonescu; S Sait; C Thoreen; A Snijders; E Lemyre; J A Bailey; A Bruzel; W D Burrill; S M Clegg; S Collins; P Dhami; C Friedman; C S Han; S Herrick; J Lee; A H Ligon; S Lowry; M Morley; S Narasimhan; K Osoegawa; Z Peng; I Plajzer-Frick; B J Quade; D Scott; K Sirotkin; A A Thorpe; J W Gray; J Hudson; D Pinkel; T Ried; L Rowen; G L Shen-Ong; R L Strausberg; E Birney; D F Callen; J F Cheng; D R Cox; N A Doggett; N P Carter; E E Eichler; D Haussler; J R Korenberg; C C Morton; D Albertson; G Schuler; P J de Jong; B J Trask
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-02-15       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  54 in total

1.  An intermediate grade of finished genomic sequence suitable for comparative analyses.

Authors:  Robert W Blakesley; Nancy F Hansen; James C Mullikin; Pamela J Thomas; Jennifer C McDowell; Baishali Maskeri; Alice C Young; Beatrice Benjamin; Shelise Y Brooks; Bradley I Coleman; Jyoti Gupta; Shi-Ling Ho; Eric M Karlins; Quino L Maduro; Sirintorn Stantripop; Cyrus Tsurgeon; Jennifer L Vogt; Michelle A Walker; Catherine A Masiello; Xiaobin Guan; Gerard G Bouffard; Eric D Green
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-10-12       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  An integrated SSR map of grapevine based on five mapping populations.

Authors:  A Doligez; A F Adam-Blondon; G Cipriani; G Di Gaspero; V Laucou; D Merdinoglu; C P Meredith; S Riaz; C Roux; P This
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2006-06-24       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  The neutral coalescent process for recent gene duplications and copy-number variants.

Authors:  Kevin R Thornton
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-08-24       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  Comparative genomics and molecular dynamics of DNA repeats in eukaryotes.

Authors:  Guy-Franck Richard; Alix Kerrest; Bernard Dujon
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 11.056

5.  Quantifying the mechanisms for segmental duplications in mammalian genomes by statistical analysis and modeling.

Authors:  Yi Zhou; Bud Mishra
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-03-01       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Segmental trisomy of chromosome 17: a mouse model of human aneuploidy syndromes.

Authors:  Tomás Vacík; Michael Ort; Sona Gregorová; Petr Strnad; Radek Blatny; Nathalie Conte; Allan Bradley; Jan Bures; Jirí Forejt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-03-08       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Lgals6, a 2-million-year-old gene in mice: a case of positive Darwinian selection and presence/absence polymorphism.

Authors:  Denis Houzelstein; Isabelle R Gonçalves; Annie Orth; François Bonhomme; Pierre Netter
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  A critical assessment of cross-species detection of gene duplicates using comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  Heather E Machado; Suzy C P Renn
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  Detection and correction of false segmental duplications caused by genome mis-assembly.

Authors:  David R Kelley; Steven L Salzberg
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 13.583

10.  Analysis of recent segmental duplications in the bovine genome.

Authors:  George E Liu; Mario Ventura; Angelo Cellamare; Lin Chen; Ze Cheng; Bin Zhu; Congjun Li; Jiuzhou Song; Evan E Eichler
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.