Literature DB >> 14638325

Eukaryotic domain evolution inferred from genome comparisons.

Richard R Copley1, Leo Goodstadt, Chris Ponting.   

Abstract

Comparative analyses of eukaryotic genomes are providing insights into the mode and tempo of domain family evolution. Gene duplication, the source of family expansion, far exceeds the rate of emergence of domains from non-coding sequence, and the rate of recruitment of domains into novel architectures. Domain families that appear to be restricted to certain lineages are likely to be the result of gene duplication, coupled with rapid sequence diversification. If such families are evidence of past adaptation, then their functions must relate to the underlying mechanism of selection: competition among organisms.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14638325     DOI: 10.1016/j.gde.2003.10.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev        ISSN: 0959-437X            Impact factor:   5.578


  18 in total

1.  Estimating the tempo and mode of gene family evolution from comparative genomic data.

Authors:  Matthew W Hahn; Tijl De Bie; Jason E Stajich; Chi Nguyen; Nello Cristianini
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Intrinsically disordered domains: Sequence ➔ disorder ➔ function relationships.

Authors:  Jianhong Zhou; Christopher J Oldfield; Wenying Yan; Bairong Shen; A Keith Dunker
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 3.  Noise in cellular signaling pathways: causes and effects.

Authors:  John E Ladbury; Stefan T Arold
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 13.807

4.  Comparative evolutionary genomics of androgen-binding protein genes.

Authors:  Richard D Emes; Matthew C Riley; Christina M Laukaitis; Leo Goodstadt; Robert C Karn; Chris P Ponting
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  Adaptive Evolution Hotspots at the GC-Extremes of the Human Genome: Evidence for Two Functionally Distinct Pathways of Positive Selection.

Authors:  Clara S M Tang; Richard J Epstein
Journal:  Adv Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-05-03

6.  Analysis of the Drosophila melanogaster testes transcriptome reveals coordinate regulation of paralogous genes.

Authors:  Lyudmila M Mikhaylova; Kimberly Nguyen; Dmitry I Nurminsky
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  The ATL gene family from Arabidopsis thaliana and Oryza sativa comprises a large number of putative ubiquitin ligases of the RING-H2 type.

Authors:  Mario Serrano; Socorro Parra; Luis D Alcaraz; Plinio Guzmán
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 2.395

8.  Expression of ribosomal protein L22e family members in Drosophila melanogaster: rpL22-like is differentially expressed and alternatively spliced.

Authors:  Michael G Kearse; Alex S Chen; Vassie C Ware
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  A structural split in the human genome.

Authors:  Clara S M Tang; Richard J Epstein
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-07-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Analysis of segmental duplications and genome assembly in the mouse.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Bailey; Deanna M Church; Mario Ventura; Mariano Rocchi; Evan E Eichler
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 9.043

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.