Literature DB >> 9806550

Rapid amplification of a retrotransposon subfamily is evolving the mouse genome.

R J DeBerardinis1, J L Goodier, E M Ostertag, H H Kazazian.   

Abstract

Retrotransposition affects genome structure by increasing repetition and producing insertional mutations. Dispersion of the retrotransposon L1 throughout mammalian genomes suggests that L1 activity might be an important evolutionary force. Here we report that L1 retrotransposition contributes to rapid genome evolution in the mouse, because a number of L1 sequences from the T(F) subfamily are retrotransposition competent. We show that the T(F) subfamily is large, young and expanding, containing approximately 4,800 full-length members in strain 129. Eleven randomly isolated, full-length T(F) elements averaged 99.8% sequence identity to each other, and seven of these retrotransposed in cultured cells. Thus, we estimate that the mouse genome contains approximately 3,000 active T(F) elements, 75 times the estimated number of active human L1s. Moreover, as T(F) elements are polymorphic among closely related mice, they have retrotransposed recently, implying rapid amplification of the subfamily to yield genomes with different patterns of interspersed repetition. Our data show that mice and humans differ considerably in the number of active L1s, and probably differ in the contribution of retrotransposition to ongoing sequence evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9806550     DOI: 10.1038/3104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Genet        ISSN: 1061-4036            Impact factor:   38.330


  49 in total

1.  A double-strand break in a chromosomal LINE element can be repaired by gene conversion with various endogenous LINE elements in mouse cells.

Authors:  A Tremblay; M Jasin; P Chartrand
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  The end of the LINE?: lack of recent L1 activity in a group of South American rodents.

Authors:  N C Casavant; L Scott; M A Cantrell; L E Wiggins; R J Baker; H A Wichman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Determination of L1 retrotransposition kinetics in cultured cells.

Authors:  E M Ostertag; E T Prak; R J DeBerardinis; J V Moran; H H Kazazian
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-03-15       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Retrofitting the genome: L1 extinction follows endogenous retroviral expansion in a group of muroid rodents.

Authors:  Issac K Erickson; Michael A Cantrell; LuAnn Scott; Holly A Wichman
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 5.  A LINE-1 component to human aging: do LINE elements exact a longevity cost for evolutionary advantage?

Authors:  Georges St Laurent; Neil Hammell; Timothy A McCaffrey
Journal:  Mech Ageing Dev       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 5.432

6.  Phosphorylation of ORF1p is required for L1 retrotransposition.

Authors:  Pamela R Cook; Charles E Jones; Anthony V Furano
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Loss of LINE-1 activity in the megabats.

Authors:  Michael A Cantrell; LuAnn Scott; Celeste J Brown; Armando R Martinez; Holly A Wichman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 8.  Murine endogenous retroviruses.

Authors:  C Stocking; C A Kozak
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 9.261

9.  Environmental influence on L1 retrotransposons in the adult hippocampus.

Authors:  Alysson R Muotri; Chunmei Zhao; Maria C N Marchetto; Fred H Gage
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.899

Review 10.  Multiple LINEs of retrotransposon silencing mechanisms in the mammalian germline.

Authors:  Fang Yang; P Jeremy Wang
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2016-03-05       Impact factor: 7.727

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.