Literature DB >> 21558518

A genomic predictor of response and survival following taxane-anthracycline chemotherapy for invasive breast cancer.

Christos Hatzis1, Lajos Pusztai, Vicente Valero, Daniel J Booser, Laura Esserman, Ana Lluch, Tatiana Vidaurre, Frankie Holmes, Eduardo Souchon, Hongkun Wang, Miguel Martin, José Cotrina, Henry Gomez, Rebekah Hubbard, J Ignacio Chacón, Jaime Ferrer-Lozano, Richard Dyer, Meredith Buxton, Yun Gong, Yun Wu, Nuhad Ibrahim, Eleni Andreopoulou, Naoto T Ueno, Kelly Hunt, Wei Yang, Arlene Nazario, Angela DeMichele, Joyce O'Shaughnessy, Gabriel N Hortobagyi, W Fraser Symmans.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Prediction of high probability of survival from standard cancer treatments is fundamental for individualized cancer treatment strategies.
OBJECTIVE: To develop a predictor of response and survival from chemotherapy for newly diagnosed invasive breast cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Prospective multicenter study conducted from June 2000 to March 2010 at the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center to develop and test genomic predictors for neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients were those with newly diagnosed ERBB2 (HER2 or HER2/neu)-negative breast cancer treated with chemotherapy containing sequential taxane and anthracycline-based regimens (then endocrine therapy if estrogen receptor [ER]-positive). Different predictive signatures for resistance and response to preoperative (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy (stratified according to ER status) were developed from gene expression microarrays of newly diagnosed breast cancer (310 patients). Breast cancer treatment sensitivity was then predicted using the combination of signatures for (1) sensitivity to endocrine therapy, (2) chemoresistance, and (3) chemosensitivity, with independent validation (198 patients) and comparison with other reported genomic predictors of chemotherapy response. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Distant relapse-free survival (DRFS) if predicted treatment sensitive and absolute risk reduction ([ARR], difference in DRFS between 2 predicted groups) at median follow-up (3 years).
RESULTS: Patients in the independent validation cohort (99% clinical stage II-III) who were predicted to be treatment sensitive (28%) had 56% (95% CI, 31%-78%) probability of excellent pathologic response and DRFS of 92% (95% CI, 85%-100%), with an ARR of 18% (95% CI, 6%-28%). Survival was predicted in ER-positive (30% predicted sensitive; DRFS, 97% [95% CI, 91%-100%]; ARR, 11% [95% CI, 0.1%-21%]) and ER-negative (26% predicted sensitive; DRFS, 83% [95% CI, 68%-100%]; ARR, 26% [95% CI, 4%-48%]) subsets and was significant in multivariate analysis. Other genomic predictors showed paradoxically worse survival for patients predicted to be responsive to chemotherapy.
CONCLUSION: A genomic predictor combining ER status, predicted chemoresistance, predicted chemosensitivity, and predicted endocrine sensitivity identified patients with high probability of survival following taxane and anthracycline chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21558518      PMCID: PMC5638042          DOI: 10.1001/jama.2011.593

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  33 in total

1.  Strong time dependence of the 76-gene prognostic signature for node-negative breast cancer patients in the TRANSBIG multicenter independent validation series.

Authors:  Christine Desmedt; Fanny Piette; Sherene Loi; Yixin Wang; Françoise Lallemand; Benjamin Haibe-Kains; Giuseppe Viale; Mauro Delorenzi; Yi Zhang; Mahasti Saghatchian d'Assignies; Jonas Bergh; Rosette Lidereau; Paul Ellis; Adrian L Harris; Jan G M Klijn; John A Foekens; Fatima Cardoso; Martine J Piccart; Marc Buyse; Christos Sotiriou
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2007-06-01       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 2.  A pathologist's perspective on emerging genomic tests for breast cancer.

Authors:  W Fraser Symmans
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.929

3.  Sequential preoperative or postoperative docetaxel added to preoperative doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide for operable breast cancer:National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-27.

Authors:  Harry D Bear; Stewart Anderson; Roy E Smith; Charles E Geyer; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Bernard Fisher; Ann M Brown; Andre Robidoux; Richard Margolese; Morton S Kahlenberg; Soonmyung Paik; Atilla Soran; D Lawrence Wickerham; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-04-10       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer.

Authors:  Antonio C Wolff; M Elizabeth H Hammond; Jared N Schwartz; Karen L Hagerty; D Craig Allred; Richard J Cote; Mitchell Dowsett; Patrick L Fitzgibbons; Wedad M Hanna; Amy Langer; Lisa M McShane; Soonmyung Paik; Mark D Pegram; Edith A Perez; Michael F Press; Anthony Rhodes; Catharine Sturgeon; Sheila E Taube; Raymond Tubbs; Gail H Vance; Marc van de Vijver; Thomas M Wheeler; Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-12-11       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Preoperative chemotherapy in patients with operable breast cancer: nine-year results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-18.

Authors:  N Wolmark; J Wang; E Mamounas; J Bryant; B Fisher
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2001

6.  The 70-gene signature as a response predictor for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  Marieke E Straver; Annuska M Glas; Juliane Hannemann; Jelle Wesseling; Marc J van de Vijver; Emiel J Th Rutgers; Marie-Jeanne T F D Vrancken Peeters; Harm van Tinteren; Laura J Van't Veer; Sjoerd Rodenhuis
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Univariate shrinkage in the cox model for high dimensional data.

Authors:  Robert J Tibshirani
Journal:  Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2009-04-14

8.  Measurement of residual breast cancer burden to predict survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  W Fraser Symmans; Florentia Peintinger; Christos Hatzis; Radhika Rajan; Henry Kuerer; Vicente Valero; Lina Assad; Anna Poniecka; Bryan Hennessy; Marjorie Green; Aman U Buzdar; S Eva Singletary; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Lajos Pusztai
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-09-04       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Supervised risk predictor of breast cancer based on intrinsic subtypes.

Authors:  Joel S Parker; Michael Mullins; Maggie C U Cheang; Samuel Leung; David Voduc; Tammi Vickery; Sherri Davies; Christiane Fauron; Xiaping He; Zhiyuan Hu; John F Quackenbush; Inge J Stijleman; Juan Palazzo; J S Marron; Andrew B Nobel; Elaine Mardis; Torsten O Nielsen; Matthew J Ellis; Charles M Perou; Philip S Bernard
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-02-09       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  An integrated approach to the prediction of chemotherapeutic response in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Kelly H Salter; Chaitanya R Acharya; Kelli S Walters; Richard Redman; Ariel Anguiano; Katherine S Garman; Carey K Anders; Sayan Mukherjee; Holly K Dressman; William T Barry; Kelly P Marcom; John Olson; Joseph R Nevins; Anil Potti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  292 in total

1.  Pathologic complete response predicts recurrence-free survival more effectively by cancer subset: results from the I-SPY 1 TRIAL--CALGB 150007/150012, ACRIN 6657.

Authors:  Laura J Esserman; Donald A Berry; Angela DeMichele; Lisa Carey; Sarah E Davis; Meredith Buxton; Cliff Hudis; Joe W Gray; Charles Perou; Christina Yau; Chad Livasy; Helen Krontiras; Leslie Montgomery; Debasish Tripathy; Constance Lehman; Minetta C Liu; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Hope S Rugo; John T Carpenter; Lynn Dressler; David Chhieng; Baljit Singh; Carolyn Mies; Joseph Rabban; Yunn-Yi Chen; Dilip Giri; Laura van 't Veer; Nola Hylton
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Metabolic enzymes expressed by cancer cells impact the immune infiltrate.

Authors:  Gautier Stoll; Margerie Kremer; Normal Bloy; Adrien Joseph; Maria Castedo; Guillaume Meurice; Christophe Klein; Lorenzo Galluzzi; Judith Michels; Guido Kroemer
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2019-03-30       Impact factor: 8.110

3.  Quantitative assessment Ki-67 score for prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  Jason R Brown; Michael P DiGiovanna; Brigid Killelea; Donald R Lannin; David L Rimm
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 5.662

4.  Radiation-induced gene signature predicts pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Daniel S Oh; Maggie C U Cheang; Cheng Fan; Charles M Perou
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 2.841

5.  Disparity in Tumor Immune Microenvironment of Breast Cancer and Prognostic Impact: Asian Versus Western Populations.

Authors:  Ching-Hsuan Chen; Yen-Shen Lu; Ann-Lii Cheng; Chiun-Sheng Huang; Wen-Hung Kuo; Ming-Yang Wang; Ming Chao; I-Chun Chen; Chun-Wei Kuo; Tzu-Pin Lu; Ching-Hung Lin
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-08-01

6.  Testing violations of the exponential assumption in cancer clinical trials with survival endpoints.

Authors:  Gang Han; Michael J Schell; Heping Zhang; Daniel Zelterman; Lajos Pusztai; Kerin Adelson; Christos Hatzis
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Dual functions of the homeoprotein DLX4 in modulating responsiveness of tumor cells to topoisomerase II-targeting drugs.

Authors:  Bon Q Trinh; Song Yi Ko; Nicolas Barengo; Shiaw-Yih Lin; Honami Naora
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Obesity and overfeeding affecting both tumor and systemic metabolism activates the progesterone receptor to contribute to postmenopausal breast cancer.

Authors:  Erin D Giles; Elizabeth A Wellberg; David P Astling; Steven M Anderson; Ann D Thor; Sonali Jindal; Aik-Choon Tan; Pepper S Schedin; Paul S Maclean
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Prognostic microRNA/mRNA signature from the integrated analysis of patients with invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Stefano Volinia; Carlo M Croce
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  TP53 mutation-correlated genes predict the risk of tumor relapse and identify MPS1 as a potential therapeutic kinase in TP53-mutated breast cancers.

Authors:  Balázs Győrffy; Giulia Bottai; Jacqueline Lehmann-Che; György Kéri; László Orfi; Takayuki Iwamoto; Christine Desmedt; Giampaolo Bianchini; Nicholas C Turner; Hugues de Thè; Fabrice André; Christos Sotiriou; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Angelo Di Leo; Lajos Pusztai; Libero Santarpia
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2014-01-05       Impact factor: 6.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.