Literature DB >> 11482295

Effects of a computerized treatment simulation on patient expectations for orthognathic surgery.

C Phillips1, L Bailey, H A Kiyak, D Bloomquist.   

Abstract

One hundred forty-six patients, ranging in age from 15 to 50 and presenting with a moderate to severe dentofacial disharmony requiring orthodontics and orthognathic surgery, were randomly assigned to 2 preparation strategy groups: standard presurgical consultation with or without a computerized treatment simulation presentation. The demographic profiles of the 2 groups were similar. Viewing a treatment simulation did not have a significant effect on the anticipation of social/interpersonal or general health problems in the first month after surgery. These 2 areas of concern were significantly related to psychological well-being. Psychologically distressed patients, whether or not they saw a simulation, expected significantly more problems in social/interpersonal relations and in general health during the first month after surgery. A treatment simulation presentation did affect patients' overall expectations of problems in the first month after surgery and their concerns about symptom recovery. However, the impact of the presentation was related to the patient's psychological well-being. In the standard presurgical consultation group, the average anticipated level of overall problems and discomfort during recovery was significantly higher for patients who reported elevated psychological distress than for those who did not. In the treatment simulation group, the average level of concern was similar for those patients who reported distress and those who did not. Preparation strategy was not significantly related to the long-term expectation of improvement after treatment. Long-term expectation of treatment improvement was related to psychological distress and gender. Men tended to report similar expectations regardless of psychological well-being, while women who were distressed anticipated significantly more improvement overall, in self-image, and in general health after treatment than women who were not distressed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11482295      PMCID: PMC3652672     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg        ISSN: 0742-1931


  25 in total

Review 1.  Patients' expectations for medical care: an expanded formulation based on review of the literature.

Authors:  R L Kravitz
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.929

2.  Psychosocial predictors of satisfaction among orthognathic surgery patients.

Authors:  A A Scott; J P Hatch; J D Rugh; T J Hoffman; S M Rivera; C Dolce; R A Bays
Journal:  Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg       Date:  2000

3.  The effect of videotape feedback on the self-assessments of psychiatric patients.

Authors:  R D Griffiths; J Hinkson
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  1973-08       Impact factor: 9.319

4.  How many stratification factors are "too many" to use in a randomization plan?

Authors:  T M Therneau
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1993-04

5.  The influence of videotape feedback on the self-assessments of psychiatric patients.

Authors:  R D Griffiths; P Gillingham
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 9.319

6.  Dentofacial disharmony: psychological status of patients seeking treatment consultation.

Authors:  C Phillips; M E Bennett; H L Broder
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Treatment expectations versus outcomes among orthognathic surgery patients.

Authors:  S Ostler; H A Kiyak
Journal:  Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg       Date:  1991

8.  Video-feedback and personal attribution in anorexic, depressed and normal viewers.

Authors:  S J Biggs; B Rosen; A B Summerfield
Journal:  Br J Med Psychol       Date:  1980-09

9.  Effects of psychophysical stress on surgical outcome.

Authors:  B S Linn; M W Linn; N G Klimas
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  1988 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.312

10.  Communication in orthodontic treatment planning: bioethical and informed consent issues.

Authors:  J L Ackerman; W R Proffit
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.079

View more
  6 in total

1.  Sensory retraining: burden in daily life related to altered sensation after orthognathic surgery, a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  C Phillips; S H Kim; M Tucker; T A Turvey
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.826

2.  Perceptions of recovery and satisfaction in the short term after orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  Ceib Phillips; H Asuman Kiyak; Dale Bloomquist; Timothy A Turvey
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.895

3.  The association between the psychological status and the severity of facial deformity in orthognathic patients.

Authors:  Aleksandra Kovalenko; Anna Slabkovskaya; Nailya Drobysheva; Leonid Persin; Alexey Drobyshev; Marcello Maddalone
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Agreement of young adults and orthodontists on dental aesthetics & influencing factors of self-perceived aesthetics.

Authors:  Ying Cai; Wulong Du; Feiou Lin; Shengjia Ye; Yanling Ye
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 2.757

5.  Accuracy of three-dimensional virtual simulation of the soft tissues of the face in OrtogOnBlender for correction of class II dentofacial deformities: an uncontrolled experimental case-series study.

Authors:  Hugo Santos Cunha; Cícero André da Costa Moraes; Rodrigo de Faria Valle Dornelles; Everton Luis Santos da Rosa
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2020-11-08

6.  Accuracy of Dolphin visual treatment objective (VTO) prediction software on class III patients treated with maxillary advancement and mandibular setback.

Authors:  Robert J Peterman; Shuying Jiang; Rene Johe; Padma M Mukherjee
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 2.750

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.