OBJECTIVES: To assess the use of percutaneous tracheostomy in Intensive Care Units (ICU) in Spain, its practice, and current opinions on the technique. DESIGN AND SETTING: An e-mail or post survey was sent to 239 Spanish ICU directors. Pediatric ICUs and coronary units were excluded. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: One hundred ICUs (41.8%) replied. The 44% ( n=44) of the ICUs that answered belonged to university hospitals and 53% ( n=53) had postgraduate teaching. Eighty-two percent ( n=82) used percutaneous tracheostomy. Griggs' Guide Wire Dilating Forceps and Ciaglia Blue Rhino were the most frequent techniques employed. In 30.5% of ICUs ( n=25) endoscopic guidance was used, in 15.7% ( n= 13) it was routine. In 24.4% ( n=20) some kind of long-term follow-up was carried out, but only in 12.2% ( n=10) was follow-up done routinely. In 58.5% of ICUs ( n=48) in which percutaneous tracheostomy is performed is this technique considered safer than surgical tracheostomy and in 86.4% ( n=70) percutaneous tracheostomy is the first choice for tracheostomy in the critically ill patient. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous tracheostomy is a well-established technique in ICUs in Spain, and is considered the technique of choice for tracheostomy in critically ill patients. It is mainly performed without endoscopic guidance and follow-up is not usually carried out.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the use of percutaneous tracheostomy in Intensive Care Units (ICU) in Spain, its practice, and current opinions on the technique. DESIGN AND SETTING: An e-mail or post survey was sent to 239 Spanish ICU directors. Pediatric ICUs and coronary units were excluded. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: One hundred ICUs (41.8%) replied. The 44% ( n=44) of the ICUs that answered belonged to university hospitals and 53% ( n=53) had postgraduate teaching. Eighty-two percent ( n=82) used percutaneous tracheostomy. Griggs' Guide Wire Dilating Forceps and Ciaglia Blue Rhino were the most frequent techniques employed. In 30.5% of ICUs ( n=25) endoscopic guidance was used, in 15.7% ( n= 13) it was routine. In 24.4% ( n=20) some kind of long-term follow-up was carried out, but only in 12.2% ( n=10) was follow-up done routinely. In 58.5% of ICUs ( n=48) in which percutaneous tracheostomy is performed is this technique considered safer than surgical tracheostomy and in 86.4% ( n=70) percutaneous tracheostomy is the first choice for tracheostomy in the critically illpatient. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous tracheostomy is a well-established technique in ICUs in Spain, and is considered the technique of choice for tracheostomy in critically illpatients. It is mainly performed without endoscopic guidance and follow-up is not usually carried out.
Authors: M K Walz; K Peitgen; N Thürauf; H A Trost; U Wolfhard; A Sander; C Ahmadi; F W Eigler Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 1998-07 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Ralph Dollner; Markus Verch; Peter Schweiger; Christina Deluigi; Bernhard Graf; Frank Wallner Journal: Chest Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Robert R Cima; John R Bergquist; Kristine T Hanson; Cornelius A Thiels; Elizabeth B Habermann Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2017-05-03 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Rafael Fernandez; Nestor Bacelar; Gonzalo Hernandez; Isabel Tubau; Francisco Baigorri; Gisela Gili; Antonio Artigas Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2008-06-03 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Maria Vargas; Yuda Sutherasan; Massimo Antonelli; Iole Brunetti; Antonio Corcione; John G Laffey; Christian Putensen; Giuseppe Servillo; Paolo Pelosi Journal: Crit Care Date: 2015-08-13 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Mohammad Waheed El-Anwar; Ahmad Abdel-Fattah Nofal; Mohammad A El Shawadfy; Ahmed Maaty; Alaa Omar Khazbak Journal: Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2016-07-26
Authors: José M Añón; María Soledad Arellano; Manuel Pérez-Márquez; Claudia Díaz-Alvariño; José A Márquez-Alonso; Jorge Rodríguez-Peláez; Kapil Nanwani-Nanwani; Ana Martín-Pellicer; Belén Civantos; Alba López-Fernández; Irene Seises; Jorge García-Nerín; Juan C Figueira; Henar Casero; Javier Vejo; Alexander Agrifoglio; Lucía Cachafeiro; Mariana Díaz-Almirón; Jesús Villar Journal: Trials Date: 2021-06-29 Impact factor: 2.279