Literature DB >> 11083694

A meta-analysis of prospective trials comparing percutaneous and surgical tracheostomy in critically ill patients.

B D Freeman1, K Isabella, N Lin, T G Buchman.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVES: Tracheostomy is one of the most commonly performed procedures in the patient receiving long-term mechanical ventilation. While percutaneous dilational tracheostomy (PDT) is becoming increasingly utilized as an alternative to conventional surgical tracheostomy, most literature evaluating these two techniques is neither prospective nor controlled. We performed a meta-analysis of available prospective controlled studies comparing PDT and surgical tracheostomy in critically ill patients to more fully understand the relative benefits and risks of these two procedures in this population.
DESIGN: Meta-analysis using Mantel-Haenszel fixed effect model.
INTERVENTIONS: We performed searches of MEDLINE, Current Contents, Best Evidence, Cochrane, and HealthSTAR databases from 1985 to present to identify prospective controlled studies comparing PDT and surgical tracheostomy in critically ill patients. After establishing clinical and statistical homogeneity (Q: statistic), studies were analyzed by a Mantel-Haenszel fixed effect model. For each clinical end point examined, PDT and surgical tracheostomy were compared by calculating either absolute differences or odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for continuous or discrete variables, respectively. MEASUREMENTS AND
RESULTS: We pooled data from five studies (236 patients) satisfying our search criteria to analyze eight clinical end points. Operative time was shorter for PDT than surgical tracheostomy: absolute difference with 95% CI, 9. 84 min (7.83 to 10.85 min). There was no difference comparing PDT and surgical tracheostomy with respect to overall operative complication rates: OR with 95% CI, 0.732 (0.05 to 9.37). However, relative to surgical tracheostomy, PDT was associated with less perioperative bleeding (OR with 95% CI, 0.14 [0.02 to 0.39]), a lower overall postoperative complication rate (OR with 95% CI, 0.14 [0.07 to 0.29]), as well as a lower postoperative incidence of bleeding (OR with 95% CI, 0.39 [0.17 to 0.88]), and stomal infection (OR with 95% CI, 0.02 [0.01 to 0.07]). No difference was identified in days intubated prior to tracheostomy (absolute difference with 95% CI, 0.16 days [- 0.9 to 1.22 days]), overall procedure-related complications (OR with 95% CI, 0.73 [0.06 to 9.37]), or death (OR with 95% CI, 0.63 [0.18 to 2.20]) comparing these two techniques.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite its popularity, there are currently only a limited number of small studies prospectively evaluating PDT and surgical tracheostomy. Our meta-analysis of these studies suggests potential advantages of PDT relative to surgical tracheostomy, including ease of performance, and lower incidence of peristomal bleeding and postoperative infection. If confirmed by additional, adequately powered prospective trials, these findings support PDT as the procedure of choice for the establishment of elective tracheostomy in the appropriately selected critically ill patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11083694     DOI: 10.1378/chest.118.5.1412

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  78 in total

1.  Comparing percutaneous tracheostomy with open surgical tracheostomy.

Authors:  Irawan Susanto
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-01-05

2.  Tracheostomy for long-term ventilated patients: a postal survey of ICU practice in The Netherlands.

Authors:  Bernard G Fikkers; Gerdine A J Fransen; Johannes G van der Hoeven; Inge S Briedé; Frank J A van den Hoogen
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-07-22       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Who is performing percutaneous tracheotomies? Practice patterns of surgeons in the USA.

Authors:  Elizabeth Newhouse; Michael P Ondik; Michele Carr; David Goldenberg
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 4.  Surgical versus percutaneous tracheostomy: an evidence-based approach.

Authors:  Sotirios Pappas; Pavlos Maragoudakis; Petros Vlastarakos; Dimitrios Assimakopoulos; Thomi Mandrali; Dimitrios Kandiloros; Thomas P Nikolopoulos
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 5.  Percutaneous techniques versus surgical techniques for tracheostomy.

Authors:  Patrick Brass; Martin Hellmich; Angelika Ladra; Jürgen Ladra; Anna Wrzosek
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-07-20

6.  [Tracheotomy and tracheostomy techniques].

Authors:  H Bartels
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 0.955

7.  Percutaneous dilational tracheostomy in neurosurgical patients.

Authors:  Samuel R Browd; Joel D MacDonald
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.210

8.  Effect of percutaneous tracheostomy on intracerebral pressure and perfusion pressure in patients with acute cerebral dysfunction (TIP Trial): an observational study.

Authors:  Jens Kleffmann; Roman Pahl; Wolfgang Deinsberger; Andreas Ferbert; Christian Roth
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.210

9.  Safety and feasibility of percutaneous tracheostomy performed by neurointensivists.

Authors:  David B Seder; Kiwon Lee; Celine Rahman; Nirmala Rossan-Raghunath; Luis Fernandez; Fred Rincon; Jan Claassen; Errol Gordon; Stephan A Mayer; Neeraj Badjatia
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 10.  Percutaneous tracheostomy: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Ashraf O Rashid; Shaheen Islam
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.895

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.