R C Leonard1, R H Lewis, B Singh, P V van Heerden. 1. Department of Intensive Care, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia. richard_leonard@yahoo.com
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess late outcome following percutaneous tracheostomy using the Portex kit (Hythe, Kent, UK). DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study. SETTING: Teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Forty-nine consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous tracheostomy in the ICU using the Portex kit and who survived 6 months after the procedure. INTERVENTIONS: Questionnaires regarding six symptoms were sent to all 49 surviving patients; the 39 respondents were invited to attend for review. Thirteen patients underwent pulmonary function testing, of whom 10 also underwent fiberoptic laryngotracheoscopy under local anesthesia. RESULTS: The most common symptom was a minor change in voice. One patient had required treatment for symptomatic tracheal stenosis by the time of review; one was referred for revision of a tethered scar. Pulmonary function testing was easily performed by all patients and revealed no evidence of upper airway obstruction. Tracheoscopy likewise showed no evidence of tracheal stenosis. CONCLUSIONS: One of 49 patients had developed tracheal stenosis. None of the patients attending for detailed review showed any sign of late complications other than one tethered scar.
OBJECTIVE: To assess late outcome following percutaneous tracheostomy using the Portex kit (Hythe, Kent, UK). DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study. SETTING: Teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Forty-nine consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous tracheostomy in the ICU using the Portex kit and who survived 6 months after the procedure. INTERVENTIONS: Questionnaires regarding six symptoms were sent to all 49 surviving patients; the 39 respondents were invited to attend for review. Thirteen patients underwent pulmonary function testing, of whom 10 also underwent fiberoptic laryngotracheoscopy under local anesthesia. RESULTS: The most common symptom was a minor change in voice. One patient had required treatment for symptomatic tracheal stenosis by the time of review; one was referred for revision of a tethered scar. Pulmonary function testing was easily performed by all patients and revealed no evidence of upper airway obstruction. Tracheoscopy likewise showed no evidence of tracheal stenosis. CONCLUSIONS: One of 49 patients had developed tracheal stenosis. None of the patients attending for detailed review showed any sign of late complications other than one tethered scar.
Authors: José M Añón; Maria Paz Escuela; Vicente Gómez; Abelardo García de Lorenzo; Juan C Montejo; Jorge López Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2004-04-30 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Bernard G Fikkers; Marieke Staatsen; Sabine G G F Lardenoije; Frank J A van den Hoogen; Johannes G van der Hoeven Journal: Crit Care Date: 2004-07-05 Impact factor: 9.097