Literature DB >> 15117997

Individuals with an increased risk of colorectal cancer: perceived benefits and psychological aspects of surveillance by means of regular colonoscopies.

A Liljegren1, G Lindgren, Y Brandberg, S Rotstein, B Nilsson, T Hatschek, E Jaramillo, A Lindblom.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the psychological consequences of genetic counseling followed by a surveillance program using colonoscopy among individuals with increased risk of colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred sixty-five individuals, participating in a surveillance program with colonoscopy, were mailed a survey questionnaire that assessed their experience of the surveillance program and their perception of the risk of colorectal cancer. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale and the Swedish Short Form-36 Health Survey was also included.
RESULTS: Two hundred forty individuals completed the questionnaire and were divided into the following risk groups: risk group 1, an individual with a mutation in hMLH1 or hMSH2 and a lifetime colorectal cancer risk of 80% (n = 28); risk group 2, a lifetime colorectal cancer risk of 40% (n = 129); and risk group 3, a lifetime colorectal cancer risk of 20% (n = 83). Among all individuals, the mean for perceived benefit was 8.0, and the perception of discomfort was 3.3 on the visual analog scale (1-10). In risk group 1, 61% underestimated personal risks as being 40% or less. Approximately 50% of the subjects in risk groups 2 and 3 either under- or overestimated their lifetime risk. According to the Swedish Short Form-36 Health Survey and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale, the study sample resembled the reference population.
CONCLUSION: A majority of the study sample understood why they were under surveillance, and regular colonoscopies were well-tolerated. The wide range of risk perception as well as low-risk perception in mutation positive subjects is acceptable, as long as these individuals adhere to surveillance programs and do not demonstrate increased levels of anxiety or depression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15117997     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.04.138

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  14 in total

1.  A genome wide linkage analysis in Swedish families with hereditary non-familial adenomatous polyposis/non-hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer.

Authors:  T Djureinovic; J Skoglund; J Vandrovcova; X-L Zhou; A Kalushkova; L Iselius; A Lindblom
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-09-08       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 2.  Screening participation for people at increased risk of colorectal cancer due to family history: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Driss Ait Ouakrim; Trevor Lockett; Alex Boussioutas; John L Hopper; Mark A Jenkins
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  The added value of PMS2 immunostaining in the diagnosis of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Britta Halvarsson; Annika Lindblom; Eva Rambech; Kristina Lagerstedt; Mef Nilbert
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2006-07-12       Impact factor: 2.375

4.  Compliance and Satisfaction with Long-Term Surveillance in Finnish HNPCC Families.

Authors:  Kirsi Pylvänäinen; Matti Kairaluoma; Jukka-Pekka Mecklin
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.375

5.  A mobile colonoscopic unit for lynch syndrome: trends in surveillance uptake and patient experiences of screening in a developing country.

Authors:  Zandrè Bruwer; Merle Futter; Raj Ramesar
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  A telematic tool to predict the risk of colorectal cancer in white men and women: ColoRectal Cancer Alert (CRCA).

Authors:  Isabel de la Torre; Francisco Javier Díaz; Míriam Antón; Esteban Barragán; Joel Rodrigues; Celina Pires
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 4.460

7.  Perceived risk for cancer progression and psychological status in chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients: CALGB 70603 (Alliance).

Authors:  Teresa L Deshields; Amylou C Dueck; Kerry Rogers; Jennifer R Brown; Tait Shanafelt; David Mintzer; John C Byrd
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2019-03-27

8.  Improved health perception after genetic counselling for women at high risk of breast and/or ovarian cancer: construction of new questionnaires--an Italian exploratory study.

Authors:  Chiara Catania; Irene Feroce; Monica Barile; Aron Goldhirsch; Tommaso De Pas; Filippo de Braud; Sabrina Boselli; Laura Adamoli; Davide Radice; Alessandra Rossi; Gianluca Spitaleri; Cristina Noberasco; Bernardo Bonanni
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 4.553

9.  Risk perception after genetic counseling in patients with increased risk of cancer.

Authors:  Johanna Rantala; Ulla Platten; Gunilla Lindgren; Bo Nilsson; Brita Arver; Annika Lindblom; Yvonne Brandberg
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2009-08-23       Impact factor: 2.857

10.  Colorectal cancer in the family: psychosocial distress and social issues in the years following genetic counselling.

Authors:  Eveline M A Bleiker; Fred H Menko; Irma Kluijt; Babs G Taal; Miranda A Gerritsma; Lidwina D V Wever; Neil K Aaronson
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 2.857

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.