Literature DB >> 15117388

How is patient-centred care understood by the clinical, managerial and lay stakeholders responsible for promoting this agenda?

Rosemary Gillespie1, Dominique Florin, Steve Gillam.   

Abstract

AIMS AND
OBJECTIVES: This study explores how the term patient-centred care is understood, particularly by those who are involved in translating the concept from a theoretical idea into a practical application. It examines the ways in which intermediate level stakeholders such as health service managers, educationalists, professional leaders and officers of patient bodies understand and promote patient-centred care among health professionals actually delivering patient care.
DESIGN: Qualitative interview study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Interviewees were drawn from groups and organizations from four categories: health agencies and regulatory bodies, Royal Colleges and other professional bodies, educational institutions, patient and user groups and consumer organizations. MAIN VARIABLES STUDIED: The meanings and understandings of patient-centred care, commitment to implementing patient-centred care and barriers and opportunities to implementation. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSIONS: Patient-centred care covers a range of activities from patient involvement in individual care to public involvement in health policy decisions. Current Department of Health policy has made patient-centred care a priority, but has not clarified exactly what it means. Thus, health professionals, educationalists, managers and patient representatives have all developed different meanings of patient-centred care to reflect their own particular backgrounds and roles. The individual aspects of patient-centred care have been neglected in policy terms and important research findings have not been incorporated into policies to change the attitudes and behaviours of health professionals. Developing a shared understanding of patient-centred care which encompasses all its components is an important role for the new Commission for Patient and Public Involvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15117388      PMCID: PMC5060232          DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2004.00264.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Expect        ISSN: 1369-6513            Impact factor:   3.377


  3 in total

Review 1.  Partnerships with patients: the pros and cons of shared clinical decision-making.

Authors:  A Coulter
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  1997-04

2.  Shared decision-making in primary care: the neglected second half of the consultation.

Authors:  G Elwyn; A Edwards; P Kinnersley
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Towards a feasible model for shared decision making: focus group study with general practice registrars.

Authors:  G Elwyn; A Edwards; R Gwyn; R Grol
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-09-18
  3 in total
  22 in total

1.  Lessons from local engagement in Latin American health systems.

Authors:  Geoffrey D Meads; Frances E Griffiths; Sarah D Goode; Michiyo Iwami
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Bridging the divide between families and health professionals' perspectives on family-centred care.

Authors:  Gail L MacKean; Wilfreda E Thurston; Catherine M Scott
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 3.  Facilitators and barriers to implementing quality measurement in primary mental health care: Systematic review.

Authors:  Donald Addington; Tania Kyle; Soni Desai; JianLi Wang
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  International collaboration in primary care: a win-win situation.

Authors:  Teresa Pawlikowska; Hans Thulesius
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.581

5.  Doctors on status and respect: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Wendy Lipworth; Miles Little; Pippa Markham; Jill Gordon; Ian Kerridge
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 1.352

6.  Patients' views of teamwork in the emergency department offer insights about team performance.

Authors:  Beverly W Henry; Danielle M McCarthy; Anna P Nannicelli; Nicholas P Seivert; John A Vozenilek
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  Supporting a person-centred approach in clinical guidelines. A position paper of the Allied Health Community - Guidelines International Network (G-I-N).

Authors:  Simone A van Dulmen; Sue Lukersmith; Josephine Muxlow; Elaine Santa Mina; Maria W G Nijhuis-van der Sanden; Philip J van der Wees
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  Patient perspectives on interpersonal aspects of healthcare and patient-centeredness at primary health facilities: A mixed methods study in rural Eastern Uganda.

Authors:  Everlyn Waweru; Tom Smekens; Joanna Orne-Gliemann; Freddie Ssengooba; Jacqueline Broerse; Bart Criel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Considering patient non-participation in health care.

Authors:  Ann Catrine Eldh; Inger Ekman; Margareta Ehnfors
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  The politics of patient-centred care.

Authors:  Sara A Kreindler
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 3.377

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.