Literature DB >> 18816322

Considering patient non-participation in health care.

Ann Catrine Eldh1, Inger Ekman, Margareta Ehnfors.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to depict patient non-participation as described by a diverse group with recent experiences of being patients.
BACKGROUND: Patient participation is regarded as a primary condition for optimal quality of care, suggesting that non-participation should be avoided. A common understanding of the concept of patient non-participation is needed. A discrepancy in definitions of patient non-participation has been found in health-care interactions, health-care classifications and health-care research, and little is known of what patient non-participation represents to patients. STUDY
DESIGN: A survey consisting of closed-ended and open-ended questions was administered to persons that had recently been patients to gather respondents' descriptions of what they considered as patient non-participation. Qualitative content analysis was used to analyse free-text descriptions, and descriptive statistics were used for the close-ended alternatives.
FINDINGS: Lacking information (e.g. not being provided with appropriate information) and lacking recognition (e.g. not being listened to and/or lacking recognition as an individual with individual needs and concerns) were significant aspects of patient non-participation. Furthermore, non-participation encompassed facing organization-centred, as opposed to patient-centred, health care as well as feeling insecure in health care interactions.
CONCLUSION: The findings provide input for a better understanding of what patients experience as non-participation. Organising for the caregivers to be able to thoroughly listen to the patients' illness narratives would easily reduce the risk of patient's experiencing what is described as non-participation and would provide a sound base for patient learning needs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18816322      PMCID: PMC5060447          DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2008.00488.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Expect        ISSN: 1369-6513            Impact factor:   3.377


  23 in total

1.  The origins and consequences of patient autonomy: a 25-year retrospective.

Authors:  D J Rothman
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2001

2.  Content analysis: method, applications, and issues.

Authors:  B Downe-Wamboldt
Journal:  Health Care Women Int       Date:  1992 Jul-Sep

3.  Patient autonomy and the challenge of clinical uncertainty.

Authors:  Mark Parascandola; Jennifer Hawkins; Marion Danis
Journal:  Kennedy Inst Ethics J       Date:  2002-09

4.  Exploring symptoms in chronic heart failure.

Authors:  Inger Ekman; John G F Cleland; Bert Andersson; Karl Swedberg
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 15.534

Review 5.  Rigor or rigor mortis: the problem of rigor in qualitative research revisited.

Authors:  M Sandelowski
Journal:  ANS Adv Nurs Sci       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 1.824

6.  Conditions for patient participation and non-participation in health care.

Authors:  Ann Catrine Eldh; Inger Ekman; Margareta Ehnfors
Journal:  Nurs Ethics       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.874

7.  Patient participation in medical consultations: why some patients are more involved than others.

Authors:  Richard L Street; Howard S Gordon; Michael M Ward; Edward Krupat; Richard L Kravitz
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 8.  Patient empowerment: reflections on the challenge of fostering the adoption of a new paradigm.

Authors:  Robert M Anderson; Martha M Funnell
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2005-05

9.  Gender makes a difference in the description of dyspnoea in patients with chronic heart failure.

Authors:  Inger Ekman; Kurt Boman; Mona Olofsson; Nibia Aires; Karl Swedberg
Journal:  Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.908

10.  The meaning of patient participation for patients and nurses at a nurse-led clinic for chronic heart failure.

Authors:  Ann Catrine Eldh; Margareta Ehnfors; Inger Ekman
Journal:  Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs       Date:  2005-07-12       Impact factor: 3.908

View more
  8 in total

1.  Who makes the decision regarding the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer--the patient or physician?: results from a population-based study.

Authors:  Lixin Song; Ronald C Chen; Jeannette T Bensen; George J Knafl; Matthew E Nielsen; Laura Farnan; Eric M Wallen; Merle Mishel; Raj S Pruthi; James L Mohler; Paul A Godley
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Applicability of the Nutrition Risk Screening 2002 Combined with a Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment in Patients with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

Authors:  Xiaoxian Pan; Caihong Wang; Rong Li; Li Su; Mingwei Zhang; Chuanshu Cai; Shiping Liu; Weijian Zhang; Jihong Song; Jinsheng Hong
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 3.989

3.  The development and initial validation of a clinical tool for patients' preferences on patient participation--The 4Ps.

Authors:  Ann Catrine Eldh; Kristina Luhr; Margareta Ehnfors
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 4.  Care planning for long-term conditions – a concept mapping.

Authors:  Monique Lhussier; Simon Eaton; Natalie Forster; Mathew Thomas; Sue Roberts; Susan M Carr
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Patients' knowledge of and participation in preventing pressure ulcers- an intervention study.

Authors:  Lena N Schoeps; Anna-Britta Tallberg; Lena Gunningberg
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 3.315

6.  Performance of the measures of processes of care for adults and service providers in rehabilitation settings.

Authors:  Elena L Bamm; Peter Rosenbaum; Seanne Wilkins; Paul Stratford
Journal:  Patient Relat Outcome Meas       Date:  2015-06-08

7.  Lack of effective communication between communities and hospitals in Uganda: a qualitative exploration of missing links.

Authors:  Elizeus Rutebemberwa; Elizabeth Ekirapa-Kiracho; Olico Okui; Damien Walker; Aloysius Mutebi; George Pariyo
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Preference-based patient participation for most, if not all: A cross-sectional study of patient participation amongst persons with end-stage kidney disease.

Authors:  Caroline Martinsson; Fredrik Uhlin; Marika Wenemark; Ann Catrine Eldh
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 3.377

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.