G Cserni1. 1. Department of Pathology, Bács-Kiskun County Teaching Hospital, Hungary. cserni@freemail.hu
Abstract
AIMS: To create and use a geometrical model for sentinel lymph node (SLN) histopathology in breast cancer. METHODS: The model involves a spherical metastasis randomly situated in an SLN. Two extreme situations are taken as the starting points. In one of these, the metastasis is seen in its largest dimension, whereas in the other it is only just visible, approximating 0 mm in size. Intermediate positions are analysed, with different metastasis sizes and different distances between the levels assessed by histology. RESULTS: The findings suggest that sections taken 1 mm apart afford a reasonable means of identifying almost all metastases measuring > 2 mm (referred to as macrometastases here). For nearly all micrometastases to be identified correctly according to the current TNM definitions (that is, metastases > 0.2 mm), a step sectioning protocol with levels of 250 microm or 200 microm would be adequate. CONCLUSIONS: SLNs are the most likely sites of nodal metastasis. Macrometastases are of recognised prognostic relevance so that all should be identified, preferably correctly as macrometastases; an assessment of levels 1 mm apart appears satisfactory and sufficient for this aim. SLNs also offer an ideal method for the study of the significance of micrometastases; for this, step sections separated by 200 or 250 microm are a good choice.
AIMS: To create and use a geometrical model for sentinel lymph node (SLN) histopathology in breast cancer. METHODS: The model involves a spherical metastasis randomly situated in an SLN. Two extreme situations are taken as the starting points. In one of these, the metastasis is seen in its largest dimension, whereas in the other it is only just visible, approximating 0 mm in size. Intermediate positions are analysed, with different metastasis sizes and different distances between the levels assessed by histology. RESULTS: The findings suggest that sections taken 1 mm apart afford a reasonable means of identifying almost all metastases measuring > 2 mm (referred to as macrometastases here). For nearly all micrometastases to be identified correctly according to the current TNM definitions (that is, metastases > 0.2 mm), a step sectioning protocol with levels of 250 microm or 200 microm would be adequate. CONCLUSIONS: SLNs are the most likely sites of nodal metastasis. Macrometastases are of recognised prognostic relevance so that all should be identified, preferably correctly as macrometastases; an assessment of levels 1 mm apart appears satisfactory and sufficient for this aim. SLNs also offer an ideal method for the study of the significance of micrometastases; for this, step sections separated by 200 or 250 microm are a good choice.
Authors: B J Czerniecki; A M Scheff; L S Callans; F R Spitz; I Bedrosian; E F Conant; S G Orel; J Berlin; C Helsabeck; D L Fraker; C Reynolds Journal: Cancer Date: 1999-03-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: S Teng; E Dupont; C McCann; J Wang; M Bolano; K Durand; E Peltz; S S Bass; A Cantor; N N Ku; C E Cox Journal: Am Surg Date: 2000-06 Impact factor: 0.688
Authors: Karyn B Stitzenberg; Benjamin F Calvo; Mary V Iacocca; Brian H Neelon; Leah B Sansbury; Lynn G Dressler; David W Ollila Journal: Am J Clin Pathol Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 2.493
Authors: Yu Winston Wang; Nicholas P Reder; Soyoung Kang; Adam K Glaser; Qian Yang; Matthew A Wall; Sara H Javid; Suzanne M Dintzis; Jonathan T C Liu Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2017-06-14 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Eva V E Madsen; Jan van Dalen; Joost van Gorp; Inne H M Borel Rinkes; Thijs van Dalen Journal: Virchows Arch Date: 2008-06-18 Impact factor: 4.064
Authors: Donald L Weaver; Uyen Phuong Le; Stacey L Dupuis; Katherine A E Weaver; Seth P Harlow; Takamaru Ashikaga; David N Krag Journal: Am J Surg Pathol Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 6.394
Authors: Ghaleb Goussous; Sadaf Jafferbhoy; Niamh Smyth; Lisette Hammond; Sankaran Narayanan; Robert Mark Kirby; Soni Soumian Journal: Int J Breast Cancer Date: 2017-06-12
Authors: Lorenzo Daniele; Laura Annaratone; Elena Allia; Sara Mariani; Enrico Armando; Martino Bosco; Luigia Macrì; Paola Cassoni; Giuseppe D'Armento; Gianni Bussolati; Gabor Cserni; Anna Sapino Journal: J Cell Mol Med Date: 2008-07-30 Impact factor: 5.310
Authors: Han Wen; Alejandro Morales Martinez; Houxun Miao; Thomas C Larsen; Catherine P Nguyen; Eric E Bennett; Kellan P Moorse; Zu-Xi Yu; Alan T Remaley; Manfred Boehm; Ahmed M Gharib Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-07-20 Impact factor: 4.379