Literature DB >> 19730364

Metastasis detection in sentinel lymph nodes: comparison of a limited widely spaced (NSABP protocol B-32) and a comprehensive narrowly spaced paraffin block sectioning strategy.

Donald L Weaver1, Uyen Phuong Le, Stacey L Dupuis, Katherine A E Weaver, Seth P Harlow, Takamaru Ashikaga, David N Krag.   

Abstract

The National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-32 trial is examining whether patients with initially negative sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) who have occult metastases detected on deeper levels and cytokeratin immunohistochemistry stains are at risk for regional or distant metastases. The experimental B-32 protocol was designed to detect metastases larger than 1.0 mm by examining sections approximately 0.5 and 1.0 mm deeper into the paraffin blocks (2 levels; wide spacing). This pilot quality assurance study compares detection rates to a comprehensive protocol designed to detect metastases larger than 0.2 mm (multilevel; narrow spacing). All SLNs were sectioned grossly at close to 2.0 mm and all sections embedded in paraffin blocks. For clinical treatment, a single hematoxylin and eosin section was examined from each block. For 54 cases with 1 to 5 SLNs and all SLNs negative, additional cytokeratin immunohistochemistry sections were evaluated every 0.18 mm through the block until no tissue remained. Twenty of 176 (11.4%) blocks harbored occult metastases; the B-32 protocol detected metastases in 11 blocks (6.3%) and 9 additional blocks (5.1%) with metastases were detected on sections that would not have been evaluated (P=0.002; correlated proportions). Median number of levels examined per block on the comprehensive protocol was 11 (range: 3 to 26); the B-32 protocol was fixed at 2 levels (median 2; range: 1 to 2). Median thickness of node sections in the block was 2.1 mm (range: 0.7 to 4.8 mm) and the modal thickness was 2.3 mm. Although more comprehensive sectioning of SLNs detects additional micrometastases, the data suggest diminishing returns and reduced cost effectiveness for the comprehensive strategy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19730364      PMCID: PMC3008509          DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181b274e7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  14 in total

1.  Computer simulations of lymph node metastasis for optimizing the pathologic examination of sentinel lymph nodes in patients with breast carcinoma.

Authors:  G Farshid; M Pradhan; J Kollias; P G Gill
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  A model for determining the optimum histology of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer.

Authors:  G Cserni
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  NSABP-32: Phase III, randomized trial comparing axillary resection with sentinal lymph node dissection: a description of the trial.

Authors:  David N Krag; Thomas B Julian; Seth P Harlow; Donald L Weaver; Taka Ashikaga; John Bryant; Richard M Single; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Prerandomization Surgical Training for the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B-32 trial: a randomized phase III clinical trial to compare sentinel node resection to conventional axillary dissection in clinically node-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Seth P Harlow; David N Krag; Thomas B Julian; Takamaru Ashikaga; Donald L Weaver; Sheldon A Feldman; V Suzanne Klimberg; Roberto Kusminsky; Frederick L Moffat; R Dirk Noyes; Peter D Beitsch
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Pathologic findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project (Protocol No. 4). V. Significance of axillary nodal micro- and macrometastases.

Authors:  E R Fisher; A Palekar; H Rockette; C Redmond; B Fisher
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Significance of axillary macrometastases and micrometastases in mammary cancer.

Authors:  A G Huvos; R V Hutter; J W Berg
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1971-01       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 7.  Prognostic factors in breast cancer. College of American Pathologists Consensus Statement 1999.

Authors:  P L Fitzgibbons; D L Page; D Weaver; A D Thor; D C Allred; G M Clark; S G Ruby; F O'Malley; J F Simpson; J L Connolly; D F Hayes; S B Edge; A Lichter; S J Schnitt
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.534

8.  Discrepancies in current practice of pathological evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer. Results of a questionnaire based survey by the European Working Group for Breast Screening Pathology.

Authors:  G Cserni; I Amendoeira; N Apostolikas; J P Bellocq; S Bianchi; W Boecker; B Borisch; C E Connolly; T Decker; P Dervan; M Drijkoningen; I O Ellis; C W Elston; V Eusebi; D Faverly; P Heikkila; R Holland; H Kerner; J Kulka; J Jacquemier; M Lacerda; J Martinez-Penuela; C De Miguel; J L Peterse; F Rank; P Regitnig; A Reiner; A Sapino; B Sigal-Zafrani; A M Tanous; S Thorstenson; E Zozaya; G Fejes; C A Wells
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Sentinel lymph nodes and breast carcinoma: which micrometastases are clinically significant?

Authors:  Donald L Weaver
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 6.394

10.  The effect of tumor size and lymph node status on breast carcinoma lethality.

Authors:  James S Michaelson; Melvin Silverstein; Dennis Sgroi; Justin A Cheongsiatmoy; Alphonse Taghian; Simon Powell; Kevin Hughes; Arthur Comegno; Kenneth K Tanabe; Barbara Smith
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  Sentinel Lymph Nodes for Breast Carcinoma: A Paradigm Shift.

Authors:  Aoife Maguire; Edi Brogi
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 5.534

Review 2.  Locoregional treatment of early breast cancer with isolated tumor cells or micrometastases on sentinel lymph node biopsy.

Authors:  Agnès Tallet; Eric Lambaudie; Monique Cohen; Mathieu Minsat; Marie Bannier; Michel Resbeut; Gilles Houvenaeghel
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-04-10

3.  A phase 2 study of (99m)Tc-tilmanocept in the detection of sentinel lymph nodes in melanoma and breast cancer.

Authors:  Stanley P L Leong; Julian Kim; Merrick Ross; Mark Faries; Charles R Scoggins; Wendy L Rich Metz; Frederick O Cope; Richard C Orahood
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Effect of occult metastases on survival in node-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Donald L Weaver; Takamaru Ashikaga; David N Krag; Joan M Skelly; Stewart J Anderson; Seth P Harlow; Thomas B Julian; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Three-dimensional quantitative ultrasound for detecting lymph node metastases.

Authors:  Emi Saegusa-Beecroft; Junji Machi; Jonathan Mamou; Masaki Hata; Alain Coron; Eugene T Yanagihara; Tadashi Yamaguchi; Michael L Oelze; Pascal Laugier; Ernest J Feleppa
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 2.192

6.  Eight-year experience with the intraoperative frozen section examination of sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer in a North-Italian university center.

Authors:  Carla Cedolini; Serena Bertozzi; Luca Seriau; Ambrogio P Londero; Serena Concina; Federico Cattin; Onelio Geatti; Carla Di Loreto; Andrea Risaliti
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2013-12-15

Review 7.  Landmark trials affecting the surgical management of invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Dalliah M Black; Elizabeth A Mittendorf
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 2.741

Review 8.  Sentinel lymph nodes for breast carcinoma: an update on current practice.

Authors:  Aoife Maguire; Edi Brogi
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 5.087

9.  Clinical effect of the pathological axillary assessment method in breast cancer without clinical nodal metastasis.

Authors:  Shinsuke Sasada; Norio Masumoto; Akiko Emi; Takayuki Kadoya; Koji Arihiro; Morihito Okada
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 4.239

10.  X-ray microtomosynthesis of unstained pathology tissue samples.

Authors:  David T Nguyen; Thomas C Larsen; Muyang Wang; Russel H Knutsen; Zhihong Yang; Eric E Bennett; Dumitru Mazilu; Zu-Xi Yu; Xi Tao; Danielle R Donahue; Ahmed M Gharib; Christopher K E Bleck; Joel Moss; Alan T Remaley; Beth A Kozel; Han Wen
Journal:  J Microsc       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 1.758

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.