Literature DB >> 18958585

Diagnostic yield of touch imprint cytology of prostate core needle biopsies.

Sebastian Mannweiler1, Karl Pummer, Marco Auprich, Günter Galle, Gábor Méhes, Manfred Ratschek, Oleksiy Tsybrovskyy, Farid Moinfar.   

Abstract

Touch imprint cytology may provide additional information to core needle biopsy interpretation according to previous reports. The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic yield of this method in the diagnosis of prostate carcinoma. For this purpose, 452 transrectal prostate needle biopsies were evaluated from 56 patients. All patients were clinically suspicious of having prostate carcinoma. Two touch imprints were prepared from each fresh biopsy cylinder. Results of the standard histology and of the touch imprint evaluation were compared. Histologically negative biopsy cylinders were further evaluated for prostate carcinoma by fine step serial sectioning. The standard histological examination showed adenocarcinoma in 27 patients. Touch imprint cytology revealed atypical cells suspicious of carcinoma in 38 patients. This group included all 27 patients with positive standard histology and further 11 patients with initially negative core biopsy. Following serial sectioning, in three out of these 11 samples, histological evidence of a carcinoma could be proven. Fine step serial sectioning of all 29 core biopsies negative for carcinoma by standard histological examination, 26 patients remained negative. All three core biopsies initially negative by standard histology but positive after serial sectioning had cytology findings suspicious of carcinoma. We conclude, that in problematic cases the additional use of touch imprint cytology and serial sectioning of prostate core needle biopsies significantly improve the diagnostic accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18958585     DOI: 10.1007/s12253-008-9114-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res        ISSN: 1219-4956            Impact factor:   3.201


  16 in total

1.  Accuracy of touch imprint cytology of image-directed breast core needle biopsies.

Authors:  T W Jacobs; J F Silverman; B Schroeder; S Raza; J K Baum; S J Schnitt
Journal:  Acta Cytol       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.319

2.  Individual prostate biopsy core embedding facilitates maximal tissue representation.

Authors:  Jerry Kao; Melissa Upton; Ping Zhang; Seymour Rosen
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 3.  Pathological work-up of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer. Review of current data to be considered for the formulation of guidelines.

Authors:  G Cserni; I Amendoeira; N Apostolikas; J P Bellocq; S Bianchi; G Bussolati; W Boecker; B Borisch; C E Connolly; T Decker; P Dervan; M Drijkoningen; I O Ellis; C W Elston; V Eusebi; D Faverly; P Heikkila; R Holland; H Kerner; J Kulka; J Jacquemier; M Lacerda; J Martinez-Penuela; C De Miguel; J L Peterse; F Rank; P Regitnig; A Reiner; A Sapino; B Sigal-Zafrani; A M Tanous; S Thorstenson; E Zozaya; C A Wells
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 9.162

4.  Telomerase activity in touch-imprint cell preparations from fresh prostate needle biopsy specimens.

Authors:  P Chieco; A Bertaccini; C Giovannini; B A Stecca; G Martorana
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Prostatic biopsy. A morphologic correlation of aspiration cytology with needle biopsy histology.

Authors:  N A Epstein
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Pelvic lymph node metastases in prostatic carcinoma. The value of touch imprint cytology.

Authors:  J F Gentry
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 6.394

7.  Correlation of DNA ploidy and histologic diagnosis from prostate core-needle biopsies: is DNA ploidy more sensitive than histology for the diagnosis of carcinoma in small specimens?

Authors:  J Lo; B J Kerns; C L Amling; C N Robertson; L J Layfield
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.454

8.  Diagnostic dilemmas in detection of prostate cancer in patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound-guided needle biopsy of the prostate.

Authors:  G C Durkan; D R Greene
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.554

9.  Needle biopsies of the prostate: what constitutes adequate histologic sampling?

Authors:  R B Lane; C G Lane; K A Mangold; M H Johnson; W C Allsbrook
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 5.534

10.  Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate.

Authors:  K K Hodge; J E McNeal; M K Terris; T A Stamey
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  3 in total

1.  Touch imprint cytology of prostate core needle biopsy specimens: A useful method for immediate reporting of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Berna Aytac; Fatma Oz Atalay; Hakan Vuruskan; Gulaydan Filiz
Journal:  J Cytol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Impact of immediate evaluation of touch imprint cytology from computed tomography guided core needle biopsies of mass lesions: Single institution experience.

Authors:  Mana Moghadamfalahi; Mirna Podoll; Amy B Frey; Houda Alatassi
Journal:  Cytojournal       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 2.091

3.  Real-time diagnosis and Gleason grading of prostate core needle biopsies using nonlinear microscopy.

Authors:  James G Fujimoto; Yue Sun; Lucas C Cahill; Seymour Rosen; Tadayuki Yoshitake; Yubo Wu; Linda York; Leo L Tsai; Boris Gershman
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 8.209

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.