AIM: NAG6 gene is a novel tumor related gene identified recently. This study was designed to examine the expression of this gene in gastric cancer and corresponding normal tissues, and to investigate its role in the occurrence and development of gastric cancer, also to study if the genetic structure of NAG6 was altered in gastric cancer. METHODS: Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), Northern blot analysis and dot hybridization were used to compare the expression level of NAG6 gene in 42 cases of gastric cancer tissues with their corresponding normal tissues of the same patients respectively. In addition, restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis was adopted to study if the genetic structure of NAG6 was altered in gastric carcinomas. RESULTS: The expression of NAG6 in 57.1% gastric cancer tissues (25/42) was absent by RT-PCR analysis. The down-regulation rate of NAG6 in gastric cancer tissues was significantly higher than that in corresponding normal tissues (P<0.01). However no correlation between the down-regulation of NAG6 and lymph-node and/or distance metastasis was found in this study (P>0.05). Dot hybridization confirmed the results of RT-PCR. Furthermore, the results of EcoRI RFLP analysis of NAG6 gene demonstrated that 3 of 7 cases of gastric cancer showed loss of 5 kb fragment in comparison with their corresponding normal tissues. CONCLUSION: NAG6 gene is significantly down regulated in gastric cancer. The loss of genetic materials may be the cause of down-regulation of NAG6 expression. This seems to suggest that NAG6 may represent a candidate of putative tumor suppressor gene at 7q31-32 loci associated with gastric carcinoma. The down-regulation of this gene may play a role in occurrence and development of this disease, however it may not be associated with lymph node and/or distance metastasis.
AIM: NAG6 gene is a novel tumor related gene identified recently. This study was designed to examine the expression of this gene in gastric cancer and corresponding normal tissues, and to investigate its role in the occurrence and development of gastric cancer, also to study if the genetic structure of NAG6 was altered in gastric cancer. METHODS: Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), Northern blot analysis and dot hybridization were used to compare the expression level of NAG6 gene in 42 cases of gastric cancer tissues with their corresponding normal tissues of the same patients respectively. In addition, restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis was adopted to study if the genetic structure of NAG6 was altered in gastric carcinomas. RESULTS: The expression of NAG6 in 57.1% gastric cancer tissues (25/42) was absent by RT-PCR analysis. The down-regulation rate of NAG6 in gastric cancer tissues was significantly higher than that in corresponding normal tissues (P<0.01). However no correlation between the down-regulation of NAG6 and lymph-node and/or distance metastasis was found in this study (P>0.05). Dot hybridization confirmed the results of RT-PCR. Furthermore, the results of EcoRI RFLP analysis of NAG6 gene demonstrated that 3 of 7 cases of gastric cancer showed loss of 5 kb fragment in comparison with their corresponding normal tissues. CONCLUSION:NAG6 gene is significantly down regulated in gastric cancer. The loss of genetic materials may be the cause of down-regulation of NAG6 expression. This seems to suggest that NAG6 may represent a candidate of putative tumor suppressor gene at 7q31-32 loci associated with gastric carcinoma. The down-regulation of this gene may play a role in occurrence and development of this disease, however it may not be associated with lymph node and/or distance metastasis.
Authors: M Koike; S Takeuchi; J Yokota; S Park; Y Hatta; C W Miller; N Tsuruoka; H P Koeffler Journal: Genes Chromosomes Cancer Date: 1997-05 Impact factor: 5.006
Authors: M Maltoni; A Volpi; O Nanni; P Bajorko; E Belletti; A M Vecci; M Liverani; S Danesi; D Calistri; L Ricotti; D Amadori Journal: Forum (Genova) Date: 1998 Apr-Jun
Authors: A Gialluisi; D F Newbury; E G Wilcutt; R K Olson; J C DeFries; W M Brandler; B F Pennington; S D Smith; T S Scerri; N H Simpson; M Luciano; D M Evans; T C Bates; J F Stein; J B Talcott; A P Monaco; S Paracchini; C Francks; S E Fisher Journal: Genes Brain Behav Date: 2014-08-29 Impact factor: 3.449
Authors: Sheila Smiley; Philip E Nickerson; Lacrimioara Comanita; Narsis Daftarian; Ahmed El-Sehemy; En Leh Samuel Tsai; Stuart Matan-Lithwick; Keqin Yan; Sherry Thurig; Yacine Touahri; Rajiv Dixit; Tooka Aavani; Yves De Repentingy; Adam Baker; Catherine Tsilfidis; Jeff Biernaskie; Yves Sauvé; Carol Schuurmans; Rashmi Kothary; Alan J Mears; Valerie A Wallace Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2016-03-11 Impact factor: 4.379