Literature DB >> 15101409

The Prisoner's Dilemma and polymorphism in yeast SUC genes.

Duncan Greig1, Michael Travisano.   

Abstract

The SUC multigene family of the single-celled yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is polymorphic, with genes varying both in number and activity. All of the genes encode invertase, an enzyme that is secreted to digest sucrose outside of the cell. This communal endeavour creates the potential for individual cells to defect (cheat) by stealing the sugar digested by their neighbours without contributing the enzyme themselves. We measured the fitness of a defector, with a deleted suc2 gene, relative to an otherwise isogenic cooperator, with a functional SUC2 gene. We manipulated the level of social interaction within the community by varying the population density and found that the defector is less fit than the cooperator at low levels of sociality but more fit in dense communities. We propose that selection for antisocial cheating causes SUC polymorphism in nature. The infamous Prisoner's Dilemma game shows that social behaviour is generally unstable, and the success of both cooperation and defection can vary continuously in time and space. The variation in SUC genes reflects constant adaptation to an ever-changing biotic environment that is a consequence of the instability of cooperation. It is interesting that social interactions can have a direct effect on molecular evolution, even in an organism as simple as yeast.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15101409      PMCID: PMC1810003          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2003.0083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  10 in total

1.  'Raise the stakes' evolves into a defector.

Authors:  T Killingback; M Doebeli
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-08-05       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Development of cooperative relationships through increasing investment.

Authors:  G Roberts; T N Sherratt
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-07-09       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Oscillations in the evolution of reciprocity.

Authors:  M Nowak; K Sigmund
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1989-03-07       Impact factor: 2.691

Review 4.  The chromosome ends of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  E J Louis
Journal:  Yeast       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 3.239

Review 5.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae telomeres. A review.

Authors:  F E Pryde; E J Louis
Journal:  Biochemistry (Mosc)       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.487

6.  Incidence of SUC-RTM telomeric repeated genes in brewing and wild wine strains of Saccharomyces.

Authors:  M Denayrolles; E P de Villechenon; A Lonvaud-Funel; M Aigle
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.886

7.  Chaos and the evolution of cooperation.

Authors:  M Nowak; K Sigmund
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-06-01       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Adaptive evolution of highly mutable loci in pathogenic bacteria.

Authors:  E R Moxon; P B Rainey; M A Nowak; R E Lenski
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1994-01-01       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Organization of the SUC gene family in Saccharomyces.

Authors:  M Carlson; D Botstein
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  Polymeric SUC genes in natural populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  G I Naumov; E S Naumova; E D Sancho; M P Korhola
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  1996-01-01       Impact factor: 2.742

  10 in total
  104 in total

1.  Consequences of fluctuating group size for the evolution of cooperation.

Authors:  Ake Brännström; Thilo Gross; Bernd Blasius; Ulf Dieckmann
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 2.259

2.  Invasion and expansion of cooperators in lattice populations: prisoner's dilemma vs. snowdrift games.

Authors:  Feng Fu; Martin A Nowak; Christoph Hauert
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 2.691

3.  Cooperation, clumping and the evolution of multicellularity.

Authors:  Jay M Biernaskie; Stuart A West
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Privatization of cooperative benefits stabilizes mutualistic cross-feeding interactions in spatially structured environments.

Authors:  Samay Pande; Filip Kaftan; Stefan Lang; Aleš Svatoš; Sebastian Germerodt; Christian Kost
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 10.302

5.  Reduced fecundity is the cost of cheating in RNA virus phi6.

Authors:  John J Dennehy; Paul E Turner
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Synergy and discounting of cooperation in social dilemmas.

Authors:  Christoph Hauert; Franziska Michor; Martin A Nowak; Michael Doebeli
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 2.691

7.  Evolutionary games and population dynamics: maintenance of cooperation in public goods games.

Authors:  Christoph Hauert; Miranda Holmes; Michael Doebeli
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 8.  Engineering microbial systems to explore ecological and evolutionary dynamics.

Authors:  Yu Tanouchi; Robert P Smith; Lingchong You
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2012-02-04       Impact factor: 9.740

9.  Public goods dilemma in asexual ant societies.

Authors:  Shigeto Dobata; Kazuki Tsuji
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Bacterial Quorum Sensing Stabilizes Cooperation by Optimizing Growth Strategies.

Authors:  Eric L Bruger; Christopher M Waters
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.