Literature DB >> 15539353

Reduced fecundity is the cost of cheating in RNA virus phi6.

John J Dennehy1, Paul E Turner.   

Abstract

Co-infection by multiple viruses affords opportunities for the evolution of cheating strategies to use intracellular resources. Cheating may be costly, however, when viruses infect cells alone. We previously allowed the RNA bacteriophage phi6 to evolve for 250 generations in replicated environments allowing co-infection of Pseudomonas phaseolicola bacteria. Derived genotypes showed great capacity to compete during co-infection, but suffered reduced performance in solo infections. Thus, the evolved viruses appear to be cheaters that sacrifice between-host fitness for within-host fitness. It is unknown, however, which stage of the lytic growth cycle is linked to the cost of cheating. Here, we examine the cost through burst assays, where lytic infection can be separated into three discrete phases (analogous to phage life history): dispersal stage, latent period (juvenile stage), and burst (adult stage). We compared growth of a representative cheater and its ancestor in environments where the cost occurs. The cost of cheating was shown to be reduced fecundity, because cheaters feature a significantly smaller burst size (progeny produced per infected cell) when infecting on their own. Interestingly, latent period (average burst time) of the evolved virus was much longer than that of the ancestor, indicating the cost does not follow a life history trade-off between timing of reproduction and lifetime fecundity. Our data suggest that interference competition allows high fitness of derived cheaters in mixed infections, and we discuss preferential encapsidation as one possible mechanism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15539353      PMCID: PMC1691856          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2833

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  38 in total

1.  Searching for the advantages of virus sex.

Authors:  Paul E Turner
Journal:  Orig Life Evol Biosph       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.950

2.  Co-infection weakens selection against epistatic mutations in RNA viruses.

Authors:  Rémy Froissart; Claus O Wilke; Rebecca Montville; Susanna K Remold; Lin Chao; Paul E Turner
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  Models of parasite virulence.

Authors:  S A Frank
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.875

4.  Host density and the evolution of parasite virulence.

Authors:  H Knolle
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1989-01-23       Impact factor: 2.691

5.  Multiple mechanisms for the inhibition of entry and uncoating of superinfecting Semliki Forest virus.

Authors:  I R Singh; M Suomalainen; S Varadarajan; H Garoff; A Helenius
Journal:  Virology       Date:  1997-04-28       Impact factor: 3.616

6.  A game-theoretical model of parasite virulence.

Authors:  H J Bremermann; J Pickering
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1983-02-07       Impact factor: 2.691

Review 7.  Kin selection and parasite evolution: higher and lower virulence with hard and soft selection.

Authors:  L Chao; K A Hanley; C L Burch; C Dahlberg; P E Turner
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.875

8.  Defective interfering RNAs of a satellite virus.

Authors:  W Qiu; K B Scholthof
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.103

9.  Isolation of nonsense suppressor mutants in Pseudomonas.

Authors:  L Mindich; J Cohen; M Weisburd
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1976-04       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  The Prisoner's Dilemma and polymorphism in yeast SUC genes.

Authors:  Duncan Greig; Michael Travisano
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  11 in total

1.  Effects of sequential and simultaneous applications of bacteriophages on populations of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in vitro and in wax moth larvae.

Authors:  Alex R Hall; Daniel De Vos; Ville-Petri Friman; Jean-Paul Pirnay; Angus Buckling
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Evolution of DNA double-strand break repair by gene conversion: coevolution between a phage and a restriction-modification system.

Authors:  Koji Yahara; Ryota Horie; Ichizo Kobayashi; Akira Sasaki
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Bacteriophage migration via nematode vectors: host-parasite-consumer interactions in laboratory microcosms.

Authors:  John J Dennehy; Nicholas A Friedenberg; Yul W Yang; Paul E Turner
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Complementation and epistasis in viral coinfection dynamics.

Authors:  Hong Gao; Marcus W Feldman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  On the possible role of robustness in the evolution of infectious diseases.

Authors:  C Brandon Ogbunugafor; James B Pease; Paul E Turner
Journal:  Chaos       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.642

6.  What Can Phages Tell Us about Host-Pathogen Coevolution?

Authors:  John J Dennehy
Journal:  Int J Evol Biol       Date:  2012-11-18

7.  Robustness promotes evolvability of thermotolerance in an RNA virus.

Authors:  Robert C McBride; C Brandon Ogbunugafor; Paul E Turner
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2008-08-11       Impact factor: 3.260

Review 8.  Exploiting Genetic Interference for Antiviral Therapy.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Tanner; Karla A Kirkegaard; Leor S Weinberger
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  Competition between social cheater viruses is driven by mechanistically different cheating strategies.

Authors:  Moran Meir; Noam Harel; Danielle Miller; Maoz Gelbart; Avigdor Eldar; Uri Gophna; Adi Stern
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2020-08-21       Impact factor: 14.136

Review 10.  More than Simple Parasites: the Sociobiology of Bacteriophages and Their Bacterial Hosts.

Authors:  Patrick R Secor; Ajai A Dandekar
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 7.867

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.