Literature DB >> 12930763

Combining gene expression and molecular marker information for mapping complex trait genes: a simulation study.

Miguel Pérez-Enciso1, Miguel A Toro, Michel Tenenhaus, Daniel Gianola.   

Abstract

A method for mapping complex trait genes using cDNA microarray and molecular marker data jointly is presented and illustrated via simulation. We introduce a novel approach for simulating phenotypes and genotypes conditionally on real, publicly available, microarray data. The model assumes an underlying continuous latent variable (liability) related to some measured cDNA expression levels. Partial least-squares logistic regression is used to estimate the liability under several scenarios where the level of gene interaction, the gene effect, and the number of cDNA levels affecting liability are varied. The results suggest that: (1) the usefulness of microarray data for gene mapping increases when both the number of cDNA levels in the underlying liability and the QTL effect decrease and when genes are coexpressed; (2) the correlation between estimated and true liability is large, at least under our simulation settings; (3) it is unlikely that cDNA clones identified as significant with partial least squares (or with some other technique) are the true responsible cDNAs, especially as the number of clones in the liability increases; (4) the number of putatively significant cDNA levels increases critically if cDNAs are coexpressed in a cluster (however, the proportion of true causal cDNAs within the significant ones is similar to that in a no-coexpression scenario); and (5) data reduction is needed to smooth out the variability encountered in expression levels when these are analyzed individually.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12930763      PMCID: PMC1462653     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  21 in total

Review 1.  Linkage disequilibrium: what history has to tell us.

Authors:  Magnus Nordborg; Simon Tavaré
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 11.639

2.  Genetical genomics: the added value from segregation.

Authors:  R C Jansen; J P Nap
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 11.639

3.  Semiparametric maximum likelihood for nonlinear regression with measurement errors.

Authors:  Eun-Young Suh; Daniel W Schafer
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Combining mouse congenic strains and microarray gene expression analyses to study a complex trait: the NOD model of type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Iain A Eaves; Linda S Wicker; Ghassan Ghandour; Paul A Lyons; Laurence B Peterson; John A Todd; Richard J Glynne
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications.

Authors:  T Sørlie; C M Perou; R Tibshirani; T Aas; S Geisler; H Johnsen; T Hastie; M B Eisen; M van de Rijn; S S Jeffrey; T Thorsen; H Quist; J C Matese; P O Brown; D Botstein; P E Lønning; A L Børresen-Dale
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-09-11       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Predicting the clinical status of human breast cancer by using gene expression profiles.

Authors:  M West; C Blanchette; H Dressman; E Huang; S Ishida; R Spang; H Zuzan; J A Olson; J R Marks; J R Nevins
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-09-18       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Estrogen receptor status in breast cancer is associated with remarkably distinct gene expression patterns.

Authors:  S Gruvberger; M Ringnér; Y Chen; S Panavally; L H Saal; M Fernö; C Peterson; P S Meltzer
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2001-08-15       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Genetic dissection of transcriptional regulation in budding yeast.

Authors:  Rachel B Brem; Gaël Yvert; Rebecca Clinton; Leonid Kruglyak
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-03-28       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Classification and diagnostic prediction of cancers using gene expression profiling and artificial neural networks.

Authors:  J Khan; J S Wei; M Ringnér; L H Saal; M Ladanyi; F Westermann; F Berthold; M Schwab; C R Antonescu; C Peterson; P S Meltzer
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 53.440

10.  Gene expression during the life cycle of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Michelle N Arbeitman; Eileen E M Furlong; Farhad Imam; Eric Johnson; Brian H Null; Bruce S Baker; Mark A Krasnow; Matthew P Scott; Ronald W Davis; Kevin P White
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-09-27       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Molecular markers from the transcribed/expressed region of the genome in higher plants.

Authors:  P K Gupta; S Rustgi
Journal:  Funct Integr Genomics       Date:  2004-04-17       Impact factor: 3.410

2.  Changes in gene expression in maize kernel in response to water and salt stress.

Authors:  Violeta Andjelkovic; Richard Thompson
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2005-12-14       Impact factor: 4.570

3.  Statistical power of expression quantitative trait loci for mapping of complex trait loci in natural populations.

Authors:  Paul Schliekelman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-02-03       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Addressing drought tolerance in maize by transcriptional profiling and mapping.

Authors:  Rosanna Marino; Maharajah Ponnaiah; Pawel Krajewski; Carla Frova; Luca Gianfranceschi; M Enrico Pè; Mirella Sari-Gorla
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2008-11-19       Impact factor: 3.291

5.  Novel candidate genes AuxRP and Hsp90 influence the chip color of potato tubers.

Authors:  Dorota Sołtys-Kalina; Katarzyna Szajko; Izabela Sierocka; Jadwiga Śliwka; Danuta Strzelczyk-Żyta; Iwona Wasilewicz-Flis; Henryka Jakuczun; Zofia Szweykowska-Kulinska; Waldemar Marczewski
Journal:  Mol Breed       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 2.589

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.