Literature DB >> 15093286

The public and effective risk communication.

Lynn Frewer1.   

Abstract

Public perceptions of risk have often been dismissed on the basis of "irrationality", and have tended to be excluded from policy processes by risk assessors and managers. People's responses to different risks are determined by psychological factors. The technical risk estimates traditionally provided by experts do not influence people's behaviours and responses in the same way as their risk perceptions. Some concerns are very specific to particular hazard. It is also important to communicate the difference between probability and variability associated with risk estimates. Risk communication must take account of the actual concerns of the public (for example, potential for negative environmental impact, unintended human health effects, or vulnerable groups within the population). When the public want information about a risk, they prefer a clear message regarding risks and associated uncertainties, including the nature and extent of disagreements between different experts. Furthermore, societal priorities for risk mitigation activities may not align with those identified by expert groups. Dismissing the former as irrelevant may result increased distrust in the motives of regulators and industry, with consequences for public confidence in regulatory activities linked to public protection. Awareness and understanding of public concerns must be the basis of an effective risk management strategy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15093286     DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2003.12.049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Lett        ISSN: 0378-4274            Impact factor:   4.372


  32 in total

Review 1.  Health concerns in UK Armed Forces personnel.

Authors:  Dominic Murphy; Neil Greenberg; Duncan Bland
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 2.  Risk perception and communication in sub-Saharan Africa.

Authors:  Alexander Dodoo; Bruce Hugman
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 5.606

3.  Reassuring or risky: the presentation of seafood safety in the aftermath of the British Petroleum Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill.

Authors:  Amelia L Greiner; Lisa P Lagasse; Roni A Neff; David C Love; Rachel Chase; Natasha Sokol; Katherine Clegg Smith
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 4.  Pharmaceutical Benefit-Risk Communication Tools: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Dominic Way; Hortense Blazsin; Ragnar Löfstedt; Frederic Bouder
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 5.606

5.  Technical assistance in the field of risk communication.

Authors:  Laura Maxim; Mario Mazzocchi; Stephan Van den Broucke; Fabiana Zollo; Tobin Robinson; Claire Rogers; Domagoj Vrbos; Giorgia Zamariola; Anthony Smith
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2021-04-29

6.  Citizens' Communication Needs and Attitudes to Risk in a Nuclear Accident Scenario: A Mixed Methods Study.

Authors:  Joel Rasmussen; Mats Eriksson; Johan Martinsson
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 4.614

7.  Pandemic influenza communication: views from a deliberative forum.

Authors:  Wendy A Rogers; Jackie M Street; Annette J Braunack-Mayer; Janet E Hiller
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  Communication of Scientific Uncertainty about a Novel Pandemic Health Threat: Ambiguity Aversion and Its Mechanisms.

Authors:  Paul K J Han; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Christine W Duarte; Megan Knaus; Adam Black; Aaron M Scherer; Angela Fagerlin
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2018-04-12

9.  Structural Topic Model Analysis of Mask-Wearing Issue Using International News Big Data.

Authors:  Kyeo Re Lee; Byungjun Kim; Dongyan Nan; Jang Hyun Kim
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Challenges created by data dissemination and access restrictions when attempting to address community concerns: individual privacy versus public wellbeing.

Authors:  Amy Colquhoun; Laura Aplin; Janis Geary; Karen J Goodman; Juanita Hatcher
Journal:  Int J Circumpolar Health       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 1.228

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.