Literature DB >> 15087792

Ex vivo measurement of intravertebral pressure during vertebroplasty.

Seiji Tomita1, Sean Molloy, Muneaki Abe, Stephen M Belkoff.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Ex vivo biomechanical study using cadaver vertebral bodies. OBJECTIVE.: To measure the increase in internal vertebral body pressure from cement injection during vertebroplasty. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Theoretically, the increased force required to inject polymerizing (viscous) cement into a vertebral body during vertebroplasty could produce a concomitant increase in intravertebral pressure and cause additional damage to the vertebral body. An alternative means of reducing intravertebral pressure during injection may be needed.
METHODS: We placed 11-gauge cannulas bipedicularly in six vertebral bodies from each of two fresh female cadaver spines (one osteoporotic, one normal). One cannula served as the injection route; a manometer was connected to the other. After immersion of the spines in a saline bath, the vertebral bodies were injected with 10 mL of Simplex P cement by depressing the syringe plunger at a rate of 7 mm/sec using a materials testing machine. Static pressure was measured before and after injection. Peak pressure was measured during injection. Maximum pressure elevation was calculated as peak pressure minus initial static pressure.
RESULTS: Maximum pressure elevation averaged (+/-SD) 9.4 +/- 8.5 mm Hg and 6.4 +/- 5.0 mm Hg in the osteoporotic and normal spines, respectively. In all cases (9 of 12) in which the pressure measurement system remained patent (i.e., not occluded by cement), postinjection pressure returned to the initial static pressure.
CONCLUSION: The increase in intravertebral body pressure from cement injection during vertebroplasty is minimal. Alternative means of reducing intervertebral pressure before injection may not be needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15087792     DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000116985.86437.04

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  8 in total

Review 1.  [Vertebroplasty: an update: value of percutaneous cement augmentation after randomized, placebo-controlled trials].

Authors:  P F Heini
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  A new cannula to ease cement injection during vertebroplasty.

Authors:  G Baroud; T Steffen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-01-26       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Percutaneous vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty: which one do I choose?

Authors:  John M Mathis
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 4.  Kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty: how good is the evidence?

Authors:  Fergus E McKiernan
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 5.  [Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty in patients with osteoporotic fractures: secured knowledge and open questions].

Authors:  K Bohndorf; R Fessl
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 0.635

6.  Vertebroplasty in the treatment of spine disease.

Authors:  G Ambrosanio; A Lavanga; P Vassallo; R Izzo; A A Diano; M Muto
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-02-10       Impact factor: 1.610

7.  Intravertebral pressure gradient during vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Markus Weisskopf; Oliver Miltner; Uwe Maus; Sascha Gravius; Jörg Axel Karl Ohnsorge
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2012-06-09       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  [Minimally invasive cement augmentation of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures with the new radiofrequency kyphoplasty].

Authors:  S G Mattyasovszky; A A Kurth; P Drees; J Gemidji; S Thomczyk; K Kafchitsas
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.154

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.