Literature DB >> 15084862

A technique to excise the descemet membrane from a recipient cornea (descemetorhexis).

Gerrit R J Melles1, Robert H J Wijdh, Carla P Nieuwendaal.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe a technique for excision of the Descemet membrane (DM) from the recipient eye for preparation of a recipient stromal bed in posterior lamellar keratoplasty.
METHODS: In 10 human eye bank eyes and 3 patients, recipient eyes had a 5.0-mm scleral tunnel incision made extending 1.0 mm into the peripheral cornea at the 12 o'clock surgical position. The anterior chamber was completely filled with air, and a reflective glide was placed through the incision onto the iris, to better visualize DM. A 9.0-mm mark was made onto the corneal epithelium to outline the area from which the Descemet membrane was to be removed. With a custom-made scraper, the DM was then carefully stripped off the posterior stroma by loosening the membrane at the 6 o'clock position and pulling it toward the incision at 12 o'clock. The excised DMs were evaluated by light and electron microscopy.
RESULTS: In all recipient eyes, DM could be easily and completely removed from the posterior corneal stroma. Microscopy showed isolated DMs without stromal tissue elements.
CONCLUSION: With the technique described, DM can be excised in a controlled fashion without damaging the posterior corneal stroma, to quickly create a recipient stromal bed before implantation of a donor posterior lamellar disk in posterior lamellar keratoplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15084862     DOI: 10.1097/00003226-200404000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cornea        ISSN: 0277-3740            Impact factor:   2.651


  71 in total

1.  [Immune reactions to posterior lamellar versus penetrating keratoplasty. A retrospective analysis].

Authors:  E Bertelmann; C Seeger; P Rieck; N Torun
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  [Influence of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements following Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK)].

Authors:  M K J Klamann; A-K B Maier; J Gonnermann; N Torun; P C Ruokonen
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 3.  [Lamellar keratoplasty. Back to the future?!].

Authors:  G Geerling; G I W Duncker; J Krumeich; G R J Melles
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 4.  Surgical alternatives to penetrating keratoplasty II: endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Kenneth M Goins
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 5.  "Small bubble technique" helps "big bubble technique".

Authors:  Francis W Price
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Use of an air-fluid exchange system to promote graft adhesion during Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  David M Meisler; William J Dupps; Douglas J Covert; Steven B Koenig
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.351

Review 7.  Adult keratoplasty: has the prognosis improved in the last 25 years?

Authors:  Francis W Price; Marianne O Price
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 8.  [Descemet's stripping with automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK)].

Authors:  C Cursiefen; F E Kruse
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.059

9.  Endothelial keratoplasty: clinical outcomes in the two years following deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis).

Authors:  Mark A Terry
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2007

10.  [Standardized Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK): technique and latest results].

Authors:  P P Ciechanowski; K Droutsas; L Baydoun; M Dirisamer; S Oellerich; G R J Melles
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.