Literature DB >> 18509031

Low-frequency local field potentials and spikes in primary visual cortex convey independent visual information.

Andrei Belitski1, Arthur Gretton, Cesare Magri, Yusuke Murayama, Marcelo A Montemurro, Nikos K Logothetis, Stefano Panzeri.   

Abstract

Local field potentials (LFPs) reflect subthreshold integrative processes that complement spike train measures. However, little is yet known about the differences between how LFPs and spikes encode rich naturalistic sensory stimuli. We addressed this question by recording LFPs and spikes from the primary visual cortex of anesthetized macaques while presenting a color movie. We then determined how the power of LFPs and spikes at different frequencies represents the visual features in the movie. We found that the most informative LFP frequency ranges were 1-8 and 60-100 Hz. LFPs in the range of 12-40 Hz carried little information about the stimulus, and may primarily reflect neuromodulatory inputs. Spike power was informative only at frequencies <12 Hz. We further quantified "signal correlations" (correlations in the trial-averaged power response to different stimuli) and "noise correlations" (trial-by-trial correlations in the fluctuations around the average) of LFPs and spikes recorded from the same electrode. We found positive signal correlation between high-gamma LFPs (60-100 Hz) and spikes, as well as strong positive signal correlation within high-gamma LFPs, suggesting that high-gamma LFPs and spikes are generated within the same network. LFPs <24 Hz shared strong positive noise correlations, indicating that they are influenced by a common source, such as a diffuse neuromodulatory input. LFPs <40 Hz showed very little signal and noise correlations with LFPs >40 Hz and with spikes, suggesting that low-frequency LFPs reflect neural processes that in natural conditions are fully decoupled from those giving rise to spikes and to high-gamma LFPs.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18509031      PMCID: PMC6670798          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0009-08.2008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  49 in total

1.  Fast oscillations display sharper orientation tuning than slower components of the same recordings in striate cortex of the awake monkey.

Authors:  A Frien; R Eckhorn; R Bauer; T Woelbern; A Gabriel
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.386

2.  Correlations and the encoding of information in the nervous system.

Authors:  S Panzeri; S R Schultz; A Treves; E T Rolls
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1999-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Periodicity and firing rate as candidate neural codes for the frequency of vibrotactile stimuli.

Authors:  E Salinas; A Hernandez; A Zainos; R Romo
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-07-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal.

Authors:  N K Logothetis; J Pauls; M Augath; T Trinath; A Oeltermann
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-07-12       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Theta oscillations in the hippocampus.

Authors:  György Buzsáki
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-01-31       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Ultra high-resolution fMRI in monkeys with implanted RF coils.

Authors:  Nikos Logothetis; Hellmut Merkle; Mark Augath; Torsten Trinath; Kâmil Ugurbil
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-07-18       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Role of experience and oscillations in transforming a rate code into a temporal code.

Authors:  M R Mehta; A K Lee; M A Wilson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-06-13       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Temporal structure in neuronal activity during working memory in macaque parietal cortex.

Authors:  Bijan Pesaran; John S Pezaris; Maneesh Sahani; Partha P Mitra; Richard A Andersen
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 24.884

9.  Visual stimulation elicits locked and induced gamma oscillations in monkey intracortical- and EEG-potentials, but not in human EEG.

Authors:  E Juergens; A Guettler; R Eckhorn
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  The role of spike timing in the coding of stimulus location in rat somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  S Panzeri; R S Petersen; S R Schultz; M Lebedev; M E Diamond
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 17.173

View more
  165 in total

1.  Relationships between spike-free local field potentials and spike timing in human temporal cortex.

Authors:  Stavros Zanos; Theodoros P Zanos; Vasilis Z Marmarelis; George A Ojemann; Eberhard E Fetz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Decoding 3D reach and grasp from hybrid signals in motor and premotor cortices: spikes, multiunit activity, and local field potentials.

Authors:  Arjun K Bansal; Wilson Truccolo; Carlos E Vargas-Irwin; John P Donoghue
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  The amplitude and timing of the BOLD signal reflects the relationship between local field potential power at different frequencies.

Authors:  Cesare Magri; Ulrich Schridde; Yusuke Murayama; Stefano Panzeri; Nikos K Logothetis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Sensory input drives multiple intracellular information streams in somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  Andrea Alenda; Manuel Molano-Mazón; Stefano Panzeri; Miguel Maravall
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Neural basis of global resting-state fMRI activity.

Authors:  Marieke L Schölvinck; Alexander Maier; Frank Q Ye; Jeff H Duyn; David A Leopold
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-05-03       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Frequency-dependent attentional modulation of local field potential signals in macaque area MT.

Authors:  Paul S Khayat; Robert Niebergall; Julio C Martinez-Trujillo
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Statistical comparison of spike responses to natural stimuli in monkey area V1 with simulated responses of a detailed laminar network model for a patch of V1.

Authors:  Malte J Rasch; Klaus Schuch; Nikos K Logothetis; Wolfgang Maass
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Trial-to-trial noise cancellation of cortical field potentials in awake macaques by autoregression model with exogenous input (ARX).

Authors:  Zheng Wang; Anna W Roe
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 2.390

9.  Surprise About Sensory Event Timing Drives Cortical Transients in the Beta Frequency Band.

Authors:  Thomas Meindertsma; Niels A Kloosterman; Andreas K Engel; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers; Tobias H Donner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Frequency-band signatures of visual responses to naturalistic input in ferret primary visual cortex during free viewing.

Authors:  Kristin K Sellers; Davis V Bennett; Flavio Fröhlich
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 3.252

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.