Frederick H Bagley1. 1. Department of Surgery, Rutland Regional Medical Center, Rutland, VT 05701, USA. fbagley@rrmc.org
Abstract
HYPOTHESIS: Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) mammography, after positive fine-needle aspiration (FNA) or stereotactic biopsy, may alter surgical management of the index breast cancer. DESIGN: Review of MRI mammograms compared with conventional mammograms and clinical examination. SETTING: Rural community hospital. PATIENTS: Consecutive cohort of 27 patients with breast cancer who underwent prebiopsy or preoperative MRI mammography. INTERVENTION: Surgical management of breast cancer. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Change in surgical management prompted by findings on MRI mammography. RESULTS: Prebiopsy or preoperative MRI mammography changed surgical management in 13 (48%) of 27 patients with breast cancer by discovering multicentric cancers or more extensive cancer. Of the 27 patients, 9 with positive FNA biopsy results of palpable masses underwent preoperative MRI; in 6 of the 9, ipsilateral multicentric cancers or more extensive cancer was discovered that necessitated mastectomy rather than breast conservation. Eighteen of the 27 patients had category 4/5 mammograms. Ten of these patients had stereotactic biopsies followed by MRI; 4 of the 10 had changes on the MRIs that required mastectomy rather than breast conservation. Eight of the 27 patients had MRI before stereotactic biopsy; 3 of the 8 had MRI abnormalities that required mastectomy. One patient had contralateral, multicentric cancers not seen on conventional mammography, necessitating bilateral mastectomies. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend that patients who desire breast conservation undergo MRI mammography before biopsy of a category 4/5 mammogram or immediately after a positive FNA biopsy result of a palpable mass.
HYPOTHESIS: Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) mammography, after positive fine-needle aspiration (FNA) or stereotactic biopsy, may alter surgical management of the index breast cancer. DESIGN: Review of MRI mammograms compared with conventional mammograms and clinical examination. SETTING: Rural community hospital. PATIENTS: Consecutive cohort of 27 patients with breast cancer who underwent prebiopsy or preoperative MRI mammography. INTERVENTION: Surgical management of breast cancer. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Change in surgical management prompted by findings on MRI mammography. RESULTS: Prebiopsy or preoperative MRI mammography changed surgical management in 13 (48%) of 27 patients with breast cancer by discovering multicentric cancers or more extensive cancer. Of the 27 patients, 9 with positive FNA biopsy results of palpable masses underwent preoperative MRI; in 6 of the 9, ipsilateral multicentric cancers or more extensive cancer was discovered that necessitated mastectomy rather than breast conservation. Eighteen of the 27 patients had category 4/5 mammograms. Ten of these patients had stereotactic biopsies followed by MRI; 4 of the 10 had changes on the MRIs that required mastectomy rather than breast conservation. Eight of the 27 patients had MRI before stereotactic biopsy; 3 of the 8 had MRI abnormalities that required mastectomy. One patient had contralateral, multicentric cancers not seen on conventional mammography, necessitating bilateral mastectomies. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend that patients who desire breast conservation undergo MRI mammography before biopsy of a category 4/5 mammogram or immediately after a positive FNA biopsy result of a palpable mass.
Authors: Kaoru Itakura; Juan Lessing; Theadora Sakata; Amy Heinzerling; Eline Vriens; Dorota Wisner; Michael Alvarado; Laura Esserman; Cheryl Ewing; Nola Hylton; E Shelley Hwang Journal: Clin Breast Cancer Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 3.225
Authors: Wendy B DeMartini; Laura Ichikawa; Bonnie C Yankaskas; Diana Buist; Karla Kerlikowske; Berta Geller; Tracy Onega; Robert D Rosenberg; Constance D Lehman Journal: J Am Coll Radiol Date: 2010-11 Impact factor: 5.532
Authors: Wendy B Demartini; Brenda F Kurland; Robert L Gutierrez; C Craig Blackmore; Sue Peacock; Constance D Lehman Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2011-02-27 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: María Nieves Plana; Carmen Carreira; Alfonso Muriel; Miguel Chiva; Víctor Abraira; Jose Ignacio Emparanza; Xavier Bonfill; Javier Zamora Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2011-08-17 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Wendy B DeMartini; Lucy Hanna; Constantine Gatsonis; Mary C Mahoney; Constance D Lehman Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2012-09 Impact factor: 3.959