Literature DB >> 15073852

Biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy in men with pathologic organ-confined disease: pT2a versus pT2b.

Stephen J Freedland1, Alan W Partin, Jonathan I Epstein, Patrick C Walsh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The 1997 TNM staging system for prostate carcinoma defines a pT2a disease as a tumor histologically involving one lobe of the prostate and pT2b disease as a tumor histologically involving both prostatic lobes. Whether this distinction provides prognostic significance is unclear. The authors evaluated biochemical outcomes between men with pT2aN0 and pT2bN0 disease.
METHODS: The authors identified 1606 men with organ-confined disease (pT2N0) who were treated with radical prostatectomy between 1982 and 2003 by one surgeon. Clinical characteristics were compared between men with pT2a and pT2b tumors using rank-sum analysis, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) recurrence data were compared using log-rank analysis. The significant independent predictors of PSA recurrence were determined using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences between men with pT2a and pT2b tumors at the time of surgery in terms of clinicopathologic characteristics (biopsy and pathologic Gleason score, serum PSA level, clinical stage, and age). Log-rank analysis revealed no significant differences in time to PSA recurrence between men with pT2a and pT2b tumors (P = 0.755). The 10-year PSA progression-free survival rate was 95% (confidence interval [CI], 92-97%) for men with pT2a tumors and 93% (CI, 90-95%) for men with pT2b tumors. Multivariate analysis showed that the significant predictors of PSA recurrence included serum PSA level, biopsy and pathologic Gleason score, and clinical stage. In the current cohort of men with organ-confined disease, pathologic stage (pT2a vs. pT2b) was not a significant predictor of PSA recurrence on multivariate analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in PSA recurrence rates between men with pT2aN0 versus pT2bN0 tumors. In men with organ-confined disease, radical prostatectomy provided excellent 10-year PSA progression-free survival regardless of tumor burden (pT2a vs. pT2b). Consideration should be given to modifying the TNM staging system to eliminate substratification of pT2 tumors. Copyright 2004 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15073852     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.20145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  14 in total

1.  Recommendations for the reporting of prostate carcinoma.

Authors:  Jonathan I Epstein; John Srigley; David Grignon; Peter Humphrey; Christopher Otis
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  Total intraglandular and index tumor volumes predict biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Su-Jin Shin; Cheol Keun Park; Sung Yoon Park; Won Sik Jang; Joo Yong Lee; Young Deuk Choi; Nam Hoon Cho
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  In Organ-confined Prostate Cancer, Tumor Quantitation Not Found to Aid in Prediction of Biochemical Recurrence.

Authors:  Yujiro Ito; Emily A Vertosick; Daniel D Sjoberg; Andrew J Vickers; Hikmat A Al-Ahmadie; Ying-Bei Chen; Anuradha Gopalan; Sahussapont J Sirintrapun; Satish K Tickoo; James A Eastham; Peter T Scardino; Victor E Reuter; Samson W Fine
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 6.394

4.  Should pathologists continue to use the current pT2 substaging system for reporting of radical prostatectomy specimens?

Authors:  Athanase Billis; Luciana L Meirelles; Leandro L L Freitas; Luis A Magna; Leonardo O Reis; Ubirajara Ferreira
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2011-02-20       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  High dose brachytherapy (real time) in patients with intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer: technical description and preliminary experience.

Authors:  Pedro J Prada Gómez; Angeles de la Rua Calderón; Inmaculada Romo Fonseca; Miguel Evia Suárez; José Manuel Abascal García; Germán Juan Rijo; José Fernández García; José Manuel González Sancho; Ramón Abascal García; Reinerio Rodríguez-Fernández
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.405

6.  Development and validation of a 32-gene prognostic index for prostate cancer progression.

Authors:  Chin-Lee Wu; Brock E Schroeder; Xiao-Jun Ma; Christopher J Cutie; Shulin Wu; Ranelle Salunga; Yi Zhang; Michael W Kattan; Catherine A Schnabel; Mark G Erlander; W Scott McDougal
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Evaluation of clinical staging of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (eighth edition) for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Wen-Jun Xiao; Yu Zhu; Yao Zhu; Bo Dai; Ding-Wei Ye
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Natural history of pathologically organ-confined (pT2), Gleason score 6 or less, prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  David J Hernandez; Matthew E Nielsen; Misop Han; Bruce J Trock; Alan W Partin; Patrick C Walsh; Jonathan I Epstein
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 9.  Tumor focality in prostate cancer: implications for focal therapy.

Authors:  Markos Karavitakis; Hashim U Ahmed; Paul D Abel; Steven Hazell; Mathias H Winkler
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 66.675

10.  How localized is pathologically localized prostate cancer? The use of secondary circulating prostate cells as a marker of minimal residual disease and their association with patient outcome.

Authors:  Nigel P Murray; Socrates Aedo; Cynthia Fuentealba; Eduardo Reyes; Omar Jacob
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2017-12-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.