BACKGROUND: Government legislators and research ethics boards in some jurisdictions require all patients to give written informed consent before enrollment in clinical registries. However, the effect of such a requirement on the use of clinical registries and the extent to which registry data can be generalized remain uncertain. METHODS: We examined the effectiveness of a comprehensive attempt to obtain informed consent between June 2001 and December 2002 on the overall participation rate and the characteristics of participating patients in the Registry of the Canadian Stroke Network, a prospective registry based at 20 major stroke centers across Canada. RESULTS: The overall participation rate (i.e., the consent rate among all potential participants) was 39.3 percent of 4285 eligible patients during phase 1 of the project (June 2001 through February 2002) and 50.6 percent of 2823 eligible patients during phase 2 (June 2002 through December 2002), despite the presence of neurologic research nurse coordinators at each site. Many patients died or left the hospital before they could be approached for consent. Major selection biases were found; the in-hospital mortality rate was much lower among patients who were enrolled (6.9 percent) than among those who were not enrolled (21.7 percent) (relative risk of in-hospital death, 3.13; 95 percent confidence interval, 2.65 to 3.70; P<0.001). We estimate that approximately 500,000 dollars (Canadian dollars) was spent on consent-related issues during the first two years of the registry. CONCLUSIONS: Obtaining written informed consent for participation in a stroke registry led to important selection biases, such that registry patients were not representative of the typical patient with stroke at each center. These findings highlight the need for legislation on privacy and policies permitting waivers of informed consent for minimal-risk observational research. Copyright 2004 Massachusetts Medical Society
BACKGROUND: Government legislators and research ethics boards in some jurisdictions require all patients to give written informed consent before enrollment in clinical registries. However, the effect of such a requirement on the use of clinical registries and the extent to which registry data can be generalized remain uncertain. METHODS: We examined the effectiveness of a comprehensive attempt to obtain informed consent between June 2001 and December 2002 on the overall participation rate and the characteristics of participating patients in the Registry of the Canadian Stroke Network, a prospective registry based at 20 major stroke centers across Canada. RESULTS: The overall participation rate (i.e., the consent rate among all potential participants) was 39.3 percent of 4285 eligible patients during phase 1 of the project (June 2001 through February 2002) and 50.6 percent of 2823 eligible patients during phase 2 (June 2002 through December 2002), despite the presence of neurologic research nurse coordinators at each site. Many patients died or left the hospital before they could be approached for consent. Major selection biases were found; the in-hospital mortality rate was much lower among patients who were enrolled (6.9 percent) than among those who were not enrolled (21.7 percent) (relative risk of in-hospital death, 3.13; 95 percent confidence interval, 2.65 to 3.70; P<0.001). We estimate that approximately 500,000 dollars (Canadian dollars) was spent on consent-related issues during the first two years of the registry. CONCLUSIONS: Obtaining written informed consent for participation in a stroke registry led to important selection biases, such that registry patients were not representative of the typical patient with stroke at each center. These findings highlight the need for legislation on privacy and policies permitting waivers of informed consent for minimal-risk observational research. Copyright 2004 Massachusetts Medical Society
Authors: Robert W Yeh; Matthew J Czarny; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Dean J Kereiakes; David R Holmes; Ralph G Brindis; W Douglas Weaver; John S Rumsfeld; Matthew T Roe; Sunghee Kim; Priscilla Driscoll-Shempp; Laura Mauri Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2014-11-16
Authors: Emily P Zeitler; Sana M Al-Khatib; Joseph P Drozda; Larry G Kessler; Ajay J Kirtane; David F Kong; John Laschinger; Danica Marinac-Dabic; Marie-Claude Morice; Terrie Reed; Art Sedrakyan; Kenneth M Stein; James Tcheng; Mitchell W Krucoff Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2015-07-30 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Mohammad H Rahbar; Erin E Fox; Deborah J del Junco; Bryan A Cotton; Jeanette M Podbielski; Nena Matijevic; Mitchell J Cohen; Martin A Schreiber; Jiajie Zhang; Parsa Mirhaji; Sarah J Duran; Robert J Reynolds; Ruby Benjamin-Garner; John B Holcomb Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2011-10-12 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Araceli Busby; Annukka Ritvanen; Helen Dolk; Nicola Armstrong; Hermien De Walle; Isolina Riaño-Galán; Miriam Gatt; Robert McDonnell; Vera Nelen; David Stone Journal: BMJ Date: 2005-07-16