Literature DB >> 15070242

Verification of step-and-shoot IMRT delivery using a fast video-based electronic portal imaging device.

Omar A Zeidan1, Jonathan G Li, Manisha Ranade, Anthony M Stell, James F Dempsey.   

Abstract

We present an investigation into the use of a fast video-based electronic portal-imaging device (EPID) to study intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) delivery. The aim of this study is to test the feasibility of using an EPID system to independently measure the orchestration of collimator leaf motion and beam fluence; simultaneously measuring both the delivered field fluence and shape as it exits the accelerator head during IMRT delivery. A fast EPID that consists of a terbium-doped gadolinium oxysulphide (GdO2S:Tb) scintillator coupled with an inexpensive commercial 30 frames-per-second (FPS) CCD-video recorder (16.7 ms shutter time) was employed for imaging IMRT delivery. The measurements were performed on a Varian 2100 C/D linear accelerator equipped with a 120-leaf multileaf-collimator (MLC). A characterization of the EPID was performed that included measurements of spatial resolution, linac pulse-rate dependence, linear output response, signal uniformity, and imaging artifacts. The average pixel intensity for fields imaged with the EPID was found to be linear in the delivered monitor units of static non-IMRT fields between 3x3 and 15x15 cm2. A systematic increase of the average pixel intensity was observed with increasing field size, leading to a maximum variation of 8%. Deliveries of a clinical step-and-shoot mode leaf sequence were imaged at 600 MU/min. Measurements from this IMRT delivery were compared with experimentally validated MLC controller log files and were found to agree to within 5%. An analysis of the EPID image data allowed identification of three types of errors: (1) 5 out of 35 segments were undelivered; (2) redistributing all of the delivered segment MUs; and (3) leaf movement during segment delivery. Measurements with the EPID at lower dose rates showed poor agreement with log files due to an aliasing artifact. The study was extended to use a high-speed camera (1-1000 FPS and 10 micros shutter time) with our EPID to image the same delivery to demonstrate the feasibility of imaging without aliasing artifacts. High-speed imaging was shown to be a promising direction toward validating IMRT deliveries with reasonable image resolution and noise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15070242     DOI: 10.1118/1.1644518

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  5 in total

1.  Detailed analysis of latencies in image-based dynamic MLC tracking.

Authors:  Per Rugaard Poulsen; Byungchul Cho; Amit Sawant; Dan Ruan; Paul J Keall
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Development of multi-planar dose verification by use of a flat panel EPID for intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Yuji Nakaguchi; Fujio Araki; Tomohiro Kouno; Takeshi Ono; Kazunari Hioki
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2012-12-11

3.  Comparison of MLC positioning deviations using log files and establishment of specific assessment parameters for different accelerators with IMRT and VMAT.

Authors:  Xiutong Lin; Tao Sun; Xiao Liu; Guifang Zhang; Yong Yin
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-07-16       Impact factor: 4.309

4.  On the sensitivity of patient-specific IMRT QA to MLC positioning errors.

Authors:  Guanghua Yan; Chihray Liu; Thomas A Simon; Lee-Cheng Peng; Christopher Fox; Jonathan G Li
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2009-02-05       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  An EPID-based system for gantry-resolved MLC quality assurance for VMAT.

Authors:  Benjamin J Zwan; Michael P Barnes; Todsaporn Fuangord; Cameron J Stanton; Daryl J O'Connor; Paul J Keall; Peter B Greer
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 2.102

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.