Literature DB >> 15069141

Shelf age of the polyethylene tibial component and outcome of unicondylar knee arthroplasty.

Matthew B Collier1, C Anderson Engh, Gerard A Engh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A recent report linked shelf-aging of unicondylar polyethylene tibial components with accelerated fatigue wear and rapid failure. We retrospectively reviewed our experiences with another unicondylar knee system to investigate the relationship between the shelf age of the polyethylene components and clinical outcome.
METHODS: One hundred Single Compartment Replacement unicompartmental knee arthroplasties were performed with cement between 1990 and 1996. The median shelf age for the polyethylene inserts was 1.7 years. At the time of the review, four knees had been lost to follow-up, sixteen were in patients who had died, and nineteen had been revised. Sixty-one knee replacements remained in situ at a mean and standard deviation of 8 +/- 2 years postoperatively.
RESULTS: With revision as the end point, Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis demonstrated a six-year rate of survival of 96% when the shelf age of the insert was less than the median shelf age but only 71% when the median shelf age was exceeded. Fatigue wear was identified on all retrieved components except for two that had shelf ages under one year and had been revised within three years. At four to six years of clinical follow-up, the group of knees in which the median shelf age had been exceeded also had poorer Knee Society knee scores and function scores.
CONCLUSIONS: Aging on the shelf accelerated fatigue failure of polyethylene inserts sterilized with gamma irradiation in air and compromised our intermediate-term clinical outcomes with this unicondylar knee replacement system. Attention to the relationship between the shelf age and the clinical performance of the polyethylene component continues to be warranted with unicondylar knee arthroplasty implants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15069141     DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200404000-00014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  7 in total

1.  Durability of a cruciate-retaining TKA with modular tibial trays at 20 years.

Authors:  John J Callaghan; Mitchell W Beckert; David W Hennessy; Devon D Goetz; Scott S Kelley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Current evidence base for kinematic alignment.

Authors:  L-R Tuecking; P Savov; H Windhagen; M Ettinger
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Routine surveillance of modular PFC TKA shows increasing failures after 10 years.

Authors:  Andrew S Malin; John J Callaghan; Kevin J Bozic; Steve S Liu; Devon D Goetz; Nicholas Sullivan; Scott S Kelley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  History and systematic review of wear and osteolysis outcomes for first-generation highly crosslinked polyethylene.

Authors:  Steven M Kurtz; Heather A Gawel; Jasmine D Patel
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Analysis of revision procedures for failed unicondylar knee replacement.

Authors:  K O Oduwole; M K Sayana; F Onayemi; T McCarthy; J O'Byrne
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 6.  [Implant with a mobile or a fixed bearing in unicompartmental knee joint replacemen].

Authors:  G Matziolis; S Tohtz; B Gengenbach; C Perka
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  Oxford Phase 3 unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: medium-term results of a minimally invasive surgical procedure.

Authors:  Lukas A Lisowski; Michel P J van den Bekerom; Peter Pilot; C Niek van Dijk; Andrzej E Lisowski
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-07-17       Impact factor: 4.342

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.