Literature DB >> 15066391

The spatial distribution of visual attention.

Joetta L Gobell1, Chia-huei Tseng, George Sperling.   

Abstract

We use a novel search task to investigate the spatial distribution of visual attention, developing a general model from the data. Observers distribute attention to locations defined by stripes with a high penalty for attention to intervening areas. Attended areas are defined by a square-wave grating. A target is in one of the even stripes, and ten false targets (identical to the real target) are in the odd stripes; the observer must attend the even stripes and strongly ignore the odd, reporting the location of the target. As the spatial frequency of the grating increases, performance declines. Variations on this task inform a model that incorporates stimulus input, a "low pass" attentional modulation transfer function, and an acuity function to produce a strength map from which the location with the highest strength is selected. A feature-strength map that adds to the attention map enables the model to predict the results of attention-cued conjunction search experiments, and internal noise enables it to predict the outcome of double-pass experiments and of variations in the number of false targets. The model predicted performance on a trial-by-trial basis for three observers, accounting for approximately 70% of the trials. Actual trial-to-trial variation for an observer, using the double-pass method, is about 76%. For any requested distribution of spatial attention, this general model makes a prediction of the actually achieved distribution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15066391     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2004.01.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  14 in total

1.  Attentional costs in multiple-object tracking.

Authors:  Michael Tombu; Adriane E Seiffert
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2008-02-20

2.  Using a filtering task to measure the spatial extent of selective attention.

Authors:  John Palmer; Cathleen M Moore
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  The attentional field revealed by single-voxel modeling of fMRI time courses.

Authors:  Alexander M Puckett; Edgar A DeYoe
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Temporal dynamics of divided spatial attention.

Authors:  Sirawaj Itthipuripat; Javier O Garcia; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Modulation of early cortical processing during divided attention to non-contiguous locations.

Authors:  Hans-Peter Frey; Anita M Schmid; Jeremy W Murphy; Sophie Molholm; Edmund C Lalor; John J Foxe
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 3.386

6.  Distinguishing blocking from attenuation in visual selective attention.

Authors:  Serap Yigit-Elliott; John Palmer; Cathleen M Moore
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-05-06

7.  Flexible attention system: Appearance time of split attention changes in accordance with the task difficulty level.

Authors:  Guangyao Zu; Hanbin Sang; Heng Zhou; Fan Zhang; Xiaogang Wu; Aijun Wang; Ming Zhang
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 2.157

8.  The topography of visuospatial attention as revealed by a novel visual field mapping technique.

Authors:  Julie A Brefczynski-Lewis; Ritobrato Datta; James W Lewis; Edgar A DeYoe
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Categorically defined targets trigger spatiotemporal visual attention.

Authors:  Brad Wyble; Howard Bowman; Mary C Potter
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Neural strategies for selective attention distinguish fast-action video game players.

Authors:  Lavanya Krishnan; Albert Kang; George Sperling; Ramesh Srinivasan
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 3.020

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.