Literature DB >> 15064885

Illusions as a tool to study the coding of pointing movements.

Denise D J de Grave1, Eli Brenner, Jeroen B J Smeets.   

Abstract

Pictorial illusions bias our judgments about certain visual attributes. Such illusions are therefore only expected to influence a task if these attributes are used to perform the task. When pointing to a position, different visual attributes could be used to guide the hand: direction and distance (or length) of the required displacement (vector coding) or the final position (position coding). In this study we used the Brentano illusion (an illusion of length) to determine which attributes are used in pointing. Several conditions were tested in which the visibility of the hand and the stimulus were varied. The illusion influenced movements between two points along the shaft of the figure, but not movements perpendicular to the shaft. When the hand and/or target were invisible during the movement, the influence of the illusion increased. Pointing movements under different visual conditions were based on different relative contributions of position and vector coding. The contribution of vector coding was always rather modest.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 15064885     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-003-1708-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  20 in total

1.  Endpoints of arm movements to visual targets.

Authors:  J J van den Dobbelsteen; E Brenner; J B Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Dynamic illusion effects in a reaching task: evidence for separate visual representations in the planning and control of reaching.

Authors:  S R Glover; P Dixon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Dynamic effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion in grasping: support for a planning/control model of action.

Authors:  Scott Glover; Peter Dixon
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2002-02

4.  Are the original Roelofs effect and the induced Roelofs effect caused by the same shift in straight ahead?

Authors:  Denise D J de Grave; Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Is there dissociation of perceptual and motor responses to figural illusions?

Authors:  R B Post; R B Welch
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  Frames of reference and control parameters in visuomanual pointing.

Authors:  P Vindras; P Viviani
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Differential effect of task conditions on errors of direction and extent of reaching movements.

Authors:  J Messier; J F Kalaska
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Goal-directed arm movements in absence of visual guidance: evidence for amplitude rather than position control.

Authors:  O Bock; R Eckmiller
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  The dissociation of position and extent in Müller-Lyer figures.

Authors:  A Mack; F Heuer; K Villardi; D Chambers
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1985-04

10.  Viewer-centered and body-centered frames of reference in direct visuomotor transformations.

Authors:  M Carrozzo; J McIntyre; M Zago; F Lacquaniti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  21 in total

1.  Manual-aiming bias and the Müller-Lyer illusion: the roles of position and extent information.

Authors:  John Predebon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-01-15       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Müller-Lyer figures influence the online reorganization of visually guided grasping movements.

Authors:  Matthew Heath; Christina Rival; Kristina Neely; Olav Krigolson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-16       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The type of visual information mediates eye and hand movement bias when aiming to a Müller-Lyer illusion.

Authors:  Ann Lavrysen; Werner F Helsen; Digby Elliott; Martinus J Buekers; Peter Feys; Elke Heremans
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-05-23       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Grasping the Müller-Lyer illusion: not a change in perceived length.

Authors:  Marianne Biegstraaten; Denise D J de Grave; Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-12-05       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Sensory integration does not lead to sensory calibration.

Authors:  Jeroen B J Smeets; John J van den Dobbelsteen; Denise D J de Grave; Robert J van Beers; Eli Brenner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-11-27       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The Brentano illusion influences goal-directed movements of the left and right hand to the same extent.

Authors:  Denise D J de Grave; Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-11-15       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Reaction times for allocentric movements are 35 ms slower than reaction times for target-directed movements.

Authors:  Lore Thaler; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-24       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Generalization via superposition: combined effects of mixed reference frame representations for explicit and implicit learning in a visuomotor adaptation task.

Authors:  Eugene Poh; Jordan A Taylor
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  The effect of the Müller-Lyer illusion on saccades is modulated by spatial predictability and saccadic latency.

Authors:  Denise D J de Grave; Nicola Bruno
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-09       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  The Poggendorff illusion affects manual pointing as well as perceptual judgements.

Authors:  Dean R Melmoth; Marc S Tibber; Simon Grant; Michael J Morgan
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.