Literature DB >> 15063537

Cytogenetic dose-response and adaptive response in cells of ungulate species exposed to ionizing radiation.

B A Ulsh1, S M Miller, F F Mallory, R E J Mitchel, D P Morrison, D R Boreham.   

Abstract

In the studies reported here, the micronucleus assay, a common cytogenetic technique, was used to examine the dose-responses in fibroblasts from three ungulate species (white-tailed deer, woodland caribou, and Indian muntjac) exposed to high doses of ionizing radiation (1-4 Gy of (60)Co gamma radiation). This assay was also used to examine the effects of exposure to low doses (1-100 mGy) typical of what these species experience in a year from natural and anthropogenic environmental sources. An adaptive response, defined as the induction of resistance to a stressor by a prior exposure to a small "adapting" stress, was observed after exposure to low doses. This work indicates that very small doses are protective for the endpoint examined. The same level of protection was seen at all adapting doses, including 1 radiation track per cell, the lowest possible cellular dose. These results are consistent with other studies in a wide variety of organisms that demonstrate a protective effect of low doses at both cellular and whole-organism levels. This implies that environmental regulations predicated on the idea that even the smallest dose of radiation carries a quantifiable risk of direct adverse consequences to the exposed organism require further examination. Cytogenetic assays provide affordable and feasible biological effects-based alternatives that are more biologically relevant than traditional contaminant concentration-based radioecological risk assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15063537     DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2004.01.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Radioact        ISSN: 0265-931X            Impact factor:   2.674


  14 in total

1.  Nucleoplasmic bridges and tailed nuclei are signatures of radiation exposure in Oreochromis mossambicus using erythrocyte micronucleus cytome assay (EMNCA).

Authors:  S Anbumani; Mary N Mohankumar
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Monte carlo simulations of dose from microCT imaging procedures in a realistic mouse phantom.

Authors:  Richard Taschereau; Patrick L Chow; Arion F Chatziioannou
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Low doses of radiation are protective in vitro and in vivo: evolutionary origins.

Authors:  R E J Mitchel
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-08-19       Impact factor: 2.658

4.  The bystander effect: recent developments and implications for understanding the dose response.

Authors:  R E J Mitchel
Journal:  Nonlinearity Biol Toxicol Med       Date:  2004-07

5.  The new radiobiology: returning to our roots.

Authors:  Brant A Ulsh
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2012-07-15       Impact factor: 2.658

6.  Could contaminant induced mutations lead to a genetic diversity overestimation?

Authors:  Olímpia Sobral; Maria Aparecida Marin-Morales; Rui Ribeiro
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2013-05-18       Impact factor: 2.823

7.  Physiological responses of the halophilic archaeon Halobacterium sp. strain NRC1 to desiccation and gamma irradiation.

Authors:  Molly Kottemann; Adrienne Kish; Chika Iloanusi; Sarah Bjork; Jocelyne DiRuggiero
Journal:  Extremophiles       Date:  2005-04-21       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 8.  Radioadaptive response revisited.

Authors:  Soile Tapio; Vesna Jacob
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 1.925

9.  Cancer and low dose responses in vivo: implications for radiation protection.

Authors:  R E J Mitchel
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2007-09-10       Impact factor: 2.658

10.  The micronucleus frequency in cytokinesis-blocked lymphocytes of cattle in the vicinity of a nuclear power plant.

Authors:  Hae-June Lee; Chang-Mo Kang; Se-Ra Kim; Jong-Choon Kim; Chun-Sik Bae; Ki-Seok Oh; Sung-Kee Jo; Tae-Hwan Kim; Jong-Sik Jang; Sung-Ho Kim
Journal:  J Vet Sci       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.672

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.