Literature DB >> 15061740

Communication factors in the follow-up of abnormal mammograms.

Eric G Poon1, Jennifer S Haas, Ann Louise Puopolo, Tejal K Gandhi, Elisabeth Burdick, David W Bates, Troyen A Brennan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify the communication factors that are significantly associated with appropriate short-term follow-up of abnormal mammograms.
DESIGN: Prospective longitudinal study involving medical record review and patient survey.
SETTING: Ten academically affiliated ambulatory medical practices in the Boston metropolitan area. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred twenty-six women with abnormal mammograms requiring short-term (6 months) follow-up imaging. MEASUREMENTS: Proportion of women in the study who received appropriate follow-up care.
RESULTS: Eighty-one (64%) of the women with abnormal mammograms requiring short-term follow-up imaging received the appropriate follow-up care. After adjusting for patients' age and insurance status, 2 communication factors were found to be independently associated with the delivery of appropriate follow-up care: 1). physicians' documentation of a follow-up plan in the medical record (adjusted odds ratio, 2.79; 95% confidence interval, 1.11 to 6.98; P =.029); and 2). patients' understanding of the need for follow-up (adjusted odds ratio, 3.86; 95% confidence interval, 1.50 to 9.96; P =.006). None of the patients' clinical or psychological characteristics were associated with the delivery of appropriate follow-up care.
CONCLUSIONS: Follow-up care for women with abnormal mammograms requiring short-term follow-up imaging is suboptimal. Documentation of the follow-up plan by the physician and understanding of the follow-up plan by the patient are important factors that are correlated with the receipt of appropriate follow-up care for these women. Interventions designed to improve the quality of result follow-up in the outpatient setting should address these issues in patient-doctor communication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15061740      PMCID: PMC1492194          DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30357.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  26 in total

1.  Adverse events in primary care identified from a risk-management database.

Authors:  G Fischer; M D Fetters; A P Munro; E B Goldman
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 0.493

2.  Promoting patient safety by preventing medical error.

Authors:  L L Leape; D D Woods; M J Hatlie; K W Kizer; S A Schroeder; G D Lundberg
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-10-28       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Breast pain causes noncompliance with mammography and self-examination.

Authors:  N Porter-Steele
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1996-09-15       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Omission-related malpractice claims and the limits of defensive medicine.

Authors:  R L Kravitz; J E Rolph; L Petersen
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.929

5.  Timeliness of follow-up after abnormal screening mammography.

Authors:  K Kerlikowske
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Time.

Authors:  F Davidoff
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1997-09-15       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Health literacy: report of the Council on Scientific Affairs. Ad Hoc Committee on Health Literacy for the Council on Scientific Affairs, American Medical Association.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-02-10       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Reducing loss-to-follow-up among women with abnormal Pap smears. Results from a randomized trial testing an intensive follow-up protocol and economic incentives.

Authors:  A C Marcus; C P Kaplan; L A Crane; J S Berek; G Bernstein; J E Gunning; M W McClatchey
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Racial differences in timeliness of follow-up after abnormal screening mammography.

Authors:  S W Chang; K Kerlikowske; A Nápoles-Springer; S F Posner; E A Sickles; E J Pérez-Stable
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1996-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  The breast imaging reporting and data system: positive predictive value of mammographic features and final assessment categories.

Authors:  L Liberman; A F Abramson; F B Squires; J R Glassman; E A Morris; D D Dershaw
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  46 in total

1.  Urban women's preferences for learning of their mammogram result: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Erin N Marcus; Darlene Drummond; Noella Dietz
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Leading the way in breast cancer screening and prevention.

Authors:  Katrina Armstrong
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Does integrating nonurgent, clinically significant radiology alerts within the electronic health record impact closed-loop communication and follow-up?

Authors:  Stacy D O'Connor; Anuj K Dalal; V Anik Sahni; Ronilda Lacson; Ramin Khorasani
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Psychological distress, social withdrawal, and coping following receipt of an abnormal mammogram among different ethnicities: a mediation model.

Authors:  Yamile Molina; Shirley A A Beresford; Noah Espinoza; Beti Thompson
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.172

5.  Psychosocial determinants of mammography follow-up after receipt of abnormal mammography results in medically underserved women.

Authors:  Alecia Malin Fair; Debra Wujcik; Jin-Mann Sally Lin; Wei Zheng; Kathleen M Egan; Ana M Grau; Victoria L Champion; Kenneth A Wallston
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2010-02

6.  Conversations about Abnormal Mammograms on Distress and Timely Follow-up Across Ethnicity.

Authors:  Yamile Molina; Shirley A A Beresford; Tara Hayes Constant; Beti Thompson
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.037

7.  Provider management strategies of abnormal test result alerts: a cognitive task analysis.

Authors:  Sylvia J Hysong; Mona K Sawhney; Lindsay Wilson; Dean F Sittig; Donna Espadas; Traber Davis; Hardeep Singh
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  How do breast imaging centers communicate results to women with limited English proficiency and other barriers to care?

Authors:  Erin N Marcus; Tulay Koru-Sengul; Feng Miao; Monica Yepes; Lee Sanders
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2014-06

9.  Predictors of timely follow-up after abnormal cancer screening among women seeking care at urban community health centers.

Authors:  Tracy A Battaglia; M Christina Santana; Sharon Bak; Manjusha Gokhale; Timothy L Lash; Arlene S Ash; Richard Kalish; Stephen Tringale; James O Taylor; Karen M Freund
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Timely follow-up of abnormal diagnostic imaging test results in an outpatient setting: are electronic medical records achieving their potential?

Authors:  Hardeep Singh; Eric J Thomas; Shrinidi Mani; Dean Sittig; Harvinder Arora; Donna Espadas; Myrna M Khan; Laura A Petersen
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2009-09-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.