Literature DB >> 15058379

Little epistasis for anxiety-related measures in the DeFries strains of laboratory mice.

Jonathan Flint1, John C DeFries, Norman D Henderson.   

Abstract

Recent advances in methodologies for testing epistatic interactions, combined with several successes in demonstrating genetic interaction effects in animal and human genetics, have rekindled interest in the role of epistatic influences on complex traits. It has even been suggested that the unacknowledged presence of epistasis vitiates the genetic dissection of human and animal behavior. Here we report a genome-wide interaction analysis of 1636 F2 mice to show that epistasis is of minimal importance in an animal model of anxiety. By using a sufficiently large sample of F2 animals, we provide evidence that interaction effects between any two loci contribute less than 5% to the total phenotypic variance in multiple tests of anxiety. We conclude that interactions between loci do not necessarily vitiate the genetic analysis of behavior in at least one animal model of anxiety.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15058379     DOI: 10.1007/s00335-003-3033-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mamm Genome        ISSN: 0938-8990            Impact factor:   2.957


  20 in total

1.  An epistatic genetic basis for fluctuating asymmetry of mandible size in mice.

Authors:  Larry J Leamy; Eric J Routman; James M Cheverud
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping using different testers and independent population samples in maize reveals low power of QTL detection and large bias in estimates of QTL effects.

Authors:  A E Melchinger; H F Utz; C C Schön
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Who's afraid of epistasis?

Authors:  W N Frankel; N J Schork
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  Concordance of murine quantitative trait loci for salt-induced hypertension with rat and human loci.

Authors:  F Sugiyama; G A Churchill; D C Higgins; C Johns; K P Makaritsis; H Gavras; B Paigen
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  2001-01-01       Impact factor: 5.736

5.  Response to 30 generations of selection for open-field activity in laboratory mice.

Authors:  J C DeFries; M C Gervais; E A Thomas
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 2.805

6.  Quantitative trait loci for maternal performance for offspring survival in mice.

Authors:  Andréa C Peripato; Reinaldo A De Brito; Ty T Vaughn; L Susan Pletscher; Sergio R Matioli; James M Cheverud
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Genome-wide epistatic interaction analysis reveals complex genetic determinants of circadian behavior in mice.

Authors:  K Shimomura; S S Low-Zeddies; D P King; T D Steeves; A Whiteley; J Kushla; P D Zemenides; A Lin; M H Vitaterna; G A Churchill; J S Takahashi
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  Genetic architecture of adiposity in the cross of LG/J and SM/J inbred mice.

Authors:  J M Cheverud; T T Vaughn; L S Pletscher; A C Peripato; E S Adams; C F Erikson; K J King-Ellison
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.957

9.  Gene interaction and single gene effects in colon tumour susceptibility in mice.

Authors:  T van Wezel; A P Stassen; C J Moen; A A Hart; M A van der Valk; P Demant
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  GENE EFFECTS ON A QUANTITATIVE TRAIT: TWO-LOCUS EPISTATIC EFFECTS MEASURED AT MICROSATELLITE MARKERS AND AT ESTIMATED QTL.

Authors:  Eric J Routman; James M Cheverud
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.694

View more
  11 in total

1.  Multivariate analysis of quantitative trait loci influencing variation in anxiety-related behavior in laboratory mice.

Authors:  Maria Grazia Turri; John C DeFries; Norman D Henderson; Jonathan Flint
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.957

2.  Statistical epistasis is a generic feature of gene regulatory networks.

Authors:  Arne B Gjuvsland; Ben J Hayes; Stig W Omholt; Orjan Carlborg
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-10-08       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  Finding the molecular basis of complex genetic variation in humans and mice.

Authors:  Richard Mott
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Genetic architecture of complex traits: large phenotypic effects and pervasive epistasis.

Authors:  Haifeng Shao; Lindsay C Burrage; David S Sinasac; Annie E Hill; Sheila R Ernest; William O'Brien; Hayden-William Courtland; Karl J Jepsen; Andrew Kirby; E J Kulbokas; Mark J Daly; Karl W Broman; Eric S Lander; Joseph H Nadeau
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-12-09       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Hormones and the Evolution of Complex Traits: Insights from Artificial Selection on Behavior.

Authors:  Theodore Garland; Meng Zhao; Wendy Saltzman
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 3.326

6.  Genetic architecture of quantitative traits in mice, flies, and humans.

Authors:  Jonathan Flint; Trudy F C Mackay
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 7.  Missing heritability and strategies for finding the underlying causes of complex disease.

Authors:  Evan E Eichler; Jonathan Flint; Greg Gibson; Augustine Kong; Suzanne M Leal; Jason H Moore; Joseph H Nadeau
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 8.  Child development and molecular genetics: 14 years later.

Authors:  Robert Plomin
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2012-03-30

9.  Dark matter: are mice the solution to missing heritability?

Authors:  Clarissa C Parker; Abraham A Palmer
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 10.  The future of genomics for developmentalists.

Authors:  Robert Plomin; Michael A Simpson
Journal:  Dev Psychopathol       Date:  2013-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.