Literature DB >> 11989692

An epistatic genetic basis for fluctuating asymmetry of mandible size in mice.

Larry J Leamy1, Eric J Routman, James M Cheverud.   

Abstract

The genetic basis of fluctuating asymmetry (FA), or nondirectional variation in the subtle differences between left and right sides of bilateral characters, continues to be of considerable theoretical interest. FA generally has been thought to arise from random noise during development and therefore to have a largely or entirely environmental origin. Whereas additive genetic variation for FA generally has been small and often insignificant, a number of investigators have hypothesized that interactions between loci, or epistasis, significantly influence FA. We tested this hypothesis by conducting a whole-genome scan to detect any epistasis in FA of centroid size in the mandibles of more than 400 mice from an F2 intercross population formed from crossing the Large (LG/J) and Small (SM/J) inbred strains. Genotypic deviations were imputed at each site 2 cM apart on all 19 autosomes, and these and centroid size asymmetry values were used in canonical correlation analyses for each of the 171 possible pairs of 19 autosomes to identify the most probable sites for epistasis. Epistasis for centroid size asymmetry was abundant, occurring far more often than was expected by chance alone (there were 30 separate instances of epistasis at the 0.001 significance level, when only two were expected by chance alone). The contributions of epistasis from 30 pairwise combinations of loci tended to suppress the additive and dominance genetic variance, but greatly increased the epistatic genetic variance for FA in centroid size given the intermediate allele frequencies of an F2 intercross population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11989692     DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb01373.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  24 in total

1.  The selective values of alleles in a molecular network model are context dependent.

Authors:  Jean Peccoud; Kent Vander Velden; Dean Podlich; Chris Winkler; Lane Arthur; Mark Cooper
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Little epistasis for anxiety-related measures in the DeFries strains of laboratory mice.

Authors:  Jonathan Flint; John C DeFries; Norman D Henderson
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.957

3.  Simultaneous mapping of epistatic QTL in DU6i x DBA/2 mice.

Authors:  Orjan Carlborg; Gudrun A Brockmann; Chris S Haley
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.957

4.  Genetic characterization of a new set of recombinant inbred lines (LGXSM) formed from the inter-cross of SM/J and LG/J inbred mouse strains.

Authors:  Tomas Hrbek; Reinaldo Alves de Brito; B Wang; L Susan Pletscher; James M Cheverud
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.957

5.  Genetic mapping of developmental instability: design, model and algorithm.

Authors:  Jiasheng Wu; Bo Zhang; Yuehua Cui; Wei Zhao; Li'an Xu; Minren Huang; Yanru Zeng; Jun Zhu; Rongling Wu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-04-15       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Craniofacial variability and morphological integration in mice susceptible to cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  Benedikt Hallgrímsson; Curtis J Dorval; Miriam Leah Zelditch; Rebecca Z German
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.610

7.  An epistatic genetic basis for physical activity traits in mice.

Authors:  Larry J Leamy; Daniel Pomp; J Timothy Lightfoot
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2008-06-05       Impact factor: 2.645

8.  A role for LAX2 in regulating xylem development and lateral-vein symmetry in the leaf.

Authors:  Guillermo S Moreno-Piovano; Javier E Moreno; Julieta V Cabello; Agustín L Arce; María E Otegui; Raquel L Chan
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 4.357

9.  Genetic variation for body weight change in mice in response to physical exercise.

Authors:  Larry J Leamy; Daniel Pomp; J Timothy Lightfoot
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2009-09-21       Impact factor: 2.797

10.  The impact of genetic parental distance on developmental stability and fitness in Drosophila buzzatii.

Authors:  Ditte Holm Andersen; Cino Pertoldi; Volker Loeschcke; Sandro Cavicchi; Valerio Scali
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2007-12-01       Impact factor: 1.082

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.