Literature DB >> 15057176

Medical staff attitudes toward family presence during pediatric procedures.

Joel A Fein1, Jaya Ganesh, Elizabeth R Alpern.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Investigate health care providers' perceived advantages and disadvantages of family member presence (FMP) for a wide spectrum of procedures in the pediatric emergency department.
SETTING: Urban tertiary care children's hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Pediatric emergency department faculty and nurses, pediatric residents.
METHODS: In a written survey, participants rated approval of FMP for 9 procedures: intravenous (IV) placement, urinary catheterization, suturing, lumbar puncture, fracture reduction, chest tube placement, endotracheal intubation, medical resuscitation, and trauma resuscitation. Respondents listed advantages and disadvantages of FMP for patients, families, and staff.
RESULTS: 71% (104/146) of the surveys were completed. Attending physicians and nurses provided similarly high approval rating for less invasive procedures, with a decrement in approval for more invasive or life-threatening situations. Attending physicians and nurses were more likely than residents to approve FMP for all procedures except IV placement, suturing, and urinary catheterization, which had similar approval rates for all respondents. Commonly expressed potential advantages were ability to calm the patient, decreased parental "helplessness," and increased parental knowledge that everything was done. Disadvantages included higher anxiety in room, disturbing parental memories, and detriment to success of the procedure. Medical-legal concerns, mistrust of providers, and more difficult teaching environment were uncommonly listed as disadvantages.
CONCLUSIONS: Emergency department staff support FMP for minor procedures, yet express concern regarding the effects of this practice on the family and the success of the procedure. Most attending physicians and nurses support FMP during highly invasive procedures and resuscitations, whereas residents do not. This information provides insight into the educational and systematic requirements of implementation of FMP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15057176     DOI: 10.1097/01.pec.0000121241.99242.3b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Emerg Care        ISSN: 0749-5161            Impact factor:   1.454


  6 in total

1.  Should parents accompany critically ill children during inter-hospital transport?

Authors:  J Davies; S M Tibby; I A Murdoch
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2005-05-12       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 2.  Justified use of painful stimuli in the coma examination: a neurologic and ethical rationale.

Authors:  Michael A Williams; Cynda H Rushton
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2009-03-07       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 3.  Family presence during resuscitation: A Canadian Critical Care Society position paper.

Authors:  Simon John Walsh Oczkowski; Ian Mazzetti; Cynthia Cupido; Alison E Fox-Robichaud
Journal:  Can Respir J       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 2.409

Review 4.  Family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation and invasive procedures in children.

Authors:  Cristiana Araújo G Ferreira; Flávia Simphronio Balbino; Maria Magda F G Balieiro; Myriam Aparecida Mandetta
Journal:  Rev Paul Pediatr       Date:  2014-03

5.  Factors Affecting Family Presence During Fracture Reduction in the Pediatric Emergency Department.

Authors:  Albert Zhang; Regina M Yocum; Michael D Repplinger; Aimee T Broman; Michael K Kim
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2018-10-18

6.  In situ simulation training for parental presence during critical situations in PICU: an observational study.

Authors:  Alice Bordessoule; Cristina Felice-Civitillo; Serge Grazioli; Francisca Barcos; Kevin Haddad; Peter C Rimensberger; Angelo Polito
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2022-03-12       Impact factor: 3.860

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.