Literature DB >> 15890692

Should parents accompany critically ill children during inter-hospital transport?

J Davies1, S M Tibby, I A Murdoch.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Parental accompaniment during inter-hospital transportation (retrieval) of critically ill children is not commonplace in the United Kingdom.
METHODS: A three month pilot of parental accompaniment was undertaken in 2002 (143 retrievals), after which time the policy was adopted as standard practice. A follow up audit was performed in 2004 (136 retrievals).
RESULTS: Findings were remarkably consistent between the two periods. Staff perceived little or no added stress during the majority of transfers (96% in 2002, 98% in 2004), and felt able to perform medical interventions without hindrance (98% in 2002, 100% in 2004). There was good agreement between medical and nursing staff regarding perception of stress and ability to perform interventions (phi statistic 0.57 to 1.00). Adverse events occurred during 11 (3.9%) retrievals; six of these involved a parent exclusively. Stress tended to be associated with adverse events or parental behaviour rather than disease acuity. Staff vetoed the offer of accompaniment on 11 occasions, for a variety of reasons. The majority of parents found the experience safe, beneficial, and perceived a reduction in stress as a result. These data may inform other retrieval services who are considering adopting a similar policy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15890692      PMCID: PMC1720213          DOI: 10.1136/adc.2005.074195

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child        ISSN: 0003-9888            Impact factor:   3.791


  15 in total

1.  Should parents accompany pediatric interfacility ground ambulance transports? The parent's perspective.

Authors:  G A Woodward; E W Fleegler
Journal:  Pediatr Emerg Care       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.454

2.  Should parents accompany pediatric interfacility ground ambulance transports? Results of a national survey of pediatric transport team managers.

Authors:  G A Woodward; E W Fleegler
Journal:  Pediatr Emerg Care       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.454

3.  "The worst journey of our lives": parents' experiences of a specialised paediatric retrieval service.

Authors:  Gillian Colville; Fiona Orr; David Gracey
Journal:  Intensive Crit Care Nurs       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.072

4.  Attitudes regarding parental presence during medical procedures.

Authors:  K A Merritt; J R Sargent; L M Osborn
Journal:  Am J Dis Child       Date:  1990-03

5.  Parents and procedures: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  H Bauchner; R Vinci; S Bak; C Pearson; M J Corwin
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Should paediatric intensive care be centralised.

Authors:  C G Stack; N R Bennett; J M Goddard
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-07-05       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Should parents be present during emergency department procedures on children, and who should make that decision? A survey of emergency physician and nurse attitudes.

Authors:  Andrew W Beckman; Brian K Sloan; Gregory P Moore; William H Cordell; Edward J Brizendine; Eric T Boie; Kevin J Knoop; Mitchell J Goldman; Marilyn R Geninatti
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.451

8.  Interobserver variation in interpreting chest radiographs for the diagnosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  M O Meade; R J Cook; G H Guyatt; R Groll; J R Kachura; M Bedard; D J Cook; A S Slutsky; T E Stewart
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 21.405

9.  Parental presence during procedures in an emergency room: results from 50 observations.

Authors:  H Bauchner; C Waring; R Vinci
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 7.124

10.  Parental presence and a sedative premedicant for children undergoing surgery: a hierarchical study.

Authors:  Z N Kain; L C Mayes; S M Wang; L A Caramico; D M Krivutza; M B Hofstadter
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 7.892

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  European consensus recommendations for neonatal and paediatric retrievals of positive or suspected COVID-19 patients.

Authors:  Ulrich Terheggen; Christian Heiring; Mattias Kjellberg; Fredrik Hegardt; Martin Kneyber; Maurizio Gente; Charles C Roehr; Gilles Jourdain; Pierre Tissieres; Padmanabhan Ramnarayan; Morten Breindahl; Johannes van den Berg
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 3.756

2.  Parental perspectives on the transfer process for critically ill children.

Authors:  Saoirse Cameron; Anna C Gunz
Journal:  CJEM       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 2.410

3.  Parent Participation in Morbidity and Mortality Review: Parent and Physician Perspectives.

Authors:  Sarah R de Loizaga; Katherine Clarke-Myers; Philip R Khoury; Samuel P Hanke
Journal:  J Patient Exp       Date:  2022-05-22

4.  Evaluation of specific quality metrics to assess the performance of a specialised newborn transport programme.

Authors:  Itziar Marsinyach Ros; Laura Sanchez García; Ana Sanchez Torres; Rocio Mosqueda Peña; Maria Del Carmen Pérez Grande; Maria José Rodríguez Castaño; Maria Dolores Elorza Fernández; Manuel Sánchez Luna
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 5.  The impact of parental accompaniment in paediatric trauma: a helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) perspective.

Authors:  Alan Cowley; Neal Durge
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 2.953

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.