Literature DB >> 15046432

The fate of augments to treat type-2 bone defects in revision knee arthroplasty.

J V Patel1, J L Masonis, J Guerin, R B Bourne, C H Rorabeck.   

Abstract

We report the five- to-ten year results of Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute type-2 bone defects treated with modular metal augments in revision knee surgery. A total of 102 revision knee arthroplasties in patients with type-2 defects treated with augments and stems were prospectively studied. Seven patients (seven knees) had incomplete follow-up and 15 patients (16 knees) died with the arthroplasty in situ. The mean follow-up of the 79 remaining knees was 7 +/- 2 years (5 to 11). The presence of non-progressive radiolucent lines around the augment in 14% of knees was not associated with poorer knee scores, the range of movement, survival of the component or the type of insert which was used (p > 0.05). The survival of the components was 92 +/- 0.03% at 11 years (95% CI, 10.3 to 11.2). We recommend the use of modular augmentation devices to treat type-2 defects in revision knee surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15046432     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.86b2.13564

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  16 in total

1.  Metaphyseal bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Danielle Y Ponzio; Matthew S Austin
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2015-12

2.  Results of sleeves in revision total knee arthroplasty: an editorial comment on recently published in the Journal of Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Chao Jiang; Wenwei Qian
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-11

3.  [Defect Reconstruction in Total Knee Arthroplasty with wedges and blocks]. [Corrected].

Authors:  R Hube; T Pfitzner; P von Roth; H O Mayr
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 1.154

Review 4.  Bone loss management in total knee revision surgery.

Authors:  Gabriele Panegrossi; Marco Ceretti; Matteo Papalia; Filippo Casella; Fabio Favetti; Francesco Falez
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Cementless revision TKA with bone grafting of osseous defects restores bone stock with a low revision rate at 4 to 10 years.

Authors:  S A Hanna; W J S Aston; N J de Roeck; A Gough-Palmer; D P Powles
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Tantalum Cones Provide Durable Mid-term Fixation in Revision TKA.

Authors:  Ivan De Martino; Vincenzo De Santis; Peter K Sculco; Rocco D'Apolito; Joseph B Assini; Giorgio Gasparini
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  Are Trabecular Metal Cones a Valid Option to Treat Metaphyseal Bone Defects in Complex Primary and Revision Knee Arthroplasty?

Authors:  Tommaso Bonanzinga; Thorsten Gehrke; Akos Zahar; Stefano Zaffagnini; Maurilio Marcacci; Carl Haasper
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2017-12-14

Review 8.  [Bone defect management in revision knee arthroplasty].

Authors:  Eric Röhner; Markus Heinecke; Georg Matziolis
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  Modular augmentation in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Alfredo Schiavone Panni; Michele Vasso; Simone Cerciello
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Tibial bone loss in revision TKA: Options for management without sleeves and cones -a schematic review.

Authors:  Sibin Surendran; P Gopinathan
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-01-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.