Literature DB >> 26351688

Freshwater discharges drive high levels of methylmercury in Arctic marine biota.

Amina T Schartup1, Prentiss H Balcom2, Anne L Soerensen3, Kathleen J Gosnell4, Ryan S D Calder5, Robert P Mason4, Elsie M Sunderland5.   

Abstract

Elevated levels of neurotoxic methylmercury in Arctic food-webs pose health risks for indigenous populations that consume large quantities of marine mammals and fish. Estuaries provide critical hunting and fishing territory for these populations, and, until recently, benthic sediment was thought to be the main methylmercury source for coastal fish. New hydroelectric developments are being proposed in many northern ecosystems, and the ecological impacts of this industry relative to accelerating climate changes are poorly characterized. Here we evaluate the competing impacts of climate-driven changes in northern ecosystems and reservoir flooding on methylmercury production and bioaccumulation through a case study of a stratified sub-Arctic estuarine fjord in Labrador, Canada. Methylmercury bioaccumulation in zooplankton is higher than in midlatitude ecosystems. Direct measurements and modeling show that currently the largest methylmercury source is production in oxic surface seawater. Water-column methylation is highest in stratified surface waters near the river mouth because of the stimulating effects of terrestrial organic matter on methylating microbes. We attribute enhanced biomagnification in plankton to a thin layer of marine snow widely observed in stratified systems that concentrates microbial methylation and multiple trophic levels of zooplankton in a vertically restricted zone. Large freshwater inputs and the extensive Arctic Ocean continental shelf mean these processes are likely widespread and will be enhanced by future increases in water-column stratification, exacerbating high biological methylmercury concentrations. Soil flooding experiments indicate that near-term changes expected from reservoir creation will increase methylmercury inputs to the estuary by 25-200%, overwhelming climate-driven changes over the next decade.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomagnification; estuary; hydroelectric reservoir; mercury; plankton

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26351688      PMCID: PMC4586882          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1505541112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  16 in total

1.  Antagonistic interactions among marine pelagic bacteria.

Authors:  R A Long; F Azam
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Biomagnification of mercury in aquatic food webs: a worldwide meta-analysis.

Authors:  Raphael A Lavoie; Timothy D Jardine; Matthew M Chumchal; Karen A Kidd; Linda M Campbell
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Sulfate-reducing bacteria: principal methylators of mercury in anoxic estuarine sediment.

Authors:  G C Compeau; R Bartha
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Methylmercury accumulation in plankton on the continental margin of the northwest Atlantic Ocean.

Authors:  Chad R Hammerschmidt; Michael B Finiguerra; Robert L Weller; William F Fitzgerald
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Differentiated availability of geochemical mercury pools controls methylmercury levels in estuarine sediment and biota.

Authors:  Sofi Jonsson; Ulf Skyllberg; Mats B Nilsson; Erik Lundberg; Agneta Andersson; Erik Björn
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Total and methylated mercury in the Beaufort Sea: the role of local and recent organic remineralization.

Authors:  Feiyue Wang; Robie W Macdonald; Debbie A Armstrong; Gary A Stern
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Response of a macrotidal estuary to changes in anthropogenic mercury loading between 1850 and 2000.

Authors:  Elsie M Sunderland; John Dalziel; Andrew Heyes; Brian A Branfireun; David P Krabbenhoft; Frank A P C Gobas
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Fate of mercury species in the coastal plume of the Adour River estuary (Bay of Biscay, SW France).

Authors:  Abubaker Sharif; Mathilde Monperrus; Emmanuel Tessier; Sylvain Bouchet; Hervé Pinaly; Pablo Rodriguez-Gonzalez; Philippe Maron; David Amouroux
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 7.963

9.  The rise and fall of mercury methylation in an experimental reservoir.

Authors:  Vincent L St Louis; John W M Rudd; Carol A Kelly; R A Drew Bodaly; Michael J Paterson; Kenneth G Beaty; Raymond H Hesslein; Andrew Heyes; Andrew R Majewski
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2004-03-01       Impact factor: 9.028

10.  Shallow methylmercury production in the marginal sea ice zone of the central Arctic Ocean.

Authors:  Lars-Eric Heimbürger; Jeroen E Sonke; Daniel Cossa; David Point; Christelle Lagane; Laure Laffont; Benjamin T Galfond; Marcel Nicolaus; Benjamin Rabe; Michiel Rutgers van der Loeff
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  21 in total

1.  Sediment organic carbon and temperature effects on methylmercury concentration: A mesocosm experiment.

Authors:  K L Buckman; E A Seelen; R P Mason; P Balcom; V F Taylor; J E Ward; C Y Chen
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  Biogeochemistry: Mercury methylation on ice.

Authors:  Elsie M Sunderland; Amina T Schartup
Journal:  Nat Microbiol       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 17.745

3.  Microbial mercury methylation in Antarctic sea ice.

Authors:  Caitlin M Gionfriddo; Michael T Tate; Ryan R Wick; Mark B Schultz; Adam Zemla; Michael P Thelen; Robyn Schofield; David P Krabbenhoft; Kathryn E Holt; John W Moreau
Journal:  Nat Microbiol       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 17.745

4.  Mercury flux from salt marsh sediments: Insights from a comparison between 224Ra/228Th disequilibrium and core incubation methods.

Authors:  Xiangming Shi; Robert P Mason; Matthew A Charette; Nashaat M Mazrui; Pinghe Cai
Journal:  Geochim Cosmochim Acta       Date:  2017-11-04       Impact factor: 5.010

5.  Role of Sediment Resuspension on Estuarine Suspended Particulate Mercury Dynamics.

Authors:  Emily A Seelen; Grace M Massey; Robert P Mason
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Impact of Water-Induced Soil Erosion on the Terrestrial Transport and Atmospheric Emission of Mercury in China.

Authors:  Maodian Liu; Qianru Zhang; Yao Luo; Robert P Mason; Shidong Ge; Yipeng He; Chenghao Yu; Rina Sa; Hanlin Cao; Xuejun Wang; Long Chen
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Bioaccumulation of methylmercury in a marine copepod.

Authors:  Cheng-Shiuan Lee; Nicholas S Fisher
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 3.742

8.  Organic carbon content drives methylmercury levels in the water column and in estuarine food webs across latitudes in the Northeast United States.

Authors:  V F Taylor; K L Buckman; E A Seelen; N M Mazrui; P H Balcom; R P Mason; C Y Chen
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2018-12-24       Impact factor: 8.071

9.  An examination of the factors influencing mercury and methylmercury particulate distributions, methylation and demethylation rates in laboratory-generated marine snow.

Authors:  Veronica L Ortiz; Robert P Mason; J Evan Ward
Journal:  Mar Chem       Date:  2015-12-20       Impact factor: 3.807

10.  Methylmercury bioaccumulation in an urban estuary: Delaware River USA.

Authors:  Kate Buckman; Vivien Taylor; Hannah Broadley; Daniel Hocking; Prentiss Balcom; Rob Mason; Keith Nislow; Celia Chen
Journal:  Estuaries Coast       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 2.976

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.