Literature DB >> 15044167

Lessons learned from a peer review of bedside teaching.

Thomas J Beckman1.   

Abstract

While evaluating bedside teaching by attending physicians on the Mayo Clinic's general internal medicine hospital services, the author learned that peer review enhances an understanding of teaching for both observers and subjects of peer review. In this article the author offers five insights derived from his and two colleagues' observations of bedside teaching during a six-month period in 2002. These are (1) the value of peer review to observers, (2) the apparently unlimited number of teaching strategies, (3) the prevalence of missed opportunities to provide feedback to learners, (4) the art of asking questions effectively, and (5) the possible relationship between a teacher's maturity and successful bedside teaching. Regarding the art of asking questions, he encountered four common problems (e.g., the underutilization of questions), but also found that accomplished teachers pursue a course of co-discovery by asking questions alongside their learners. Finally, he learned that experienced attending physicians often demonstrate teaching sessions focused on psychosocial aspects of care, the use of simple questions, and a willingness to expose their own inadequacies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15044167     DOI: 10.1097/00001888-200404000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  14 in total

1.  New instrument for evaluating teaching faculty, incorporating the changed expectations of today's teachers.

Authors:  Anne M Egbert; Anne D Walling
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Proposal for a collaborative approach to clinical teaching.

Authors:  Thomas J Beckman; Mark C Lee
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 7.616

3.  Group assessments of resident physicians improve reliability and decrease halo error.

Authors:  Matthew R Thomas; Thomas J Beckman; Karen F Mauck; Stephen S Cha; Kris G Thomas
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Impact of resident well-being and empathy on assessments of faculty physicians.

Authors:  Thomas J Beckman; Darcy A Reed; Tait D Shanafelt; Colin P West
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-10-31       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Success of a Faculty Development Program for Teachers at the Mayo Clinic.

Authors:  Staci M Lee; Mark C Lee; Darcy A Reed; Andrew J Halvorsen; Elie F Berbari; Furman S McDonald; Thomas J Beckman
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2014-12

6.  Improving participant feedback to continuing medical education presenters in internal medicine: a mixed-methods study.

Authors:  Christopher M Wittich; Karen F Mauck; Jayawant N Mandrekar; Karol A Gluth; Colin P West; Scott C Litin; Thomas J Beckman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Peer observation of teaching: A feasible and effective method of physician faculty development.

Authors:  Macy Stockdill; Bailey Hendricks; Michael D Barnett; Marie Bakitas; Caroline N Harada
Journal:  Gerontol Geriatr Educ       Date:  2022-02-23

8.  The impact of exposure to shift-based schedules on medical students.

Authors:  David A Williams; Jennifer R Kogan; Karen E Hauer; Traci Yamashita; Eva M Aagaard
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2015-06-19

9.  A novel approach to improve undergraduate surgical teaching.

Authors:  R C Baker; R A J Spence; M Boohan; A Dorman; M Stevenson; S J Kirk; K McGlade
Journal:  Ulster Med J       Date:  2015-01

10.  The effect of written standardized feedback on the structure and quality of surgical lectures: A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jasmina Sterz; Sebastian H Höfer; Bernd Bender; Maren Janko; Farzin Adili; Miriam Ruesseler
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 2.463

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.